Fisking Scott Lively’s Open Letter to Andrew Torba

Recently, Andrew Torba released a book outlining his idea of the philosophy of Christian Nationalism.  While I have not read his work yet, I read an article written by Scott Lively about it and I had a few problems with it.  So, in the spirit of Larry Correia, I’m going to fisk it.  Pastor Lively’s words will be in italics and my responses will be in bold.

Dear Brother Andrew. I am a Hebraic-oriented evangelical Christian attorney, pastor and historian who has devoted my entire adult life in Christ to Christian social, cultural and political activism. I bought your book "Christian Nationalism" to support the mission of Gab Social and want to offer you some constructive criticism.

So far, he’s off to a good start, but I’m wary of the “constructive criticism” phrase.  That term doesn’t usually mean anything constructive when it comes to Internet writings, but I’ll give Pastor Lively the benefit of the doubt since I don’t think he’s delving into 4Chan or Kiwi Farms.

At the outset, I want to commend you for your courage and vision in taking on the powers and principalities of the present age by working to break the chains of censorship and suppression of free speech, particularly of the biblically informed views that so powerfully contradict the secular humanist dogma of our Marxist would-be masters. They are the true enemies of "Judeo-Christian" civilization, and of course I choose that phrase intentionally to respectfully contradict your well-intentioned but misguided representation of its meaning and purpose relative to our national identity and heritage.

I see what the aforementioned “constructive criticism” was targeting.  He’s not really happy with Torba making a distinction between Christianity and modern Judaism.  The problem that Scott Lively seems to have is that he probably doesn’t understand where the ideas of secular humanist dogma and Marxism came from.  Here’s a hint: none of these ideas originated from European Christian scholars.

I will also add that I am both a member of Gab and a vehement defender of your right to address the distinctions between Judaism and Christianity. I do not consider you an anti-Semite and in fact believe that the secularized ethnic Jews working to destroy your work are actually far more anti-Semitic than they claim you are in that they deny and/or defy the Torah, whereas you worship and revere its Author.

It is said that the Talmud permits what the Torah forbids and this is certainly true in your statement about “secularized ethnic Jews”.  However, many of these “secular Jews” claim that abortion is a sacred rite for Judaism and have problem posting this stance on Twitter and calling anyone who opposes them “anti-Semitic”.

Also, I’m sure Andrew Torba is happy to know that you don’t consider him an anti-Semite.  Governor Greg Abbott of Texas would disagree with you.

What defines a "Semite" (Shemite) if not Yahweh-worship? It certainly can't be an ethnic connection to Shem (or Abraham or even Jacob), which virtually all humanity now shares because of genetic diffusion over millennia. No, it must be the practice of true Judaism, whose terms are defined by the Torah and Tanach (Old Testament Scripture), NOT the Talmud (commentaries on the Scripture by various Hebrew scholars with widely divergent views, values and validity).

Respectfully sir, I disagree with your statement.  Very few, if any, modern Jews practice solely what we call the “Old Testament” and, in fact, many use the Talmudic text far more often than what is found in the Torah.  And while I do regard that different sects probably have different versions of the Talmud, that doesn’t matter.  Talmudic texts are their primary source of their religion these days and these texts are incompatible with Christianity and Western philosophy in general.

Indeed, Judaism itself is as factional as Christianity but on a smaller scale, only because it's so much smaller in numbers. Jews are not just doctrinally divided, but notoriously so! As the famous old joke goes, "Ask two Jews, get three opinions." Thus, to cite the view of any Talmudic "sage" as representative of all Jews or Judaism itself (as you did on page 56) is as intellectually dishonest as an anti-Christian Jew or Secular Humanist cherry-picking from the collective works of Christian scholars to define all Christianity.

Not everyone has the time or patience to sit down and go through all the various doctrinal differences between the different sects of Judaism or Christianity for that matter.  However, both religions hold very basic core values.  For Christianity, you need look no further than the Apostle’s Creed as a statement of fundamental faith.  Modern Judaism rejects the Apostle’s Creed outright.  It is literally a religion that built around the rejection of Jesus as the Christ, or Messiah.

Which is an odd thing, if you think about it.  There are sects of Islam which have reverence for Jesus, not as God’s Son, but as a prophet in the same vein as their prophet Muhammad.  Most of other religions are built around the idea of revering a spiritual or divine entity.  But Judaism seems hell-bent on flatly rejecting Jesus, along with the Satanists and the secularists.

You begin Chapter 4, "This is Not a 'Judeo-Christian' Movement," asserting that "Christianity and Judaism are totally distinct, incompatible, and irreconcilable religions." In one essential sense that is true because, as you emphasize, Judaism denies that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. BUT, unlike all the other people groups of the world that also deny Christ (including all the secular factions in our diverse MAGA and populist/conservative movements whom you rightfully seem very comfortable collaborating with), true Torah-faithful Jews believe in a Messiah who will do all that things that Christians anticipate Jesus Christ will do on His second coming. They simply "missed the bus" on Jesus/Yeshua during His first advent (by God's own plan), but remain standing in line for the next one, which Romans 11 tells us they will catch, when (as God adds in Zechariah 12:10) "I will pour out on the house of David and on the people of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and prayer, and they will look on Me, the One they have pierced [and] mourn for Him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for Him as one grieves for a firstborn son."

Okay, you are way off base here.  There is a lot of rationalization for what should to obvious to you, a learned man of Christ.

First of all, they didn’t simply miss the bus.  We are told in Acts that the Jews outright persecuted the Christians and even chased them down in the Gentile towns and had them persecuted there as well.  In fact, there is very little persecution from the Gentiles in the book of Acts until Paul preaches in Ephesus, but that persecution had more to do with money than religion.

They didn’t miss the bus.  They literally tried to run it off the road.

As for your reference to Romans 11, you misinterpret it completely.  Paul does not say that the Jews will come back to the fold and recognize Jesus as the Messiah sent by God, but merely relates that such a thing would be a wondrous thing to behold.  Indeed, Paul writes in verse 12, “Now if their trespass means riches for the world, and if their failure means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean!”

As for the verse you cited in Zechariah, God could very well be only referring to the disciples of Jesus.  This does not necessarily mean all the Jews everywhere.

You and I presumably share all or most of what would be considered the most fundamental tenets of the Christian faith, and many non-essential doctrines too. But we differ strongly on "supersessionism" (replacement theology) which you defend as the justification for your personal theology. Importantly, what you have laid out in "Christian Nationalism" is your personal theology, which does not represent Christianity as a whole, but only one slate of views among the constellation of denominations. That's not a problem insofar as you admit it and don't attempt to impose your interpretations on non-essentials as dogma on the rest of Christendom.

I’m not going to completely presume what Andrew Torba’s personal theology is, but I’m going to state the Christian Nationalism isn’t a theology.  It is a political movement that emphasizes Christianity and nationalism, or rather, one that honors both God and country alongside fellow countrymen.  And yes, the Captive Christians in the United States are well aware of that Christian Nationalism isn’t the overarching dogma of Christianity in the United States.  Yet.

The flaw in your analysis of supersessionism (page 57) is the appeal to tradition (one of the classic fallacies of formal logic). Whenever we justify ourselves by church tradition instead of the Bible itself, we depart from sound Holy Spirit guidance to tenuous worldly humanism – the common error behind Roman Catholicism's self-authorizing "Magisterium" theory and Talmudic Judaism's self-authorizing "Revered Sages" club. Correcting that error in Christendom was the implicit premise of the Reformation, but unfortunately, the reformers failed to reform numerous extra-biblical human-created doctrines in Protestantism, including the RCC's dramatic changes to God's holiday calendar, the presumed right of the church to enforce dogma through murder (e.g. Calvin's execution of Michael Servetus), and a severe Greco-Roman cultural bias in interpreting Scripture that differs markedly from the Hebraic cultural perspective of the Apostles and the Prophets.

The Protestant Reformation started because the Catholic Church clung to power over Truth.  Martin Luthor’s theses were written to declare that the Catholic Church was in error with regard to the salvation of Jesus where they were essentially commanding people to buy their way into heaven.  This is a very basic overview of the situation though.

In truth, you have to look at the Great Schism and the Protestant Reformation in a similar vein to the Tower of Babel and the division of Israel under Rehoboam, Solomon’s son.  In all these cases, the institutions God established became large and prideful, which resulted in God dividing them in order to humble the proud and to ensure that His Truth was firmly established.

Many of those human-created doctrines were quickly jettisoned as Protestantism splintered into numerous factions, such as Presbyterianism, which made the world-changing quantum shift from the top-down ecclesiastical power-pyramid exemplified by the papacy (and Anglicanism) to bottom-up self governance authorized by the "priesthood of all believers" and organized like the Jerusalem Council of Acts 15. THAT is the deepest foundation-stone of America and of the modern movement for constitutionalism (foreshadowed by the Magna Carta in 1215, heavily influenced by Jews).

Okay, I suspected you were stretching your reasoning with that last bit about the Magna Carta, so I went and read the article you cited.  From what I can gather, the Jews in England were inflicting heavy debts on the English people, including requiring the children of the debtors to pay.  This all parallels what we are experiencing in this day and age with student loans, mortgages, credit cards, etc.  But that’s a whole other topic.

The “heavy influence” the Jews had on the Magna Carta was really because of their greed.  The clause cited basically prevented them from collecting debts from the children of debtors.

It is fascinating to see modern Jews take credit for the Magna Carta when their greatest influence was inflicting excessive lending on the populace.  Your last statement was incredibly dishonest at best.

The process of getting from Scottish Presbyterianism to the Pilgrim Separatism of the Plymouth Colony was also heavily influenced by Christian-Jewish cross-pollination. Indeed, I know from my studies of this, that there would never have been a U.S. Constitution or the populist overthrow of the Western monarchies if not for the 16th and 17th century Hebraic Movement in Holland and Great Britain. And that is why America is and has always been "Judeo-Christian." It has nothing to do with how many Jews were active in the physical founding of America, or how Christian-centric the first state constitutions were; it is simply an honest acknowledgment of the Jews' role in nudging Christians back to their first-century heritage that made America possible: a shared intellectual property right, if you will, like co-authors of a book or a scientific theory.

The US Constitution was the result of Enlightenment philosophers, none of whom were Jewish as far as I know.

And your use of the term “Judeo-Christian” tells me that you do not even know the origin of that phrase.  Look it up and know that modern Judeo-Christians are not allowed the right of return to Israel, unlike literally all other Jews, even those Jews convicted of pedophilia.

Lastly, you asserted on page 61, "It is impossible to overstate the importance of the historic cataclysm that was the Destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 A.D." Sorry, it not only IS possible, but you have done it. If that post-millennial doctrine were true, the real proof would have been unmistakable over the next thousand years, especially the end, but of course, it didn't look at all like the Millennial Kingdom of prophecy – because Christ's earthly kingdom, while very near, has not yet begun. You would know that if you studied the Bible from the literal Hebraic perspective, but you don't, and that's your right within the bounds of Christian liberty.

The Hedraic perspective of the New Testament isn’t one that I think many Christians would agree with.  And Revelations is merely prophecy, one that cannot be interpreted until the events described in that book have happened, much like the prophecies of Isaiah and Daniel.  Stop trying to fit the prophecies into a box.

Remember, Jesus was condemned to death by the High Priest because He said, “destroy this temple and I will rebuild it in three days”.  All the Jewish leaders present thought He was referring to the physical temple, not the His Body.  After all, Jesus did say that His kingdom was not of this world and the end of Revelation makes it clear that God will make the Earth His kingdom again.  How He does this is something we can only speculate on, which is a futile effort at best.

My point with the prior paragraph is to illustrate that factionalism will be the death-knell to any attempt to build unity on a theological foundation, which is why the founders and subsequent Christian generations chose the broadest possible platform – Bible-based Yahweh-honoring monotheism (exemplified in our national motto, "In God We Trust") – and not any flavor of Christian sectarianism (which led to many serious conflicts among the denominations in our early days as a nation and thus a ban on establishing state "religions" – meaning "denominations" – in the "Establishment Clause" of our constitution.)

And which unity do you desire Pastor Lively?  Because the Catholics demand that all Protestants come back to their church, while ignoring the Orthodox who regard themselves as the first and true church, Catholics be damned.  Meanwhile, the various Protestant denominations bicker over minor doctrinal differences that really don’t matter.

And yet, at the end of the day, all denominations praise Him.  We all worship and pray and do good works in His Name.

So at the end of the day, do we need unity?  From my perspective, Satan demands that humanity be united.  But God divides us constantly ever since the Tower of Babel incident.  Indeed, even Jesus Himself said that he did not come to unite us but to divide us against each other.  Not necessarily in war or conflict but simply to keep us from growing too big and too proud.

I don't expect you to change your theology based on one letter from me, but I do hope you will reconsider your gratuitous exclusionary rhetoric regarding our spiritual cousins in the House of Judah, treating at least the many who share our cultural values and all-important Creationist paradigm with the same basic respect and camaraderie you show to atheists in the MAGA and conservative movements. And I offer my assistance in making this necessary course correction if you care to accept it.

The House of Judah are not our spiritual cousins.  This much can be seen in how they treat us.  They have been behind all the subversive movements in the United States, starting with communism, gay rights, pornography, abortion, women’s rights, civil rights, and so many other damaging societal ills, it is getting hard to keep track of all of them.  Their fruits are death, perversion, and subversion.

You cannot judge a group by its ideology but by its fruits, after all.

Objectively, has this nation gotten better in the past 6 decades or so?  We cannot isolate the decay of the United States to a single cause, but a multitude of causes, many of which seem to have the same racial/religious identity rearing its head just inside the shadows.  From scientific materialism, to the elevation of psychology over spiritual healing to the destruction of the family, all of these things can be traced to some prominent Jewish thinker or pundit.  We know this because they like to brag about it.  It’s how Julius Rosenberg got caught, after all.

If you don’t believe me, then look no further than the current Biden administration.  You may want to note how many Jews are Cabinet members, which I think is a first for a Presidential administration.

Christian Nationalism is not a theology or a dogma, it is a movement to try and reclaim Western civilizations back into the hands of the Christian nationals whose ancestors founded and built these lands before the parasitic money-lenders, whom Jesus Himself whipped thousands of years ago, came to us.

Let me end this fisking with a question: we all regard the Jews as God’s Chosen people, but what exactly were they chosen for?  If you cannot answer that simple question honestly and make the proper logical inference from it, then you are a fool in the Biblical sense.

What America First Means to Me

 Recently, Mittens Romney stated that it was the America First policies that caused Russia to invade Ukraine.  Because the RINO shill can’t help but support the “president” whose election he helped to steal in order to secure his son’s position in Burisma.

And honestly, I don’t care too much what happens in Ukraine right now.  Our gasoline prices and food prices are about to hit record highs because the Biden administration hates Americans and wants children to starve.

But if America First policies had truly been implemented, Russia would have still invaded Ukraine.  But instead of all these stupid normie NPCs running around waving the wrong country flag, we would’ve had a lot more people just not giving a flying rat’s ass about the entire situation.

You see to me America First is all about the following things:

• A focus on ensuring that the vast majority of products and services used by American consumers are also produced by American-based companies that hire American citizens.
• Ensuring that all trade deals with foreign nations benefit the citizens of the United States and benefit the citizens of the foreign nation.  Otherwise, the deal is off because we will not exploit other nations for our own gluttony and greed.
• Pushing for traditional families and rejecting the sexual deviants who are perpetuating our society.  For some reason, nearly every idiot in the US thinks tolerance means that we should celebrate narcissistic perverts at every turn.  Sorry, but your child abuse manifested as disgusting sex acts is not normal, not to be celebrated, and you should repent of your wickedness.
• Encouraging married couples to have as many children as they can.  This means that we need to ensure that every father has a stable job situation, encourage a culture of wholesomeness, not sleaze, and promote the family at every turn.
• It’s about rejecting the outright anti-American culture that was cultivated by the Boomer generation.
• It means deporting a lot of immigrants, both legal and illegal, to ensure that Americans don’t have to accept lower wages because H1B Visa holders.
• It’s about maintaining our environment and maintaining our infrastructure, like roads, bridges, and schools.
• It’s about providing education with lessons that promote proper education, one that focuses on ability, merit, and Truth.
• It’s about bringing Christianity back into the public discourse, where politicians can mention God and Jesus and not be looked upon with contempt.
• It’s about bringing all our military abroad home to protect our own country and telling all of our allies that they are big boys and are responsible for their own defense.
• It’s about rejecting all refugees, save those who come from countries with a similar history and culture, like South Africa.

None of these things would have caused Russia to invade Ukraine.  If anything, the United States and our Western “allies” poked that bear one too many times.

In case you haven’t figured it out yet, the United States government is run by Satanic people.  The president, the military leaders, the Cabinet, Congressional heads, and everyone in-between them are all corrupt and currently damned to Hell.   But they’re going to destroy everything to spite the growing number of Americans who have figured this out and soundly reject them and their wicked designs.

There are more of us than there are of them.  They just hold the power right now.  But much of that power is dependent on the complacency of the American people, whose patience is about running thin as the prices of gasoline and food are about to skyrocket even more and the Housing market is about to crash big time.

Basically, we’re all fucked right now because our government isn’t America First and has no interest in governing with its own people’s best interests in mind.

To All The Left-Wing Crazies Responding to the Manchester Attack

There was a nail bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England, in case you haven’t been paying attention.  And you know what?  I don’t care.

This is what happens when you let the barbarians in.  They either attack you or they breed soldiers to attack you.  It happened in Rome and it has happened to many civilizations all over.  This is how civilizations fall.  They get displaced by less degenerate, though still r-selected populations who basically wreck your shit, rape your women, and murder your children.

It’s a story as old as history itself really.

So please, tell me how electing a Muslim mayor prevented this.  Tell me how hate crime laws stop this.  Explain to me how massive immigration prevents this.

Tell me how we should all just live together when Muslims have openly stated they will murder us for engaging in free speech about their death-cult of a religion.

Explain to me how not being racist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-Christian moves civilization forward in any meaningful sense?

The truth you can’t, you won’t, and you’ll just angrily rant about how I’m angry, mean, a racist, a bigot, etc.

I want a better nation for my children.

You just want to fuck in the butt.  Given those options, I choose pushing your degenerate parasitic ass out of a helicopter before you subject my four year old to a drag queen singing about “her” jazz hands in a public library.

Sure, that makes me a right-wing Nazi.  But you know what?  I don’t have to prove anything to my enemies.  They have to prove to me that they want to preserve our nation and our civilization.

And they’re doing a piss poor job of it.

The Coming Wrath

The United States government opposes Christianity.

It is perplexing, I know, in a country where 70-85% of its citizens claim to be Christian in some form or another, depending on what poll you look at.

But this scenario becomes more obvious when you consider that a man cannot serve two masters, as Jesus Himself once opined.  And the people who work for the State have been programmed to serve the State, even when the interests of the State run counter to God’s Will.

Right now, our government is seeking to overthrow Syrian leader Assad.  What comes next will be tragic for the hundreds of thousands Christians living at peace in that country.  They will see their women raped, their children murdered, and their men executed, much to the glee of the psychopaths that make up the rebels.

But the incidents of anti-Christian policies doesn’t stop there.  For too long, we have seen Christians marginalized, maligned, and held in contempt for standing for Jesus.  When men go to preach the Good News in gay “communities”, they are arrested.

When bakers refuse to bake gay wedding dildo cakes, they are called homophobic and their businesses are shut down.

The list goes on.  Christianity is treated as a grave sin in this country.

Don’t believe me?  If you are a Christian, try talking about it in casual conversation.  Don’t force it, but fall into it organically.  Then observe the reactions you get from people.  I’ll bet they’ll range from scoffs to people asking that you keep such things private.

I’m sure the reasons for this are many.  For the common man, Christianity is an allergy to them because they don’t want to admit they are sinners, evil, and in need of redemption.  Despite all the evidence to the contrary, they just can’t believe that they a bad person.

For the elite, it is a question of power.  In many cases, they seek to rewrite reality itself to support their vision of an ideal world.  That is why occultism is prominent among those in power.  It offers them a chance to rewrite reality itself.  You only have to sacrifice or rape children to get there.  And it takes many.

I wish I could separate myself from all of this, but I cannot.  There is a such thing as collective guilt and the United States has it in spades.  We voted for this for decades.  We became afraid to stand for Truth and in doing so became complacent in our own judgment against us.

I fear for my children.  I’ve made my peace with God and death, while still a thing I fear instinctually, is not a huge problem for me.  But my children may grow up in a society that seeks their death or imprisonment.  And all because they are white or Christian or straight or male.

And I want to fight against this, but my fellow Christians are so cucked, so complacent, that most days I wonder if it is better that I just accept the judgment coming and let God’s Wrath pour out on this contemptible nation.

How To Avoid Being Brock Turner

Brock Turner is the unfortunate victim of what amounts to a feminist judicial system.  For those of you who don’t know, he was a Freshman college student who got drunk with a Senior girl, walked out with her to a dumpster, and fingered her.  He stopped when he realized she was passed out but that didn’t stop a couple of white knights from tackling him and calling the police.

The girl in question, who continues to remain anonymous to protect her honor and not get charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, immediately agreed she was raped in her drunken state when she woke up.  She had a boyfriend you see and she didn’t want to her reputation tarnished by a silly one night stand.  After all, slut-shaming is countered by rape accusations.

A judge decided that while Brock didn’t commit rape, he did employ poor judgment in his inebriated state and for the crime of not having too many inhibitions and being with what I assume is an attractive woman, he was sentenced to six months in prison.  He got out on parole in three for good behavior, having little access to alcohol or women.

Unfortunately, Brock is now a legal sex offender, which means he can’t go near children ever again, nevermind that the “victim” in this case was older than him.  I’ve known people who narrowly avoided getting on the sex offender list for simply urinating on their own lawn, so at this point such a list is probably a joke were it not backed by the full force and violence of the Federal government.

Is this unfair?  Yes.  Is it tragic?  Yes.  Should Brock Turner be punished for his entire life?  No.

But the sad fact is, there is nothing that can be done.  The legal system is thoroughly feminized and caters to women more often than not.  It is a wonder that all men are locked up right now with a select few let out periodically to be used a bulls in order to perpetuate the human race.  The SCUM Manifesto seems to be gradually being enacted in our nation.

But what can be done?

There are few things that you can do, besides voting for the most racist, bigoted, insane leader you can find, which can reverse these trends.

For one thing, don’t college if you don’t need to.  Unless you are seeking a major in Technology or Engineering, you are wasting your time and money.  Instead, either go out and find a job or go to a trade school.  Either way, you should have no trouble finding something that will pay well eventually and at the same time reward hard work.

But if you do find yourself going to college, I suggest you do the following:

• Don’t go out partying.
• Don’t consume alcohol while on campus or anywhere near one, even if you’re not a college student.
• Don’t host a party.
• Don’t join a fraternity.
• Don’t interact with any woman while on campus or nearby a college campus.  If you find that you have to, simply keep your answers simple and make no physical contact.  Record all interactions as well with your phone.
• Don’t trust the police or any other authority figure to do what is right and just.  Instead, keep your damn mouth shut and always demand a lawyer be present when dealing with any kind of legal wrangle, even a parking ticket.
• Be a creepy loner.  Nobody will notice you and nobody will want to be around you.

Will this make you a pariah?  Yes, but you have to understand that you already are a pariah, especially if you are a white, straight man.  Simply focus on your studies, view sex, drugs, and everything else that goes on as nothing more than mindless distractions you can’t be bothered with.  Get your degree and get out.

In the real world, you will have plenty of opportunity to employ Game techniques and get access to sex and women.  Because in the real world, drunken party sex isn’t considered a crime and women are treated a little less like spoiled girls with no free will of their own.

If employed correctly, young men will starve women of the attention many of these crazy chicks desire and make college an uninteresting and boring place for academic again.

We can only hope.

The Idols of Christendom

Christendom has lost its way.  There was a time when people took it so seriously that they fought and died for Jesus.  Kings would acknowledge a higher power than themselves and the lower classes didn’t try to engage in narcissistic behaviors in order to garner unneeded attention.

These days, Americans and Europeans have their own gods which have replaced God.  They are groups or ideas which are considered “untouchable” by the mainstream culture and to bring any criticism to them brings nothing but miserly and public shaming to the offenders.

Women

Women are considered sacred in nearly all political ideologies.  Whether it is the feminists on the Left who demand equality to the Christians on the right who bash men for not paying their unfairly high alimony or child support.

You cannot criticize women. If they are incompentent workers, you are told that it has nothing to do with them but with the people around them.  If they are terrible mothers, it is the fault of the father.

Whenever you hear a man call his wife “his better half” or degrade himself in comparison to his wife, this is idolatry.  Christian men, of all people, should know better.

Unfortunately, whenever you say something that is counter to the narrative that women are goddesses, you are met with ire and disdain.  The sheer volume of pussy worship that occurs within Christian circles alone could be documented and written into a book.

If you really want women to be better people, you need to treat them like people.  Understand that they too have flaws, though their flaws are very different from the flaws of men, and understand how their brains are wired.

Jews

Pretty much everything you say against a Jew is considered anti-semitic, which is a special term Jews created to accuse people of racism.  Often times, they point to the Holocaust as justification for dismissing any criticism of Jewish culture.

Yes, Jews are in many of the upper echolons of power in the US.  We see them in Hollywood, various news outlets, in courts (3 Supreme Court Justices are Jewish), and in politics.  This is not because of some weird conspiracy to conquer the West but largely because they have a higher linguistic IQ than all other races.

Anytime you hear of someone shouting about the Jews in Hollywood producing porn or filth, we are told that they are mentally ill or closet Nazis.

I’ve seen conservative spout hatred toward libertarians because they are “anti-Israel” largely because don’t want to send tax dollars abroad.  I’ve seen people on the Left criticize the right for being pro-Jews-in-ovens.

The Nazis, despite not having the largest body count in the last century, are considered the most evil of organizations with Hitler literally regarded as the devil.  By writing that last sentence, people will probably assume I’m pro-Nazi.  I’m not but that is how ridiculous this mindset has become.

Blacks

Blacks are never portrayed as outright evil in any current entertainment culture.  They are always portrayed as confident, well-rounded individuals who have their shit together and provide a kind of stablizing aura to the white idiots.

If they are portrayed as gang-bangers, it is usually either the gang-banger with the heart of gold or driven to such a lifestyle because of poverty.  They are never portrayed as maniacs who rape women and then feed them to alligators.

Blacks have been used recently to replace all Ginger (or ultra-white) characters in most superhero shows and movies.  In the UK, it’s worse as black actors and actoresses are used in place of white ones for historical pieces.  Kind of like what Stalin did in the USSR.

Any criticism of black people, from highlighting their disproportionately high crime rates to their perpetual poverty to their propensity to violence and tribalism to their collectively low-IQ in comparison to whites is considered racist and hate-speech.

LGBT

The sexual deviants are considered the norm these days.  If you are a straight person, especially a straight man, you are “other” and therefore an oppressor.

If you look at the most common porn habits of the US, lesbian porn is the most viewed.  If you look at real lesbians, you’d find higher obesity rates and higher domestic violence rates.

Gay men have more sexual partners in a year than straight men have in their lifetime.  They have so much anal sex that their intestines start to fall out and their digestion is damaged.  And let’s not forget that AIDS is still primarily a gay man’s disease.  One that was easily avoidable.

If you view them as sinful or just plain disgusting, you will face serious social shaming and you may even face criminal charges.  Not allowing for gay marriages, whether its photography, dildo cakes, or locations is a violation of civil rights.

Apparently, civil rights now includes the right to cum into whatever thing you wish to do so.

It would be one thing if it was all in private.  But apparently narcissism is a common trait of many sexual deviants and so they can’t keep it in the bedroom.

Meanwhile, 63% of Americans have no problems with X-rated parades or sexualizing children.

Democracy

Democracy is the belief that everyone should vote on their government.  Unfortunately, this assumes that people are rational, selfless, and sane.  This could not be further from the truth, of course, so when the majority of people vote, they tend to vote for legalized pillaging of those they envy.

The US sends missionaries out to promote democracy worldwide.  Despite the fact that democracy isn’t the best solution in countries where the majority of people there have an IQ below 90.

It is considered to be the gold standard of government when for centuries of recorded history, most societies have faired better with a small elite few managing them.

I’m agnostic on government types.  Should I find myself under a king or dictator, it’s not that important to me.  But to say that democracy is the be all, end all while not seriously considering the alternatives is silly.   And any public condemnations of it is largely forbidden worldwide.

There are other idols in the West of course, but these are the main ones.  These are our gods that we have replaced with Jesus and God the Father.  It is no wonder that He has probably forsaken us and watches in sadness as our children are run over by Islamic barbarians in the streets.

Here's Another Group of Guys Who Deserve to be Tossed Out of Helicopters

First listen to some of the following video, courtesy of the TheBechtloff, which is a debate between Matt Forney and Beardson Beardly:

Okay, I lied, it wasn't a debate. There were no logic, reason, or rational thinking coming from Beardson. Instead, we had a total and complete loser who has to lie about everything yelling at Matt Forney for not being Beardson Beardly.

That is really what the debate boils down to. You have a man who is so jealous of another man's modest success in an increasingly popular political movement looking to knock him down a notch. In other words, Beardson Beardly suffers from a vice primarily afflicting women: Envy.

Any average, normal person would listen to that dialog and view Beardson as a reprehensible dirtbag who produces no entertainment value. He has to instead troll and verbally attack others who have done a better job than him and when he is called to account, he instead behaves like a child. Because he never matured beyond the teenage years.

Don't believe anything Beardson says about himself. Within the video itself, he contradicts himself and he doesn't care. Don't bother to tweet at him or debate him or others like him. There is no point because narcissists like him feed off attention.

The best way to deal with such men is to simply ignore them. Don't acknowledge, don't talk to them, and don't believe a damn thing they say. They are degenerates who celebrate the destruction of others with no regard to themselves.

If they were in ISIS controlled territories, they would be tossed off of rooftops, not for being homosexual, but for being themselves. There is a reason that disobedient children in ancient Israel were stoned to death. Beardson represents why.

Utility Does Not Derive Morality

Mainstream American culture by and large rejects God.  At best, God is an apathetic pro-sodomy deity with limited powers and is generally a wussy (see this past season of Supernatural for an example).  The very idea that God has His own rules which He expects all of us to follow, beyond the natural laws which cannot be violated, seems to generate feelings a rage or hatred from most people these days.

So what happens with the absence of God's Law? You create a power vacuum in our society where morality is based on vague notions of emotions and utility. Hence you see all these degenerate morlocks running around squawking "consent is needed" in order to justify every perverse act imaginable.

This kind of thinking crosses all boundaries of political spectrum because we are now no longer allowed to talk about God in public. Talking about God in public means talking about morality, pointing out that all people are sinners, and then hurting the feelings of people who like to wallow in their sin like a pig in its mud. And we can't have hurt feelings after all.

Truth is something that is very hard to come by these days. Instead of telling the Truth, that Jesus came and died for ours sins and we must strive to be perfect once accepting Him, we are marginalized as fanatics or zealots. Frankly, I'd rather be a zealot than a faggot.

So instead of deriving our morality from God, we instead look to utility. Did the two men consent to sucking each other's dick? Did the adult son consent to the sexual advances of his estranged mother? Can a six-year-old consent to sex?

And yet, there are people out there (for lack of a more eloquent term, let's call them "assholes") who view the world exactly like that. They seek to destroy children, either through education or molestation, and they have no qualms about ruining people's lives if they vocally disagree. If they had total power, they would round people up and slaughter them for the "sin" of disagreeing with them.

I've said in the past that economics is not morality nor can any moral code be derived from it. The same applies to utility. Because you can justify anything through utility (did it make you happy?).

It is high time we call all Christians, both devout and casual, to come back to God in a big way. Because we already are seeing the alternatives, which involve promoting gay pride parades, murdering unborn children, and allowing freaks to engage in carnal relations with non-humans.

A society built on God and His Son suddenly finds itself falling apart after rejecting Him. There should have been a book written on this somewhere....

The Nature of Degenerates

The latest mass murder in Orlando can best be described as a case where a barbarian (or barbarians) decided to impose barbaric law on a bunch of degenerates.  This is the typical outcome when barbarians invade any land in that they first go for easy targets where civilians are concerned.

I am not saying that all gays are degenerates, though many are.  In fact, the vast majority of LGBT people are a subset of degenerates.  They are, however, usually only around 3% of the population and hardly representative of the majority of degenerates in a society.

The degenerate class is made up of people whose ideals specifically call for the destruction of civilization as a whole.  In order to understand that, we have to understand what keeps a civilization going.

Firstly, civilizations require a solid culture as a foundation. Rome for the longest time made it difficult for foreigners to obtain citizenship, had a solid foundational moral code, and a solid idea of what makes a Roman.  Note that culture includes a common religion, a common race, and a common idea of what government should do.

Secondly, civilization needs children.  Children are key because they are the next generation.  And the children who are being born need to be children of the primary race who built the civilization in the first place, otherwise the societal IQ suffers for the worse.

Thirdly, people living in a civilization need to have low time preference.  This means that they plan ahead, stave off most pleasures of the moment in order to ensure that they are not destitute in old age or leave their children in financial ruin because of their bad decisions.

These are the common traits that most people need to have and agree upon in order to maintain a civilization.  There are probably more, but these three things are probably the primary traits of any successful civilization.

So what do degenerates do?

For one thing, they do not particularly like or encourage children, either outright or indirectly.  For example, telling women to pursue a career, go to college, and have children when they are nearly too old to do so is a mainstream ideal.  Tell a woman she should not go to college, have a career, and marry early so that she can have children while she is in her prime sexual health is considered sexist by many people, especially the entertainment culture we live in.

Obviously, sexually deviant practices and encouraging of said actions is also degenerate and anyone who does so should be considered a degenerate.

The welfare state promotes high time preference along with our materialist culture encouraged by corporate marketing.

Finally, the cultural Marxists and the Feminists (the primary subgroup of the former) are out to utterly destroy the idea of being an American.  The pro-immigrant factions of both parties are doing so as well by pushing for another, inferior culture or cultures.  And if these folks spent any time in any of these foreign nations outside of the resort bubbles they are used to staying in, they might see why American culture is far superior.

Degenerates are people who actively work against the interests of civilizations they reside in, even if they don’t consciously know it.  They usually exist in civilized societies in low numbers but when they gain a significant minority (like greater than 20% or so) or take power in key institutions (like entertainment, journalism, or government agencies), they tend cause civilization to decline.

The trouble is, the civilized usually fail to recognize the problem until the decline is in full swing.  Now, there may be leaders who are able to stave off the decline but once it begins, it tends to snowball.

But this is why the barbarians last much longer than the civilized: they have a zero-tolerance policy towards degenerates.

Overview of the Civilized, the Barbarian, and the Degenerate

Usually, people are broken down into three categories.  For the mainstream economists, they usually break people down to Rich, Poor, and Middle-class.  For the Objectivists, people are either Looters, Producers, or Moochers.

I propose a new class of people be created: Civilized, Degenerate, and Barbaric.

Civilized

The civilized are a group that is stereotyped as always liking classical music, dress very formally, and tend to be non-violent.

The truth is, the civilized are the main producers of a civilization.  They tend to think long-term, have low time-preference, and are very mature as a group.  They live, work, and often has strong ties to the community they live in.

A civilized man does not default to violence when resolving conflicts but isn’t necessarily above it.  He will try to use dialectic to convince others of his position on disputed issues.  He will resort to rhetoric if necessary but it always leaves a slight distaste in his mouth after employing such methods.

A civilized man has a strong moral worldview but, again, does not resort to violence to engage in enforcing it.  Other means are often employed like public shaming in order reign in the offenders.

This moral worldview is often shared by others in the community and it provides a kind of glue to keep people together.

Generally, the civilized work for the betterment of their communities and try and secure a better society for their children and their future children.

The drawback of the civilized man is that he doesn’t know when violence or rhetoric should be employed and when.  In the face of one of the other two group, neither of which adhere to the same standards or methods of the civilized, he will engage in his primary tactics to address.

Unfortunately, this can lead to disaster and ruin and so it is important for the civilized man to properly discern if the opponent he is dealing with is another civilized man or a barbarian or degenerate.  Once identified, the tactics need to be shifted properly in order to properly engage his opponent.

Another drawback that is common amongst civilized men is that they like to apply their moral worldview’s tactics to the non-civilized.  An example of this is the near universal reaction in the West to Uganda’s passage of the death penalty for homosexuals who rape children and disabled people as one of derision, despite that fact that Uganda is not a nation of civilized men.

Barbarian

The stereotypical barbarian is portrayed as strong, moderately intelligent, and often as a kind of romantic figure.  Tarzan or Conan are typical examples of this.  Truthfully, barbarians are merely man at his most primitive social state.

Sure, a barbarian can have modern technologies which were created by the civilized.  They tend to use guns in modern times rather than spears and swords.  They know how cell phones work and use them as much as the civilized do.

But socially, they are primarily tribal and have a distinct loyalty only to their tribe.  Within their tribes, they have a moral code which holds them together and that moral code is often enforced by brutal means.

Honor killings and stoning of rape victims are some of the more extreme examples of this enforcement.  In truth, they tend to not take the time to empathize with criminals and law-breakers and are quick to issue out punishment.

Those who exist outside the tribe, however, are viewed as fair game.  We see this kind of behavior in Europe as the various refugees have little to no regard for sexual abstinence when it comes to European women.

On top of that, barbarians have no qualms about brutally enforcing their own laws people who visit their lands.  If you’ve ever been to a Muslim nation during Ramadan, don’t chew gum in public during the day is all I say to this effect.

Barbarians tend to focus on long-term planning as well, but this usually is restricted to their own tribe.  Usually, they do not focus on making things better for their children, but securing what they have and ensuring their children can at least have that.

Barbarians have often lived amongst the civilized in some form or another.  While they do live in their own lands, when in civilized parts of the world, they tend to cluster into sections of societies where they are least likely to have outside interference.  It could be ghettos, it could be trailer parks, it could be any number of places segregated from the civilized.

Barbarians tend to flaunt the laws of the civilized countries they live in though.  This takes on many forms, from as small a thing as drug use to living as their barbarian counterparts do in the uncivilized sections of the world where murder of the “other” is common.

They also are prone to living in the poorest standards of living amongst the civilized.  They possess a high time-preference and little maturity, preferring to engage in pleasurable acts now rather than later.  This does not mean they are prone to them, as they still can retain their moral code and live alongside the civilized with little conflict.

The trouble with this is that eventually, the civilized grow weary of them and take decisive action, usually in the form of calculated brutality.  In Rome, for example, this took the form of crucifixions, where those deemed less-civilized were treated much more harshly than barbarians ever could treat them.  And while it is repulsive, such actions keep barbarians in check when they live within a civilized country.

Barbarians are also prone to conquest and expansion and don’t maximize their existing resources.  Nomadic warrior tribes will often times conquer neighboring lands in an effort to gain more wealth, power, and prestige.  They aren’t very intelligent from an IQ-standpoint, but they are very cunning in many ways which can surprise civilized men, which sometimes merits an extreme response from the civilized.

The civilized, you see, can engage in brutality just like the barbarian, but it can be measurably much more devastating and horrifying when employed.  This is the barbarian’s downfall, in that they usually view the civilized as soft and weak, when in fact they are merely holding back.

Degenerate

The degenerate is merely the group within either a barbarian tribe or a civilized society who actively engages in behavior that will lead to its ruin.  They are usually found within the civilized societies more often than within barbarian tribes because barbarian tribes have a more tight-knit relationship and very low tolerance for degenerate behavior.

In a civilized world, there are always degenerates.  They tend to be the groups of people who engage in outright selfish acts, think nothing of anyone else, and destroy their livelihoods in the process.

Usually, we see the civilized become degenerates when they get too comfortable with their lives and begin to engage in their suppressed hedonistic urges.  Once engaged in hedonism, they begin a campaign to validate their selfish and destructive desires with the civilized, who are usually overwhelmed by them at first because they fail to recognize the degenerates for what they truly are.

Barbarians too can become degenerates and that is usually when they migrate to civilized societies and engage in their own forms of hedonism rather than adhering to their tribal moral codes.  They are disconnected with their roots and thus become degenerates because it is far easier than to become civilized.

There is probably nothing pleasant that can be said about a degenerate.  They lack any sort of wisdom or foresight, despite some being above average in intelligence, and they attribute all their problems in life to external causes.  They seek to destroy everything around them that makes them feel bad and will often infiltrate various organizations and institutions to achieve this end.

The trouble is, once a civilization becomes wealthy and prosperous, the degenerates increase in proportion as well.  And once they reach critical mass, the civilization that they benefitted from and allowed them to engage in their selfish actions ultimately collapses.  Their societies revert to barbarism and the degenerate is killed off.

That is the real drawback of the degenerate.  They are the force that destroys civilizations, even if they don’t recognize it, which many usually don’t.

The one positive thing I can say about the degenerate is that he is very good at being deceptive, especially the more intelligent ones.  Often times, he will engage in pseudo-dialectic debates with the civilized which leaves most onlookers confused and sometimes sympathizing with him.  He will talk in a manner which disguises his true self, one of absolute abomination, with one of pity.  Think of a serial killer talking about his “urges” or a child rapist talking about his “attractions”.  In both cases, does it really matter what their attractions and urges are?

Conclusion

I think this sums up the various groups of humanity very well.  Sure, there is no equality between the various groups, but I think it perfectly breaks them down.  Of course, the degenerate is the worst of the bunch, with the barbarian and the civilized having a mix of positives and negatives.

I think it is important to recognize what kind of people you are dealing with when addressing certain groups.  If you are engaging college protestors, you are probably dealing with degenerates.  If you are dealing with immigrates, you are probably dealing with barbarians.  If you are dealing with fellow church-goers, you are dealing the civilized.

That’s an example of the different ways in which you can recognize what people group a person belongs to.

It is also important to recognize the realities of each group.  Barbarians will have little regard for people outside of their own tribe, the civilized will have trouble dealing with the other two group appropriately, and the degenerates are abominations seeking to destroy everything around them.

On Virtue Signaling

Virtue signaling.  It is a term that is not heard outside of certain circles of the Internet and it is amazing that most people haven’t caught on to the game these days.

In short, virtue signaling is an action done for the sake of the supposed virtue behind the action.  It is a narcissistic action that is about raising yourself up and not so much doing the right thing.

But motivations are often secondary.  If you are doing good to help others or help yourself, you are still doing good.  Western culture gets hung up on motivation too much, especially in America, because for some reason, we like to judge the hearts of others.

So if I see someone feeding the homeless in front of the press, I don’t care that he’s an attention whore because at least the homeless are getting fed.  And usually wicked people who behave like righteous people end up failing within their lifetimes.

The problem with virtue signaling these days is that it mostly happens with ideas that are neither virtues nor vices.

The most common form of virtue signaling these days is for white people to try and prove to the world that they are not racist.  There are a variety of ways in which they do this, though, with the most common method being the adoption of a child of a different race.

I’m sure the child you adopted appreciates that you have him around to prove a point to a bunch of communists.

Racism is not a vice nor a virtue.  In fact, I doubt that it even exists since primitive tribalism never involved groupings based solely on skin color.  But that was another blog post.

On the other hand, Anti-racism is also neither a vice nor virtue, but it appears to be destroying more lives and creating more divisions than racism theoretically ever did.

While virtue signaling does take place on the Right, usually in the form of token children, it is much more prominent on the Left.  Communists tend to use rhetoric, largely because they are too stupid or too illiterate to use dialectic, and virtue signaling is nothing more than emotional appeals of one’s own self-righteousness.

So we have communists engaging in man-shaming, white-shaming, Christian-hating, and all other sorts of “virtues” where they try to appear either penitent or righteous or both.  From a mediocre author stating he’s a rapist to a feminist claiming there’s oppression in video games to a white woman passing herself off as a black woman and leading a local NAACP chapter, virtue signaling is the primary means of engaging in rhetoric for the cultural Marxist.

The sad thing, most Americans, especially white Americans, have grown up with this guilt stigma that has been hammered into their collective psyche in government skools.  This causes them to overcompensate for the supposed collective crimes or overlook the virtue signaling of others.  Because there is nothing worse than being called a “racist” in modern times.

The solution to combating virtue signaling is to stigmatize it.  Respond to it with contempt anywhere you see it and people will back off from it.  Once they realize that their attempts at doing the wrong thing for the wrong reasons won’t be accepted as good or righteous, they will find other pursuits, hopefully more constructive ones.

An Important Talk

Son, it is time I talked to you about women.  Not the sex talk that every father should talk to you about because I am certain that you’ve already learned much of that from friends and the Internet.

No, it is time I talked to you about how women operate and how they think.  This is not an easy thing to talk with you about because I will be relating some harsh truths for you.  Plus, everything I tell you will be contradicted by most other men and women alike.

Women, for the most part, are very pragmatic when it comes to romance.  What this means is that they are not the sex who seeks out to be romantic.  You’ll notice that when women claim they want romance, they often are unwilling to engage in it themselves and instead want you to expend resources in order to “romance” them.

This is not a bad thing, just a reality.  For them, romance is a show not of affection or love, but of the status of your ability to provide for them and how much you are willing to spend on them.

Since the beginning of mankind, men have always been the provider.  Women have been the child-bearer and manager of the provided resources.  Now, this dynamic is not exact and the roles vary depending on the individual couple you look at, but in general this has been the case.

That is why, for instance, you have societies where men have more than one wife.  In those cases, it is a status symbol for a man who has a lot of wealth and resources.

So when you go on dates, always be mindful that she is evaluating your ability to provide her with stuff.

The other thing you have to keep in mind is that you must also be attractive to women.  This means you must present yourself well.  You must be confident, even if you feel that pit in your stomach, and you must always keep your focus on her eyes when talking to her.  If you show weakness or awkwardness, you might amuse her but you will not be able to attract her in any meaningful way.

There is a lot you can do in this regard but the point is you might have to fake your confidence if you wish to attract another woman.

As you get older, you may find yourself wanting to find a wife rather than just another “girlfriend”.  You are fortunate in that you live in a time where you get to chose who you wish to marry rather than simply accept someone you mother and I select for you.  Not that we would make a bad decision.

Dating for the purposes of finding a wife is more like a screening process.  There are a lot of things that you can leave to personal taste but I would like to make a few recommendations so that you don’t find yourself with a woman you can’t stand to be with.

Understand that marriage requires sacrifices for both the husband and the wife.  For the husband, he is giving up his freedom and his resources while at the same time assuming a leadership role nobody really trains him for.  For the wife, she is giving up her freedom, hopefully her virginity, and her beauty to a man.

Knowing this dynamic is how you can better screen out women.

First of all, if she has had a lot of sex in the past before meeting you, she isn’t worth the trouble of marrying.  Yes, she’s experienced.  She’s also probably damaged and very likely to divorce you down the road.  Now, most women average out to about 3 partners before marriage, and while there is some risk of divorce there, it is less than if she has more than 5.

Secondly, dump her as soon as you find out if she has had an abortion.  Women who have had abortions aren’t interested in sacrificing for the good of a family.

Thirdly, don’t worry about trying to be a good Christian to women, even Christian women.  Women tend to have a subjective moral code.  Good Christian women have been known to compromise their beliefs in order to fulfill their emotional desires, oftentimes with devastating results.  That is one of the burdens of being a husband and a father: that you must maintain a solid moral code for you and your family.

However, any woman who has no qualms about compromising her moral code, even against your wishes, will not suddenly submit to your headship after taking a vow.

Fourth, you shouldn’t worry so much about what she does for a living, but you should concern yourself with her spending habits.  Women do spend much more than men, which is why marketing often targets women, but at the same time if she is irresponsible with her money, she will be irresponsible with your money once you are married.

Lastly, never stick around with a woman who cheats on you.  Ditch her and never look back.  If you can, don’t even associate with her friends.

I am no expert son, but at the same time, this is what experience and the experiences of others have taught me.  Any fool can learn from his own mistakes.  But a truly wise person learns from the mistakes of others.  So understand the mistakes of others and do not make them yourself.

I want to finish this up by saying that I am not trying to discourage you in finding yourself a wife.  It is always a risk and there is always the divorce of Damocles hanging over your head.  But the rewards are much better and much more fulfilling.  The only downside of divorce is that you may miss out on your kids and you may end up paying your ex-wife for the rest of your life.  But understand that as a man, things will get better for you as you grow older.  For women, they do not.

So take the risk within reason.  Do not go for the crazy slut or the tattooed floosy.  And always be ready to leave her should her behavior unworthy of your affections.

And lastly, do not fear women nor fear being alone in life.  There are worse things.

This Wonderful Faggot Culture We Live In

This is the faggot culture we live in right now:

Emojis are quickly becoming the language of the Internet, but with that power comes a raft of new legal issues. Cases are beginning to emerge in which police charge people — often kids — for using emoji in ways that they deem threatening.

According to a Washington Post feature on the subject, a 12-year-old girl in Fairfax, Va. was charged with threatening her school and computer harassment because she posted a message on Instagram that included a bomb, knife and gun emojis and the phrase “meet me in the Library.”

I wish I could blame the cops for being functionally retarded.  But it isn’t their fault entirely.  The Second Set of Books demands that all hurt feelings in women be mitigated and that all negative emotions created due to external sources be treated as crimes.

In other words, we live in the age of the faggot culture.  We live in an age where perceptions of reality are filtered not through the five senses but through our emotional states.  We let emotions guide our morals and we feel justified when we attack those who have harmed us.

The government school system is a proving ground if you will.  There you find that if you are not a white, heterosexual boy, you get all the coddling and excuses you need.  It is the SJW-utopia where political correctness is mandatory, mentioning God or Jesus is forbidden, and praying to Allah is virtue.

In this case, the girl in question merely used emojis, which are just little icons, to express how she felt.  But because these triggered negative emotions in other people, she was guilty of the crime of causing wanton badfeel in others.

Now that the millennial generation are becoming adults, we are going to see more and more of this extreme nonsense.  Because people in the education system are not educated but morlocks who desire to feel safe from harmful feelings and negative events.

If we let them win, the end result will be beheadings of children and safespace rapes.  Don’t let these insane Marxists win.

The Outsourced Church

The Western Churches these days have by and large outsourced their main callings to other institutions, mainly governments at various levels.

What do I mean by this?  Put simply, churches no longer teach morality and the importance of obeying God but instead focus on salvation and God’s grace.  If the subject of sin is brought up in a sermon, it is usually treated as a way to celebrate the forgiveness of God through the sacrifice and resurrection of His Son Jesus.

This is a wildly narcissistic view of Christianity as it absolves most people of their sins, mainly women, while at the same time alienating potential congregates who are looking for a fatherly church community, not a motherly one.

And yes, this does split along sex differences.  Generally, women don’t like to be told that they are sinners.  Even in more traditional churches which teach the importance of submission, women tend to group themselves into the holier-than-thou cliques.  If a woman is caught behaving in a degenerate way, she is ostracized from the group.

Men, on the other hand, crave certainty in the world.  We tend to be the ones concerned with stable moral codes and ethics which do not fluctuate based on their emotional whims.  This is probably why it is easier for men to hear that they are sinners because we tend to be more concrete in our beliefs and moral ideologies than women.

Of course, this is not to say that men are superior to women when it comes to being righteous but I will say that it is very rare for God to raise up a woman as a prophetess in the Old Testament and that there were no Apostles of the female persuasion.

Why am I highlighting sex differences when I started talking about churches no longer teaching morality?  Quite simply, it has to do with the fact that women are the primary focus of the church these days.

Sure a pastor can go to the pulpit on Father’s Day and bash men for not fulfilling their primary role as husband and father to the families they supposedly have abandoned.  But that same pastor cannot stand on the pulpit and tell women not to divorce their husbands, despite the fact that divorces are primarily initiated by women and not men.

He cannot say that women should stay with their husbands no matter what, that their oath to God, which was made on their wedding day, had no loopholes nor escape clauses.  That the husband was not responsible for her emotional state and that she should, as the Bible dictates, submit to his authority.

Because to say such things in a sermon means the end of his flock.  I would not be surprised if people literally got up and walked out seconds after hearing such things.

But feminism and the pandering to womenfolk is not the only reason for the failure of churches to be the moral beacons of society these days.  There is the fact that 501c3 organizations cannot engage in political discourse.

For example, a church cannot take a moral stand against abortion unless they wish to be audited by the IRS.  And yes, that has happened in the past and will probably happen again.

On top of that, there are many laws on the books which criminalize sin.  Now, I have no problem with laws dictating how to handle criminals, such as murderers, thieves, etc., but at the same time, we are using the law to punish adulterers, drug-users, prostitutes, and gamblers.

We are taking the hammer of government to attack spiritual sickness rather than bringing such people before God and letting His grace touch them.

In essence, the churches in the West have outsourced their responsibilities as moral teachers and preachers to the government, which determines its moral code based on the whims of the electorate and enforces it with a gun pointed to your head.

In order for the church leaders to become a force for good again in this country, they need to take strong and controversial stands against the obvious moral decay of our society.  And not just the easy targets like sexual deviants or murderers but divorce, abortion, single motherhood, and a host of other societal ills which are currently praised rather than condemned.

Maybe then more and more people will take them seriously.

IQ and Civilization II

I have previously established that IQ and civilization are inexorably linked.  That in order to maintain a civilization, a society has to have an average IQ at or above 100 points.  While we cannot measure the IQ of ancient civilizations, modern ones bear this out.

So what needs to be done in the United States?  Already we are seeing a slight decline in the collective IQ of the US and it may go down further.  So here are some suggestions I have to remedy the situation and theoretically save US civilization:

• End all welfare programs.  I’ve harped on this a lot in the past but welfare programs discourage people from working.  Effectively, stupid people can breed more while forcing productive and intelligent people to not breed and focus on working.
• End Free Trade.  This will bring jobs back into the US and will allow people no longer on welfare to actually find decent work.
• Require a minimum IQ for all government work, preferably at 95 or above.  This is because you don’t want people with criminally low IQs running the government or overseeing a group of people with guns.  When I say “criminally low” I mean an IQ range in the 80 points where criminality is strongly correlated. There is precedent for this as governments have discriminated against high-IQ people applying for government jobs.
• Ensure that public school teachers have a minimum IQ of 100.  You cannot have teachers who are less intelligent than the average student after all.
• Set a minimum IQ rating for student loan qualifications.  If a person is too stupid to attend college, than providing him or her with a loan is exploitation.  There is a special circle in Hell for people who exploit stupid and/or poor people.
• Deregulate and bring about a freer market.  With a more free market system in place, you’ll see more rewards go to high-IQ people.
• Stop Encouraging women to go to college.  They are wasting their prime child-bearing years getting useless degrees, more so than men, and entering a workforce which generally rewards merit over test-taking skills.
• End Third-World Immigration.  In doing so, we will keep low-IQ people from over-saturating the country and thus causing more conflicts between natives and foreigners as well as increasing welfare.

There is more, but the main focus is about encouraging more intelligent people to engage in roles which benefit society and ensure the future survival of our civilization.  Unfortunately, many of these suggestions are also very radical and this blog is very small.

Also, IQ is not a virtue, merely a survival trait of the United States.  If we were all living in the desert as aborigines, then I wouldn’t consider IQ to be that important.

But it is critical in the United States.  Look at Detroit where the average IQ among the desolate areas tends to be criminally low.  That same thing can happen elsewhere should be continue on this path.

The Silence of Christianity

There is an intellectual war going on in the West right now.  It is one that runs deep into the souls of many average people who really just want to work, eat, and play.

But the elites and other assorted snobs of the world cannot abide with people just doing their thing.  Everything has to be micromanaged (regulated) by the State and any competition with the State must be eliminated.

No where is this more apparent than the banishment of Christianity from the mainstream.  You literally cannot talk about God or Jesus positively in any mainstream media event or newscast and those who do are usually treated as crazy or quickly cut from public life.

In the United States, where Christians account for the 70-85% of the population, depending on what poll you look at, this is patently absurd.  If well over two-thirds of the people know about it, have a basic understanding of it, and probably wouldn’t be offended by its mention, then why wouldn’t you talk about it?

This alone should stand as evidence of the dominant culture in our society today.  We have Jesus but we refuse to talk about Him.

Meanwhile, various churches in the US assume that everyone else is corrupt and preach about evangelism.  We don’t need evangelism in the United States, we need people to stop being cowards about their faith.

Granted, there is nothing more annoying than someone who obsesses over a topic.  This is probably where the negative appeal of various Social Justice Warriors comes from as they constantly talk about who white straight men are evil and how women, minorities, and anyone in the LGBT movement are oppressed by them.

After a while, nobody really cares what you are talking about.

Christians are the majority in the United States right now.  Yes, various other groups are on the rise.  Those are trends and still haven’t reached the level that Christianity has.

If a church wants to reach out to the lost, be the quiet place to think about the man in the sky.  Don’t assume that people you meet haven’t heard about God, Jesus, Satan, the Holy Spirit, Heaven, Hell, and everything else.  We’ve all heard it and we all know about it.

As for the Christians out there, don’t be afraid to talk about your faith when the topic is brought up.  Don’t worry about the consequences.  So what if you become a pariah, at least you’ll be one for the right reason.

There is no shame in your faith.  Embrace it and declare it where appropriate.

And when you are questioned about matters of morality, don’t be afraid to point to God as the one who imprinted on all of us His moral code.  No, it isn’t a high-church intellectual position to take.  But chances are the person asking you the question is probably dumb as Hell anyway.

If churches are really serious about standing against the corruption and decadence of the West, they will stand up and fight the erasing of Christianity from the public square and the criminalization of practicing it.

Otherwise, the Muslim hordes will eventually overrun us.  There is no such thing as a post-Christian world because the absence of societal belief or faith is a fractured and broken culture.

IQ and Civilization

Why has there been a civilization in Eastern Asia for centuries now but not a single cropping up in sub-Saharan Africa?

It is a good question and one that needs to be addressed.  Unfortunately, the West doesn’t want to confront this simple dichotomy because it would bring up subjects which run counter to hapless idealism.

Basically, it would be racist to think about such things in the minds of most white people.

What I believe is that it mainly comes down to IQ and location.  In sub-Saharan Africa, you basically have a place with no seasons.  As such, you have no incentive to plan ahead too much.  So tribalism rules the day and low-IQ people are allowed to breed with impunity and without suffering the consequences of their more destructive behavior.

As a race, the Chinese (yes, I know there are different types of Chinese but I don’t care to know them any more than they care to understand the different between a redneck and a hipster) have a much higher IQ than just about everyone else in the world.  This doesn’t make them superior as many of their focus tends to be more technical.

The point is, though, is that people with higher IQs tend to plan ahead.  In other words, they have low time preference, a critical feature of any civilization.

History plays this out.  People who have higher IQs tend to build civilization while people who do not end up engaging in tribalism near constantly.

Is IQ the only factor?  Probably not.  Like I mentioned before, there is the environment you live in.  If your only seasons are sun and rain, then you’re not going to concern yourself with what you need to do to stay alive for the next few years.  Because food, while difficult to obtain, can still be gathered in an area that grows plants constantly.

I’m sure there are other things that I am missing but the main thing is having a majority of people who are intelligent enough to stave off pleasures and focus on what they need to do in order to secure the future.

And this is what drives men to build cities, to engineer new technologies to provide more for people, and to allow people to become what they want without the distraction of the predator clawing at their tents.

Possibly a Good Year

It’s going to be a fun year for the West, especially in the United States.  Let me list the ways:

• We have a showdown between the SJWs and everyone normal in the Science Fiction and Fantasy literature world.  Yes, the Sad Puppy campaign has been going on for three years now, but last year featured the more radical Rabid Puppies led by Vox Day whose initial goal was to burn down the Hugo awards.  The Sad Puppies had to ask Vox to hold back, so he did.  And the SJW Toristas burned down the awards anyway.  This year should be even more amusing to observe.
• Already the alternative Right is gaining ground in many areas.  Many of their ideas have gained prominence already in more mainstream publications such as Brietbart and Prison Planet.  The fight against feminism has grown more and more significant as time passes.  More and more people are really starting to question the communist Narrative that has dominated the culture for decades.
• Donald Trump has been dominating the polls, for the most part, and the Republican primaries and caucuses are about to begin this month.  Should he win, we will see him win the presidency because all the Democrats have is an ugly old tranny, a self-described Socialist, and a failed governor of Maryland.
• The Deadpool movie.  Seriously, it looks like a lot of fun.
• I think the second season of Attack on Titan comes out this year.  Last I checked anyway.
• The increasing awareness that our leaders are selling out us and our children for a bunch of third-world retards.  As they push the envelope more and more, we will see the rise of nationalist movements in Europe effectively dissolving the EU and a surge of nationalism in the United States.  What the results of this will be should be interesting.  But the worse case scenario will not be the takeover by foreign invaders.
• The debt deflation will really kick off this year.  Well, at least I’m hoping it does and if the price of oil is any indication, it will.

There is a lot to do, no doubt, and everyone should contribute as best they can.  But I have new hope for this year for Western culture.

Cruelty

There is nothing crueler than a child.  It’s an old saying I guess.  I mean I heard it on Cowboy Bebop but I assume it comes from older wisdom.

When I hear about children who murder other children, it is particularly upsetting.  The case in the UK where those two boys killed that two-year-old is particularly upsetting to me, maybe because I have a two-year-old myself and because they made that kid’s life a living hell for the rest of his life.

And yet we have all these morons who claim that children are not responsible for their actions.  That children like that should just be locked up.

I say that children who commit murder should be treated like anyone else who commits murder: they should be executed.

The same with the crazy people.  I don’t know when this “insanity” defense came about, but it makes no sense.  The best thing you can do for other people is to judge people based on their actions and respond accordingly.  In matters of justice, this involves restitution.

And when it comes to murder, the perpetrators life is forfeit.

I don’t care about age, race, gender, or sexuality.  I don’t care about the perpetrator’s past as an abuse victim.

Justice demands death for the act of murder.

To do otherwise is cruelty to humanity.

Against Anti-Racism

Being anti-racist is tyrannical. Then again, anything that becomes standard government policy amounts to tyranny eventually.

Racism is the belief that one race is superior to another race purely because of race.  Honestly, going on that definition, it is hard to logically come up with a reason to be anti-racist, especially in light of genetic science reinforcing racial differences.

In essence, I see the difference races as sub-species more so than simply people with different skin color.  Notice I said “sub-species”, not “sub-human”.  We are all human but our genetics do determine a lot about us.

Yes, horrible things have been done in the name of racism.  And also horrible things have been done in the name of science, religion, communism, and for no real reason at all.  In fact, if we go by body count, atheism and communism has racism beat.  Better a racist than a communist.  You’re less genocidal that way.

But people who are going out of their way to either end racism or prove they aren’t racist are either fighting a losing battle or infringing on the civil rights of others.

One of the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights in the United States is freedom of association.  What this means that you are allowed to associate with any person you desire to associate with.  That include racist groups.  They are allowed to meet, rally, and party as much as they want, provided they bring no harm to anyone else’s life, liberty, or property.

I do not care for racist groups, whether they are white, black, Hispanic, or whatever else.  I couldn’t care less about what they do, provided they don’t harm others in any way.  Once they do bring harm to others, that is when I will call for justice.  Justice is blind to race, creed, and social standing.  At least that is the idea.

And I think that is the central point: it wasn’t racism that was the real problem with the South, it was that their governments had embraced it to the point that they were willing to allow racist groups murder, rape, and pillage other people who weren’t part of their race.  Because their governments, which were supposed to represent law and order, didn’t fulfill their duty, it became a real problem.

We are supposed to be considered equal under the law.  The law is supposed to be applied equally to every person regardless of race, gender, or ideology.  Instead we see the anti-racists pushing an agenda that specifically targets a certain race, gender, and ideology.  Ironically these people are usually of the same race and gender.

Personally, I don’t see much necessity in racism.  I judge people by their actions, not their race.

And judging by the actions of the anti-racists, I’d rather be on the opposite side of them than on the same side.  They disgust me.