Showing posts with label liberalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liberalism. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

The Soulless Communists Get Crazier

So a gay Muslim walks into a bar, murders about 50 of them, and then is killed in a confrontation with the police, who arrived three hours later I might add.  The gay bar was celebrating “La Raza”, by the way, so not only are these degenerates celebrating their ability to suck dick, but also celebrating open racism against whites.

You can imagine that I have very little sympathy for degenerate hedonists and hostile barbarians.  I wonder if this is a sign of God’s judgment on our increasingly degenerate society?  Seriously, what if it was?

The communists have all gone completely and utterly nuts though in the wake of this incident.  We have calls for gun control, which is typical, and no calls for border control or Islam control, which is to be expected.

But then we have commies who are saying this shooting is the fault of Christian, white, straight men.  Or that all religions are equally oppressive against gays.

A brief and cursory glance at the history of Christianity yields very little in the way of massive witch-hunts for homosexuals, unless you count actual witches among them.  Hell, the prime examples I can think of are the Marque de Sade and Oscar Wilde and neither man brought the death penalty on himself for their sodomite behavior.

In more modern times, the worse you can say that a Christian group has done to gays is hold up a sign that “God Hates Fags”, which might have been an anti-smoking rally, I don’t know.

But Muslims have gone out of their way to target homosexuals with death.  From throwing them off of buildings to shooting them with bullets, Muslims seem to get off on killing gay men.

But what about Uganda?  Didn’t Christian Uganda pass a law making sodomy punishable by death?

No, they didn’t.  They pass a law that made acts of sodomy punishable by death IF the victim was a child or disabled person and only if the victim contracted AIDS as a result.

Didn’t Russia pass anti-gay legislation?  Yes.  They passed a law that outlaws gay pride parades and teaching sodomy to children in public schools.

In both cases, neither secular nor Christian governments made being a giant cocksucker punishable by death.

Meanwhile, a two-year-old boy was mauled to death by an alligator while his family was vacating at a Disney resort.  Yes, the family of the boy did something stupid in that there was no swimming signs and it was late in the day.

But the commies took to the Internet to brag about how much they didn’t care because the boy was white.

Yes, that’s right.  Communists hate white children and want to see them all dead.

I’m not a man of violence.  I abhor it, especially as I get older.  But every day I read about this kind of insanity and I fear for my life as a Christian, white, straight man and the lives of my family.

The communist death squads are coming soon.  Be prepared is all I can say.

Sunday, January 3, 2016

The Enemy of the WSM

White straight men are the current devils of the Western world.  According to the Narrative, WSM are responsible for all the evils of the world, largely because we promote capitalism, have normal sex, and raise families.

The ironic thing is, most of the critics of WSM are WSM themselves.  That means that most of the people who are calling out the white straight men for being racist, homophobic, etc. are themselves the very thing they hate.

Of course, the third law of the SJW, SJWs always project, comes to mind.  But maybe it is deeper than that.

You see, I’ve noticed a trend amongst the communists, especially those who are white, straight, and male.

They are failures in life.  At best they are mediocre artists who desire the great fame of artists long dead.  Very few reach any level of fame.  Some exceptions are the likes of George R. R. Martin who appears to have gotten famous for writing his own version of The Lord of the Rings minus the midgets, the evil ring, and any semblance of hope.  Add in the inherent violence and rape of nihilism and bam you have a “good” story.

The truth is, the WSM who turn on their own kind are in fact narcissists who cannot handle life without a bunch of sycophants licking their metaphorical assholes.

What I’ve found is that most people try to 1-Up each other in the self-righteous contest.  So we have WSM betraying their own kind in order to appear to be better than other WSM who might actually be productive citizens of their respective nations.

And this is really what it is all about.  It is about feeling an undeserving level of self-righteousness combined with a need to have a bunch of ass-lickers validate it.

To be honest, there isn’t much that can be done about these people or their idiotic followers.  What we can do, however, is expose these little assholes for what they are.  Once most normal people see what the feminists really are about, what the SJWs really are about, what the LGBT movement is really about, and what the rest of the communists are really about, we will see a huge shift to the Right.

It has already started though.  With the rise of forced gay marriage photography and cakes, a greater awareness of how lopsided the divorce system is, and an understanding of how Christianity, the super-majority religion in the United States, is under extreme ideological assault, it may not be much longer for this to happen.

Just pick your side carefully when it does.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

The Unmen Among Us

In the past, I have written about the moral code of the Left.  Basically, it boils down to classes, where people of a certain class are able to commit horrible crimes while people of another are not allowed to do so.  When you apply this standard, the logical conclusion is to demonize those of us in the other class.

This is why hate crimes are considered more heinous than their equivalents when done by members of a minority class.  So when you read or hear about black people murdering and/or raping other people, even non-black people, you do not get the same response from the Left as when a group of white people hurls the word “niggar” at a black person.

Indeed, women and minorities can do no wrong in the eyes of the Left.  Unless, of course, they refuse to tow the ideological line of the Left, which usually involves honoring the overlords of Leftist thought and a hatred of human liberty.  Then they are considered to be part of the majority.  For the Left, race and gender are attitudes and behaviors, not necessarily genetic, which is something that science supports.

I won’t argue that the Leftist is a science-denier, because they will use science to work in their favor.  Like any other ideological group, if it favors their ideals, then it holds up in their ideology.  To deny them is to be a science-denier, despite the fact that the do deny science when it suits them.

An example of this is the idea of transgender individuals.  According to genetic science, most people or either male or female.  Yes, there are abnormalities, but those instances are incredibly rare and usually such people are female.

But most people who are transgender, claim that their genetic code is wrong and that they “feel” like they are of another gender.  The Left currently supports these claims, despite our advanced knowledge of genetics and the mapping of the human genome.

In other words, knowledge is meant to serve them in their minds, not change their minds.  This is the very essence of the Unman, the demon-possessed scientists in C.S. Lewis’ Perelandra, who used its wit and vast knowledge merely as a tool.  When it wasn’t tempting the queen to defy God, it was behaving like a small sociopathic child brutally torturing the animals.

That is the way the Leftist thinks and feels.  They may be well-read, intelligent, and generally likable.  But this is a mask.  Left on their own, they behave like rabid, abhorrent animals.  We see cracks of this once in a while when they do performance art where women will menstruate on canvas or men will place a cross in a jar of urine (here’s a hint: it isn’t art if everybody can do it).

They are so full of hatred, paranoia, envy, greed, and pride that anything good or wholesome is oppressive to them because it is supported by those not like them.

If evolution were true (I am an evolution skeptic), then it would be in our interest as a species to out-breed them, out think them, and ultimately banish them to some other continent and see what creatures they become in a million years.  But that would be inhuman and the vast majority of us who see these people look upon them with pity, not hatred or contempt.

Yes, their actions are contemptible, like when they got rid of health insurance plans so everyone could afford them, but they themselves are to be pitied.  They are broken people, wicked to the core but at the same time desperate to get out without knowing how.

So when you encounter a Leftist, be sure to not hold them in contempt.  Don’t let them get away with their contemptible actions, but remember that they are the Unmen among us.

Friday, October 31, 2014

The Moral Code of the Left

It has been said that the Leftists do not have an objective morality or rather that they do not abide by one.  This is usually a criticism brought about by people on the Right as a form rational disqualification in order to explain to their followers why Leftists do what they do.

I argue that no group of people can have an 100% subjective moral code.  You either will have an objective moral code or will be entirely immoral.

I don’t believe that the Left is immoral either.  Not in the sense that they lack an objective moral code anyway.  I believe that they have an objective moral code, but it is one that is alien to the common Judeo-Christian morality and so it appears to be immoral.

In truth, their morality is derived from the power and influence of a collective elite, not from a philosophical standard or religious decree.  Yes, it does adjust itself from time to time, but this is because the elite changes the rules as they see fit.

Feminism, for example, was largely a racist philosophy back in the day (like turn of the last century).  Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, spoke at Ku Klux Klan rallies and wanted abortion legalized in order to eliminate the Negro population.

As the civil rights movement took hold in the 50s and 60s, we saw a shift in Leftists attitudes and so today opponents of feminism are often labeled as both misogynists and racists.

The Leftist morality starts with the sin of envy.  The entire foundation of their moral code is one based in that savage vice that seeks to destroy those who have accomplishments and talent.  The power elite in Leftists circles always starts with envy in mind in order to rally their dumb masses.

Everything about their standards is about being a victim.  Ever since Leftism first gained significant political influence, the highest virtue one could hold was being a victim.  You were a victim of the business owner.  You were a victim of sexism.  Of racism.  Of whatever new form of collective injustice they can think up.

So to move up in the ranks and obtain power within the Leftist hierarchy, one only need to play the victim card as much as possible.  The sad thing is, though, is that the true power brokers behind the movement really don’t give a damn about their followers.  For them, it is about taking power away from those who have it.

This moral code is much less rigid than the moral code of the common man.  It allows for just about any kind of vice to be made into a virtue provided the victim label is stamped on it and approved by the overlords of Leftism.  That is why they will support sexual deviancy and even promote it.  The overlords have decreed that gays are an oppressed group (never mind that they have never been segregated, lynched, or otherwise ostracized to the degree that other groups were) and so promoting them and praising them for their ability to suck cock is a moral good.

So for those of use who are not living under their moral code, we must understand that they have a moral code; that it is just so alien to us that it appears to be immoral.  If they were completely immoral degenerates, then they would have never gained any traction in any political movement at all.  And right now they control nearly all forms of entertainment and nearly all major government agencies.  Immoral people could not achieve that.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Contrarian Busybodies

They exist in their own world where everything that anyone else does is wrong no matter what and they are here to fix things.  If they believed in God, they’d believe that God put them on Earth to fix what is wrong with the world.

They go by different names as the time goes by.  This is usually because the names they use become derogatory, despite being positive and uplifting.  Ever wonder why the term “progressive” in the US is now a negative term?  Or liberal?  Hell, even Social Justice Warrior is becoming derogatory.

The main principle behind the contrarian busybodies is that they must defy everything that is mainstream or viewed as widely accepted.  Take any topic and they will bash the overlords in charge of it for some reason or another.

For example, the US now has a black President (he’s half-white, but that half doesn’t count).  Given that the majority of the US is white (like 70% or more last I checked), you would think that this would be an end to the charge of racism against whites.  But that hasn’t stopped.  Instead we see racial divisions ramped up.  These black teens running rampant, robbing stores and beating random people (usually white), is indicative of a racially disenfranchised group.

Video games have come under attack lately.  Certain groups of people with a huge chip on their shoulder have complained about the portrayal of women in video games.  Now, video games have been largely a boy’s or man’s hobby.  Most of the games that women play are the simple puzzle games like Tetris or Bejeweled.  And while men play them too, they tend to go for more interactive and immersive games.

So naturally women aren’t always portrayed as strong, independent females as dictated by the ancient tenants of the Goddess.  Never mind that there are depictions of strong female warriors dating back to Metroid for Nintendo (or possibly even further).  That doesn’t matter.

The point is that contrarian busybodies will never be happy or satisfied.  This is because their entire life is consumed by pride and envy, which cripples their thinking patterns and causes them to not process reality in the same way that most people do.  This wouldn’t be a huge problem except that they also tend to get into positions of power with the drive to implement their delusional policies and force everyone to follow suit.

There is no compromise with them.  Do not make any attempt to appease them.  They view it as a weakness, not as a kindness.  They view every action you take through the lens of their own narrow vision.  They are incapable of recognizing acts of kindness from people who do not agree with them 100%.  They view it as an attack because that is exactly how they would behave if the roles were reversed.

So have nothing to do with them.  If you are an employer, fire anyone who acts up demanding equal pay or more minorities in the office.  If you are a business person, consider dropping clients who work toward such things.  And if there is one in your family, don’t let them watch your children or spend the night in your house.

You will find that life is so much better without these miserable miscreants.  And a lot quieter too.

Monday, September 8, 2014

Are You Ready For Some Politically Left FOOTBALL!?!

In yet more proof that American football is no longer the territory of masculinity, the Baltimore Ravens have dropped Ray Rice.  All for the crime of defending himself from being attacked by his then girlfriend (and now current wife).

I have long lost interest in football, beyond a passing one, as it no longer excites me.  And now that the NFL is literally telling people it is illegal to talk about the games without their consent and making their players wear pink to raise breast cancer awareness, I’ve found that my lost interest was not unjustified.

Modern football is nothing more than a cheap distraction to sell junk to gullible morons.  How does a one-hour game take three hours?  Could it have something to do with their “Sprint Halftime Reports” or their cuts to commercial breaks after just about every play?

And now in the latest in the soap opera that is the NFL, a player defended himself from a physically aggressive wife.  And the politically correct Leftists who run the NFL decided to make an example out of him and dropped him.

Look, I’m not saying that Ray Rice is a saint.  But his woman isn’t an angel either.  She was dumb enough to attack a professional athlete without any thought to the repercussions.  I’m in good shape myself and I’m not that stupid.

The fact is, when it comes to domestic violence, men and women are equals except in one regard: women are more likely to send their men to the hospital than men are.  This is a statistical fact because more often than not, a man will not fight back except to maybe try and catch the hot frying pan that is heading for his head.

Janay Palmer may have thought that Ray Rice wouldn’t hit her back.  That was her mistake.  And she paid for it.  Many women do make that mistake when they get into an emotional fit and attack something stronger and faster than they will ever hope to be.

Because Leftism has infiltrated nearly every popular institution in the United States, we now have NFL owners dropping players because of alleged domestic abuse.  I know that the NFL can impose their own rules on their players regardless of the law.

But I can also impose my own rules on the NFL by not participating in their bullshit.  You should too.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism is a sham.  It always has been, always will be.  At best, it is merely a bunch of white elites trying to find redemption with the minority classes they revere so much.  Yet, when it comes down to reality, they can’t even accept that some cultures may have differences that are the exact opposite of their values.

The progressive Left is especially guilty of this conceit.  They like to think of themselves of tolerant of others, no matter where they come from, but have you ever met someone more intolerant than a progressive Leftist?  They literally cannot conceive that there are people who are both sane and disagree with them.

This is why they drove Brendon Eich out of Mozilla.  They could not conceive of a man who has a valid disagreement with their own moral code.  And so they chased him out of a company he helped build.  Indeed, Brendon Eich created (or helped create) Javascript, literally making the modern web page as versatile as it is today.  But his accomplishments do not matter, his own sanity is in question to the Left.

Likewise, when it comes to foreign governments or foreign cultures, they cannot abide by unacceptable standards in other cultures as well.  One of their twisted standards is that women do not get to reap the consequences of their bad choices.  Take this recent article on women in Tunisia where women there are forced to cover up the fact that they are not virgins to their spouses due to societal pressures.

But we can’t have that, can we?  Leftists need women to be treated like the goddesses they are and to allow them the freedom to do whatever they want without accepting the consequences of their actions.  This is one of the core values of the progressive Left.

So when one of these core values conflicts with a cultural value of a completely different nation and culture, they throw fits.  They write nasty articles or sob stories about it.  They cut funding.  They get people to resign.  In some cases, violence is used, although this is usually under the guise of the legal use of force from the State.

Back to multiculturalism.  It is the idea that our nation can have many different cultures living together in unity and harmony.  In reality, it is just smokescreen for winning power over the majority group in this country.  The best way to get rid of the majority is to get all the minority groups together and outvote the majority.  This is best done by massive immigration, fast-tracks to citizenship, and calling people racist if they disagree.

The people at the top are not idiots.  They do not care about the common person, be they white, Hispanic, Asian, or (especially if they’re) black.  Male or female, they don’t care, so long as you give them more and more power.  Multiculturalism is nothing more than a power game being played by the progressive Left.

The United States already had multiple cultures before the influx of immigrates.  The differences between a Virginian and a New Yorker were as different as an American and a Chinese man.  The Secession War (or the ‘Civil’ War for you history revisionists) was all about a clash of cultures.  And in some of these foreign cultures, which we are importing now, we see actual wars being waged between two people whose only difference is really just what tribe they were born into.

I remember a poster I saw in my High School building as I was standing in line to graduate.  It read “Unity Through Diversity”.  It was very quaint but I asked cute teacher (she was maybe 5-10 years older than me at the time) how that was possible?  Both concepts are contradictions and they do not go together.  Diversity does not create unity, it creates chaos, which is not always a bad thing.  She just stared blankly at the poster and then escorted us out to the ceremony.

This is the problem with multiculturalism: it doesn’t work.  The best way for it to work is for each community to establish themselves within their own sphere.  Even in big cities like New York we see this happening.  There is nothing wrong with it.  It is more about preserving the peace and working together.  The progressive Left, on the other hand, wants nothing to do with such notions and instead seeks to disrupt things because these are people who should be like them.

You know, empty, irritable, and malicious.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Leftism Is Envy As A Political Movement

The primary vice of women is Envy.  It is also the primary vice of the Leftist:

Exactly. It's 12 million people, about a third of which will end up paying more under this law. And that as you said in the introductions sort of the idea. We currently have a highly discriminatory system where if you’re sick, if you’ve been sick or [if] you’re going to get sick, you cannot get health insurance.

The only way to end that discriminatory system is to bring everyone into the system and pay one fair price. That means that the genetic winners, the lottery winners who've been paying an artificially low price because of this discrimination now will have to pay more in return. And that, by my estimate, is about four million people. In return, we'll have a fixed system where over 30 million people will now for the first time be able to access fairly price and guaranteed health insurance.

Communism is a cancer that is built upon the deadly sin of envy.  The reality of the world is that no one is equal.  Equality is a myth and it is something that will never, ever be achieved by human hands.  I doubt that equality will be the status quo in the next life as well.

The fact is, some people were born with superior genes and are superior to others in many ways.  I’m only slightly above average when it comes to intelligence quotient and my physical body leaves something to be desired, although I have gotten more physically in shape in the past.  I am a natural introvert which hampers me in this modern age of mass communication and the perceived need for social interaction.

At the same time, while I desire a better body, I have come to accept that this is what I am and that I need to work within the parameters that God has provided me.  This does not mean I have given up on reaching my full potential.

The Left, on the other hand, strives to harm people in the name of equality.  They are obsessed with it to the point where people who do stand, who are better than most other people, and who are not part of their group are considered enemies to be vanquished.   Notice how this M.I.T. asshat whom I have quoted seems to forget that superior health insurance is being reserved for top politicians and politically favored unions.  Some men are more equal than others.

While the political Right has often been accused of being greedy (and to some extent, the charges are true), the political Left has never once been accused of being envious.  It is high time that people start calling out this evil that has been made a political movement so that we can all avoid the coming genocide.  History has proven that Leftists are prone to murder those who do not conform to their group and there are plenty of people her in America who are willing to continue their long tradition of mass murder.

Monday, February 6, 2012

When you have no God, you believe in anything

The problem I have with modern secular leftists is that they completely lack any sense of history, logic, or downright common sense.  Case in point, here is an illustration:

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Who Holds the Monopoly on Reason?

There are essentially three distinct competing ideologies in the United States these days.  There are the Leftists, the Conservatives, and the libertarians.  All three have a their own distinct beliefs and while there are some overlapping, they are for the most part the three different movements.  Not all three are equal in size and influence on the average voter, but all like to believe that they hold some monopoly on reason.
For liberals, or Leftists, they tend to believe that they are the only side that makes sense and usually most independent observers will say that these people are largely crazy.  But that wasn’t always true.  Back during the turn of the century, Leftists in America were mostly intellectual-types, but largely had more grounding in practical matters.  Karl Marx even understood the fundamental laws of economics and formulated his own brand of Leftism based on those conceptions.
Ultimately, as the Left became more and more influential, they became less and less reasonable.  Many radical Leftists, like the remnants of the rich white people who called themselves “Weathermen”, turned out to be nothing more than homicidal maniacs.  I guess that’s what I have to do in order to win a professorship without having a real degree.  In any event, it’s quite clear to me that the left has never been reasonable, at least since when the Soviets took power.
The conservatives often portray themselves as reasonable or holding some higher rational ground when it comes to debating.  But I have yet to meet a conservative who didn’t vote Republican in spite of the evidence that Republicans generally don’t care about conservative ideas.  I think they tend to suffer from some kind of battered wife syndrome because they are always duped into voting for a RINO believing that the lesser of two evils is better than the greater.  I’m pretty sure that God said all sin means death though, so they have a screwed viewpoint on evil.
Libertarians tend to believe themselves to hold the monopoly on reason these days as well.  Heck, one of the most popular online magazines libertarians have is called Reason.  But I don’t believe them to have any more sense than the rest.  For one thing, many libertarians tend to take the liberals' logic when it comes to anti-war policies, which is usually irrational, and some even have a serious anti-military bent.  I tend to view the military with a certain level of neutrality.  To me, they are more like having a condom in your wallet (if you are non-religious) in I don’t want to use them if I don’t have to.  Libertarians also tend to view human beings as rational beings, which is a foolish stance to take in my view.
I believe that none of these ideologies has any more hold on reason than anyone else.  All sides exhibit levels of irrational logic, although some much more than others, and so I don’t delude myself into believe that because this person is a libertarian, he must be making sense or that this person is a liberal and makes no sense.  When it comes down to it, reason is nothing more than a tool to fit your own beliefs.  While it can prove the legitimacy of your arguments, that does not mean that the other side isn’t able to do so as well.
I recommend that anyone reading or listening to anyone with a political message make sure it fits with your own beliefs and if it doesn’t, analyze why.  This does not mean you should stop reading or listening to them, but that you have a responsibility to yourself to understand what they are saying and be ready to not swallow their supposed logic whole.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

No, There Will Be Health Care Rationing and Higher Taxes

I found this wonderful speech from Robert Reich, an advisor to President Obama.  I first heard it on Jerry Doyle’s show, but a simple youtube.com search made it an easy find:

It is really funny when liberals do speeches to other liberals.  When they talk to people they know and trust, they tend to be open and honest about what they desire and what they really want.  Here, Robert Reich, a Socialist, is speaking at Berkeley about how they not only have to lie to the American people, but that they openly admit what conservatives and Republicans have been accusing them of wanting all along.
And yet, the mainstream media, predictably, refuses to even consider the possibility that one Obama’s advisors really does want the elderly to die sooner because it costs the state more to keep them alive.  He openly admits to wanting all of us young people to pay for the elderly.
It is bad enough that people like me have to pay huge sums of money each year to fund retirement and medical expenses for the elderly.  I honestly would not mind if the program was set up to cover only my parents or grandparents.  But Social Security and Medicare is about taking money from productive young people and redistributing it to the lazy elderly.  Yes, the elderly who are living solely on Social Security and Medicare are lazy because they are not really retired.  Retirement is when work becomes optional and that is only achieved when you are no longer dependent on income from an outside source, but have your own source of savings and investments to cover your expenses for the rest of your life.
Notice, though, that he also said, essentially, that they are going to let you die instead of being a burden on all of us young people.  Sadly, I do not think that the young, who are overtaxed at it is, would object to this because we are tired of paying for your retirement anyway.
This is the liberal agenda for us, although I suspect this is the tip of the iceberg.  What I find most disgusting about it all is that Robert Reich openly admits that they have to lie in order to push their agenda forward.
If any solution, good or bad, requires that you lie and deceive in order to obtain it, then it is not worth doing.  Any person of integrity and solid moral character would know this and refrain from using such despicable tactics.
The wicked truly have control of the Whitehouse and Congress.