Showing posts with label judicial policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label judicial policy. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

How To Avoid Being Brock Turner

Brock Turner is the unfortunate victim of what amounts to a feminist judicial system.  For those of you who don’t know, he was a Freshman college student who got drunk with a Senior girl, walked out with her to a dumpster, and fingered her.  He stopped when he realized she was passed out but that didn’t stop a couple of white knights from tackling him and calling the police.

The girl in question, who continues to remain anonymous to protect her honor and not get charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, immediately agreed she was raped in her drunken state when she woke up.  She had a boyfriend you see and she didn’t want to her reputation tarnished by a silly one night stand.  After all, slut-shaming is countered by rape accusations.

A judge decided that while Brock didn’t commit rape, he did employ poor judgment in his inebriated state and for the crime of not having too many inhibitions and being with what I assume is an attractive woman, he was sentenced to six months in prison.  He got out on parole in three for good behavior, having little access to alcohol or women.

Unfortunately, Brock is now a legal sex offender, which means he can’t go near children ever again, nevermind that the “victim” in this case was older than him.  I’ve known people who narrowly avoided getting on the sex offender list for simply urinating on their own lawn, so at this point such a list is probably a joke were it not backed by the full force and violence of the Federal government.

Is this unfair?  Yes.  Is it tragic?  Yes.  Should Brock Turner be punished for his entire life?  No.

But the sad fact is, there is nothing that can be done.  The legal system is thoroughly feminized and caters to women more often than not.  It is a wonder that all men are locked up right now with a select few let out periodically to be used a bulls in order to perpetuate the human race.  The SCUM Manifesto seems to be gradually being enacted in our nation.

But what can be done?

There are few things that you can do, besides voting for the most racist, bigoted, insane leader you can find, which can reverse these trends.

For one thing, don’t college if you don’t need to.  Unless you are seeking a major in Technology or Engineering, you are wasting your time and money.  Instead, either go out and find a job or go to a trade school.  Either way, you should have no trouble finding something that will pay well eventually and at the same time reward hard work.

But if you do find yourself going to college, I suggest you do the following:

  • Don’t go out partying.
  • Don’t consume alcohol while on campus or anywhere near one, even if you’re not a college student.
  • Don’t host a party.
  • Don’t join a fraternity.
  • Don’t interact with any woman while on campus or nearby a college campus.  If you find that you have to, simply keep your answers simple and make no physical contact.  Record all interactions as well with your phone.
  • Don’t trust the police or any other authority figure to do what is right and just.  Instead, keep your damn mouth shut and always demand a lawyer be present when dealing with any kind of legal wrangle, even a parking ticket.
  • Be a creepy loner.  Nobody will notice you and nobody will want to be around you.

Will this make you a pariah?  Yes, but you have to understand that you already are a pariah, especially if you are a white, straight man.  Simply focus on your studies, view sex, drugs, and everything else that goes on as nothing more than mindless distractions you can’t be bothered with.  Get your degree and get out.

In the real world, you will have plenty of opportunity to employ Game techniques and get access to sex and women.  Because in the real world, drunken party sex isn’t considered a crime and women are treated a little less like spoiled girls with no free will of their own.

If employed correctly, young men will starve women of the attention many of these crazy chicks desire and make college an uninteresting and boring place for academic again.

We can only hope.

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

You Have the Right to Remain Silent…On Facebook

There is a reason that our nation was founded on principles of limited government.  This is because State power always have dominant privileges over the common man by the sheer force that they can exert on individuals and businesses alone.  When left unchecked, such power means trumping all freedoms that man was meant to naturally enjoy.

In our modern world, this has become ever more crucial as the justice system seems to favor prosecutors over defense attorneys all the time:

U.S. courts have a structural bias against “guilty” verdicts, but when it comes to Facebook data the situation is reversed: Social media activity is more readily used to convict you in a court of law than to defend you.

That’s because prosecutors generally have an easier time than defense attorneys getting private information out of Facebook and other social networks, as highlighted in an ongoing Portland murder case. In that case, the defense attorney has evidence of a Facebook conversation in which a key witness reportedly tells a friend he was pressured by police into falsely incriminating the defendant.

Facebook rebuffed the defense attorney’s subpoena seeking access to the conversation, citing the federal Stored Communications Act, which protects the privacy of electronic communications like e-mail – but which carves out an exemption for law enforcement, thus assisting prosecutors. “It’s so one-sided … they cooperate 110 percent anytime someone in the government asks for information,” one Oregon attorney told the Portland Oregonian, citing a separate case in which Facebook withheld conversations that could have disproved a rape charge, but turned over the same conversations when the prosecution demanded them.

Other defense attorneys voice similar complaints, and the judge in the murder case went so far as to call Facebook “flippant” and “frustrating” in its handling of the defense’s subpoenas. Facebook, for its part, has said it is inundated with judicial requests and tries to handle them uniformly within the confines of the law.

The trouble, it would seem, is that the law itself is not so uniform. As more and more communication shifts onto social networks like Facebook, the pro-prosecution bias of the Stored Communications Act is going to look less like a peculiar legislative oversight and more like a frightening erosion of the right to a fair trial. And if Facebook and its competitors want people to share more freely online, they should use their lobbying resources to fix that particular law.

When the police tell you that you have a right to remain silent and that anything you say can be used against you in a court of law, what they mean is that the police can never, ever testify on your behalf, but only to convict to you.  This is why you do not talk to cops, on duty or otherwise, as the entire justice system has become heavily weighed in the favor of the State rather than the people.

And now, this applies to Facebook as well.  Apparently, the social media site crumbles whenever a prosecutor requests information relevant to his or her cases but when a defense attorney requests it, suddenly it’s an invasion of privacy.  I don’t blame the Facebook administrators for doing what they do; they are more than likely coerced by the full power of the State which backs up the prosecutor.  A defense attorney is simply an independent lawyer who has to play by the rules that the rest of the peons have to as well.

This is why there is a severe need for massive judicial reform at all levels.  Laws need to be repealed and the prosecutors need to be severely limited in what they can do when making a case against a defendant.  Unfortunately, due to the massive amount of cop dramas and courtroom dramas that have gained prominence in the past couple of decades, people have been brainwashed into thinking that the State’s cronies can do no wrong and that even if there are some bad apples, they are taken down like a regular criminal.

From what I’ve seen with the real world, that is not at all how it works.