Nowhere To Run

 A few days ago, local police in Idaho arrested around 30 men for the horrible crime of going to protest a drag show in a public park.

And while the whole thing appears to be a staged operation by the Deep State to make right-wingers look like the hatemongers they probably should be at this point, it brought up an interesting point: why was there a drag show in northern Idaho?

Seriously, Idaho is supposed to be the mostest conservative place ever, where those filthy degenerate commies won't dare tread.

And the local police protected those degenerate commies from a false flag operation.

It sure is a good thing all those Californians fled to Idaho in order to homeschool and homestead.  That sure showed the murderous pedophiles whose boss.

Uh-oh.  I think I just hurt a lot of people's feelings there.  Please understand that I have nothing against homeschooling and homesteading.  In fact, I think it's awesome when people do those things.

My problem is that people actually think that they're fighting back against globohomo by doing all these things.  You are not.  You are, at best, on the defense while the evil grows all around your tiny little piece of land that the government only allows you "own" because you pay property taxes.

Twenty years ago, going the homesteading and homeschooling route would have been perfectly fine defiance.

Now, not so much.  Right now, we are facing down the largest evil that the world has ever seen.  It is highly organized, it has seduced millions of people, and it wants to see your children raped and murdered.

And you think they'll stop at your property line?

Moving to Idaho didn't stop them.  Pulling your kids from government skools didn't stop them.  And it is only a matter of time before they start declaring that homeschoolers are mentally ill and take your kids away.  Then they'll say that your land needs to be confiscated for the collective good.

And you'll think you can stop them with your guns.  But in the end, you'll just wind up in jail or dead with no one giving a flying fuck what happened.  And your kids will end up in the foster care system.  You can guess what happens from there.

Stop sitting on the sidelines and get involved.  Go to local supervisor meetings and school board meetings.  Hell, run for those positions and replace the people there.  If you're a homeschooler, then you're overqualified for the school board.  If you're a homesteader, then you're overqualified for a county supervisor position.

But you have to get involved in local politics.  You have to step up, make local friends, and be a community activist.

Don't build a new community.  Be a better neighbor and fight for God.  You have nowhere to run and nowhere to hide.  The battle is here and now.

Because, again, if they have pro-butt sex rallies protected by the local police in Northern Idaho, then they are everywhere.

On Debt

Despite what most mainstream economists will tell you, there are actually three different types of debt and all three affect a nation’s economy in different ways.  Usually when you hear reports about debts, at best they’ll break it down into two types: public and private sector.  But that’s not a good enough breakdown in my view as I hope you will see as well.

The first kind of debt is government debt or public sector debt.  This is the debt that is usually derived from government entities selling bonds on the market in order to fill in the revenue gaps they create due to reckless spending.  This debt is expected to be paid off by the children of the taxpayer and is often referred to as the collective debt of the people.

This debt is often hard to get rid of.  This is usually because most government officials aren’t really that responsible when it comes to budgeting and don’t really care about managing the money they’ve been entrusted through taxation well.

The problem with this kind of debt is that eventually, the bill does come due and sooner rather than later.  More the likely, if a nation has a massive amount of debt that exceeds its production, defaulting on that debt is sure to follow along with bonds becoming worthless.

The second kind of debt is consumer debt.  This is debt related to home mortgages, car loans, credit cards, and any other form of debt that is accessed directly by an individual for the purposes of meeting a consumable need.

While seen as a good thing by the vast majority of financial gurus and economists, this debt is really like masturbating now versus putting work in and attracting a wife.  I know that’s a bit crude to say, but the long-term effects of this kind of debt can be highly damaging.

For one thing, whatever product is purchased using consumer loans will inevitably, and drastically, inflate in cost down the road.  As the supply of said product remains constant, the demand will rise as more and more consumers will have access to that product.

Look at housing in the US.  By all accounts, housing should probably cost one-third of what it is today but because people can get away with no down-payments (or practically none) and 30-year mortgages (or half your wasted life), housing prices have skyrocketed.

The same is true for college tuition.  As student loans become more and more available, more students are attending and thus prices go up.

You see where this is going, right?  With inflated prices, especially on products and services with very specific and easy-to-get loans, there has to be a default on those things eventually.  Because eventually, consumers don’t bother signing their lives away.

The final type of debt is productive debt.  This usually takes the form of business loans and are designed to give a business an edge in the market by providing a quick infusion of cash in order to make it happen.  Corporate debts can get out of hand of course, but if kept to meet some business needs and are paid off with the profits gained from production, this usually isn’t a problem.

The banks in this country used to focus primarily on productive debt.  They would “invest” in private companies in order to give them a chance to grow.  But around the 1960s to early 1970s, they started to sell credit cards, buy and trade on people’s mortgages, and create longer and longer mortgage terms.

This has had a spiraling effect on the economy with consumer debt rising drastically over the past few decades.  Sooner or later, something is going to break big time and when it does, deflation will occur.  Your investments will be worthless and you might lose your job.

But on the flip side, you’ll be able to afford things again without going into debt.  Of course, you won’t have much choice in the matter and there won’t be as much to buy.

To All The Left-Wing Crazies Responding to the Manchester Attack

There was a nail bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England, in case you haven’t been paying attention.  And you know what?  I don’t care.

This is what happens when you let the barbarians in.  They either attack you or they breed soldiers to attack you.  It happened in Rome and it has happened to many civilizations all over.  This is how civilizations fall.  They get displaced by less degenerate, though still r-selected populations who basically wreck your shit, rape your women, and murder your children.

It’s a story as old as history itself really.

So please, tell me how electing a Muslim mayor prevented this.  Tell me how hate crime laws stop this.  Explain to me how massive immigration prevents this.

Tell me how we should all just live together when Muslims have openly stated they will murder us for engaging in free speech about their death-cult of a religion.

Explain to me how not being racist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-Christian moves civilization forward in any meaningful sense?

The truth you can’t, you won’t, and you’ll just angrily rant about how I’m angry, mean, a racist, a bigot, etc.

I want a better nation for my children.

You just want to fuck in the butt.  Given those options, I choose pushing your degenerate parasitic ass out of a helicopter before you subject my four year old to a drag queen singing about “her” jazz hands in a public library.

Sure, that makes me a right-wing Nazi.  But you know what?  I don’t have to prove anything to my enemies.  They have to prove to me that they want to preserve our nation and our civilization.

And they’re doing a piss poor job of it.

California Comrades In Your Bedroom

Fresh off the tide of passing affirmative consent, comrades of California have decided to extend sex legislation with two interesting laws, both of which gets more government in the bedroom.

First up, we California has ended the statute of limitations on rape, largely inspired by the allegations made against an old, rich, blind, black comedian.  While this law is debatable, the main reason why there was such limitations in the first place is largely because rape as a crime is very hard to prosecute.

Think about it.  In an age of the hookup culture, where women are encouraged to sleep around until their most fertile and beauftiful years are over, it is nearly impossible to prove a rape occurred without video evidence.  It all comes down to a “he said, she said” scenario and often times, the poor, poor princess is believed over the openly heterosexual male.

Rape as a crime is something that was easy to prosecute back in the day when women were more likely to save their virginity for marriage.  And, like every other crime, it required viable evidence and the right of the accused to confront the accuser.

To me, this sets a dangerous precedent.  I mean, now that rape is pretty much defined as all heterosexual contact, including eye contact, by nearly every woman who hold some kind of sway in government, that means that a man will probably be charged with rape for looking at a woman wrong three decades ago.

I wish that was all an exaggeration.

In another story of sex and comrades in California, being an underage prostitute has been decriminalized.

Basically, the law was passed in order to allow law enforcement to better crackdown on the growing sex trade in California; a trade which could have been marginalized had women not been fucking the top 20% and leaving the rest of the men to go batshit crazy and murder their roommates and sorority neighbors.

The idea behind this law is that women will be able to cooperate with police if they are less likely to be charged with a crime.

So it all sounds like a good idea, right?  The trouble is, why are cops charging victims with crimes when they are supposedly being coerced into them?

But that belies a larger problem: the fact that pimps in California are not going to use more underage girls to walk the streets because they are less likely to face serious criminal charges.  So expect to see a rise in underage girls doing tricks for cash, especially with strict child labor laws in place.

So let’s recap, shall we?

California lifted the statute of limitations on rape so now if you don’t get affirmative consent from your fling, you could be prosecuted for it years down the road, except if the girl was underage and you paid her.

Yeah, heterosexual sex in California is soon to be outlawed.

Some Truths About Feminism

Here are some of the unvarnished truths about feminism and feminists:

• The modern feminist movement was created in order to encourage corporate materialism and promote cultural Marxism.
• The accomplishments of feminists largely have to do with what important man they’re sleeping with.
• The greatest accomplishment of feminism is getting women full access to medical services where legal baby murder is committed.
• Feminism’s chief goal is not about granting more rights for women nor is it about making women happier, but making other women miserable and taking as much as they can from men.
• Feminism hates the institution of marriage because it was a sacred rite before God.
• Feminists are driven by reason or logic but by emotions.
• Feminists are generally not all that attractive because attractive women are always at the top of the social structure.
• Feminism is the politicization of envy.
• Feminism was never about equality, but revenge.
• Feminism denies the realities of biological science.
• Feminism is anti-child and thus anti-civilization.
• Feminism promotes the sexualization of children, especially young girls.
• Feminism is supported by the mentally ill or sexually abused.
• Feminism will not get a man laid.
• Feminists do not make for good wife material, church-goers, life partners, or customers.
• Feminists want access to all “male institutions” not because of equality but because of envy.
• When a feminist calls a man a “rapist”, what they mean is that either he is openly opposed to their agenda or he is not sexually desirable to them.
• Feminists encourage other women to ride the cock carousel because they are dead inside.
• Feminists cannot article why the patriarchy was bad for women, other than vague accusations of abuse and rape.
• Feminists worship their own victimization at the hands of a predator.
• Feminists overlook the crimes of their fellow Narrative adherents because the Narrative is the most important thing.
• Feminists dare not call any non-white person a rapist because they view them as barbarians and are afraid of getting an axe to the face.
• Feminists don’t need a man except for alimony, child support, protections, dirty jobs, tax dollars, children, etc.

There are more, I’m sure of that.

White Guilt Brings Measles Back

More reasons to shut down immigration in the US:

The first reported case of a person with measles in the recent Memphis outbreak, which now numbers seven confirmed cases, was at a local mosque on April 15, according to the Shelby County Health Department.

“The first public place where there was a public exposure potentially [to measles] was theMasjid Al-Noor Mosque on April 15,” Dr. Alisa Haushalter, Director of the Shelby County Health Department, tells Breitbart News.

“The mosque is one location we know that individuals who were infectious were during their infectious period, but that’s not necessarily where the first case occurred. I don’t want you to draw conclusions without sufficient information,” she added.

Haushalter acknowledged, however, that the measles outbreak could have originated with an unvaccinated for measles adult or child brought to Tennessee under the federal refugee resettlement program, something she called “a possibility amongst many.”

So let’s get some things out of the way:

1. Even if you have the measles vaccine, you can still contract measles.  This has happened in the past, very recently in fact, so saying that you are vaccinated against it doesn’t mean total immunity.
2. This kind of thing endangers children because many babies don’t get the vaccines until a certain amount of time passes.  So, any child being placed in a daycare center could end up getting this disease from unvaccinated third-world caretakers.
3. I do vaccinate my children against measles because the disease can cause blindness and it is untreatable, for the most part.

White guilt is literally bringing measles back into vogue.  We in the West didn’t use dead fetus tissue to create the vaccine for no reason after all.

It is high time we brought common sense, reason, and rational thinking back into our immigration policy and stopped arguing for more migrants in order to prove we aren’t racist to assholes who hate us.

I’ll let that last part sink in.

It Figures

Of course, none dare call a Syrian refugee a terrorist:

In the latest of a series of raids, German police have searched two homes in a rural village after a television channel interviewed a suspected Islamic State commander living there as a refugee.

Sankt Johann is a small village in the south west German state, Rhineland-Palatinate. Something of a rural idyll, its 800 residents live between vineyards in the shadow of a 14th century Gothic church. And yet, as SPIEGEL TV reports, this weekend it was the scene of police raids on two Islamic State-linked suspects living in refugee housing.

Prosecutors’ office spokesman Michael Neuhaus said the two men targeted by the operation are “suspected of taking part in the Syrian civil war as members of a foreign terrorist organization”. He said there were “no immediate indications that a concrete attack was planned” but declined to give any further details.

Because it would be racist to do so.

Seriously, you cannot make this shit up.  We have terrorists coming in through the refugee program and you can bet they aren’t planning to live a peaceful, productive life in Germany.

But for some crazy reason that is inexplicable to most native Germans (and other native Europeans), the elites have decided to allow known rapists, murderers, and other assorted criminals into their countries.  Of course the political classes don’t give a damn about this, though, because all those refugees are not place anywhere near their prestigious neighborhoods.

Also, notice how it was a news crew that found the terrorist in question.  In other words, the police aren’t even bothering to do basic legwork when it comes to these refugees.

This is not going to end well.  I predict one side or another will be shuffling their opponents into concentration camps by the next decade.

What Two Party System

It never ceases to amaze me how stupid the Republicans actually are:

Harry Reid just gave Paul Ryan an unwelcome endorsement for speaker.

The Democratic leader offered his surprise backing for Ryan (R-Wis.) to assume the House speakership, saying he hopes Ryan runs and wins the job because he's a "Paul Ryan fan."

It’s weird.  It’s like the Democrats are taunting the Tea Party and everyone else who might potentially vote Republican by stating that they run the damn government.

And why not?  I mean, from top to bottom, the Federal government is nothing but communist Trekkies.  They literally believe that they can fix humanity through the power of monopolized violence courtesy of your local LEO.

And still, the Republicans pretend to get along and always seek compromise with assholes who very clearly do not have any regard for human life, lie nearly all the time, and have no problems with sexual deviancy.  Unless said deviancy is committed by Republicans.  Then it’s bad.

But I digress.  It is clear that we do not have a two party system but a bifactional ruling party.  Harry Reid endorsed Paul Ryan because he knows that he can make deals in his favor with Rep. Ryan.

Yes, this may just be a bluff, but I doubt it.  Senator Reid has probably taken too many blows to the head to come up with anything remotely resembling a clever plan.  The man is so out of touch that he even proposed making prostitution illegal in his home state of Nevada on the floor of the state legislatures.  Nobody applauded.

So I’m going to take this endorsement seriously, knowing that Reid is doing this because he and Ryan agree more than they disagree.

Or they just simply share the same lobbyist friends and therefore get the same cut of the bribery pie.

The Beatings Will Continue

The only reason this was a crime was a because it wasn’t the mental institution staff who was doing the beatings:

A young Palestinian man died on Tuesday after being badly beaten in an "exorcism", medical and police sources in the West Bank town of Hebron said.

The family of the 19-year-old with psychological problems had called in two "healers", a man and a woman, who beat the young man to drive out evil "spirits", Palestinian police sources said.

He was critically injured and taken to hospital in Hebron where he died, police and medics said.

The pair who administered the beating were arrested, as were the victim's father and brother.

In America, we used to cut out your brain and/or run electricity through your brain.  But since that was State-sanctioned violence against people who have no observable physical issues, it was okay.

Cultural Marxist Hate Washington DC

And here we have the insanity of the Cultural Marxist on full display:

District of Columbia residents and tourists weighed in on the controversy surrounding the Confederate flag, some saying the nation should go as far as renaming Washington, D.C.

CNN anchor Don Lemon recently floated the idea of re-thinking the Jefferson Memorial, dedicated to Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States, since he was a slave owner.

“There may come a day when we want to re-think Jefferson, I don’t know if we should do that, but when we get to that point, I’ll be happy to partake in that particular discussion,” Lemon said.

“It should come down,” one D.C. resident told PJ Media, referencing the Jefferson Memorial in Washington.

“If we do that, though, George Washington owned slaves. Should we rename Washington, D.C.?” he was asked.

“You have to draw the line at some point, I guess, maybe take a poll across the country and see what people think about it and if they want to rename the city, do it,” he said. “I would support changing the American flag as well. America is based on a lot of mass killings and slavery and the history is just – look at the Germans, they own up to the Holocaust, nobody is proud of their history. Americans, at least, you should not be proud of any mass killing. You should not be proud of anything wrong that’s been done in the past or any symbols that represent that and that’s all.”

Another man suggested renaming Washington “Black City” or “Mixed City.”

This is what communists do.  They re-write their country’s history in their own image and try and pass themselves off as noble and good.

Sorry, but you cannot confront history by erasing it.  And nobody alive today has ever even known a slave.  At least not an official one.  I’d argue that welfare, the draft, and student loans are simply slavery, but since the government does, it’s okay, right?

The point is, these people are insane.  They need to be ignored, not embraced.  This country isn’t perfect, it doesn’t have a perfect history, but it has a proud history.  It has a history of men who stood up to much, much lesser tyrannies than this and died for it.  They built a new nation based on the assumption that most people are not idiots (a fallacy at best).

It time to try something different, to try and make a country truly ruled by the consent of the governed rather than a populace appeased by the bread and circuses of the tyrant.  Sure, it hasn’t worked out as well as one might hope, but the point is you don’t destroy history because you don’t like it.

And isn’t naming Washington D.C. “Black City” a racist term in and of itself?

Jenner and Science Denial

So “Caitlyn” Bruce Jenner was making big headlines earlier this week.  I don’t know much about him other than he was an athlete who decided to get “sex change” surgery and “become” a woman.

So much for science.

I’ve stated this before but it bears repeating: there is nothing you can do if you are born male or born female to change your gender.

Yes, you can take hormones.  Yes, you can mutilate your own body and sculpt to look more like the opposite sex.

But deep down in the depths of your genetic makeup is this pesky XX or XY chromosome that determines your gender.

Yes, I am aware that sometimes people don’t have this chromosome clearly defined.  But Mr. Jenner is not one of them.

Gender is not a social construct.  The social constructs are what we do with women and men as a society, not the actual gender itself.  There is a huge difference there and it needs to be understood that the people pushing Jenner’s “transformation” are confused about this point (or downright wicked demoniacs).

As for me, I prefer to define gender based on genetic science and not based on what an individual “feels” like defining it.

To do so otherwise means that science is subjective, uncertain, and fallacious at best.  While there is a lot about genetic science that we still don’t know, we know enough to be certain that there are key genetic markers that determine gender.

Everyone pushing this idea of gender fluidity is merely a science-denier, pure and simple.

Lately, I have seen a rapid push for so-called transgendered individuals to be accepted much like the homosexuals have been.  I’m not sure what the overall agenda is, but the marching orders don’t appear to be coming from the side of righteousness.

I’m not sure, but I suspect that the inner circle, as depicted by C.S. Lewis in That Hideous Strength, is a very real thing and that they are governed by a powerful demonic force.

People are sinners, yes, but this level of wickedness surpasses your run of the mill porn viewing or condiment theft.  There is something dark and malevolent out there and it appears to have taken hold of mainstream entertainment and many significant world leaders.

Jenner appears to be merely the latest iteration of their plan.  And yes, there appears to be a plan of some kind that doesn’t end well for many of us, should it be fully implemented.

On the Responses to ‘Rape’ on ‘Game of Thrones’

Apparently Game of Thrones has crossed the line.  A popular female character was “raped” on screen by an ugly male character with a eunuch watching.  I put the word “raped” in quotes because number 1) it was a staged scene in a television show and 2) technically the characters were already married so it isn’t rape as consent was given via marital vows.

The outrage is so extreme that even Senator Claire McCaskill has said she’s done with the show.  I don’t know what is more stupid, the fact that she’s obviously lying or the fact that a U.S. Senator actually watches the show.

In a show where a woman was sold as a sex slave to a savage, where good men and women are brutally murdered, where a child was pushed out of a window to cover up incest, and where a fetal child was stabbed to death over an insult, this is what crosses the line for feminists.

And the great part in all this is that George R. R. Martin is not a stranger to feminism.  He embraces it and has openly sought to condemn this year’s effort by outsiders to infiltrate the Hugo awards in order to reverse the tidal wave of stupid fiction written by preachy whiners (aka Social Justice Warriors).

So what have we learned about feminism in all this?

For one thing, they are not happy people.  No matter how much you claim to be on their side and no matter what you do to curry favor with them, they will stab you in the front and go for the genitals.  They cannot be appeased and they will not compromise.  They are not interested in cutting deals, they are interested in cutting dicks.

Another thing is that their outrage is selective.  I don’t know much about the show or the books, but I suspect that the “rape” victim was a feminist hero of some kind and the “rapist” was a typical male psychopath.  What this demonstrates is that they are only concerned with their own kind and don’t give a flying rat’s butt about anyone else outside of their own clique.

In other words, feminists are tribal.  And in this post-post-modern world, your tribe is strongly tied into your ideology.  Going slightly off the reservation means you are exiled, as Mr. Martin (and Mr. Wheedon) are just now hopefully realizing.

The bottom line here is that feminism is not a ideology you want to get yourself tangled up in.  Eventually, all feminists do is end up feasting on their own.  Looking as you Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

More Reasons to Homeschool

This was an interesting study that reinforced my desire to homeschool my children:

U.S. teens are getting sleepier: Many lack even seven hours of shut-eye each night and the problem has worsened over two decades, a study found.

More than half of kids aged 15 and older would need to sleep at least two hours more each night to meet recommendations for adequate rest, heightening concerns about the impact on their health and academic performance. That’s according to researchers who analyzed the University of Michigan’s annual “Monitoring the Future” national surveys of youth behavior.

I don’t know the exact schedule these kids have, but I think we as a society need to reconsider what we’re doing to our teenagers.

Right now, I wake up at around 6 every weekday morning to go to the gym (weather or health permitting).  At around 6:30 AM, I see high school kids waiting for their bus to go to school.

Think about that.  These kids have to be at the bus stop by 6:30 in the morning in order to go to high school.  That means that in order to get a shower, get breakfast, and to be ready for the day, they have wake up between 5 and 5:30 AM in order to get out to school.

It is absolutely insane that we burden children with classes that probably start at around 7:30 AM in the morning.  School teachers pile on homework on them, which can take anywhere from 1 hour to 3 hours a day, encourage them to do extracurricular activities, which is generally 1 to 2 hours a day, and we expect them to be in bed by 9 or 10 PM?

This is assuming, of course, that they will be eating dinner and have time for their own leisurely activities.  The entire school system these days expects teens to be constantly part of school except on holidays and weekends, but even weekends can be eaten up by school activities.

And we are stunned when we find out that teens aren’t getting enough sleep?  We chalk it up to bad parenting?  How about bad schooling, schooling which most of you idiots voted for?

Homeschool your kids so they can get a good night’s sleep.  Because school boards aren’t going to change these policies, no matter what you do at this point.  The system must be preserved at all costs, especially the children.

Stupid Watchdog Group

Now that the movie Fifty Shades of Grey is just around the corner, it is back in the news again.  Honestly, I couldn’t care less about it save for the media circus that is following it around.  This is a movie based on a book written by a woman.  It is the BSDM version of Twilight save the supernatural creatures.

Now some watchdog group (and it is just really easy to become one these days) called “Morality in Media” is complaining about the movie.  Their basic complaint is that the movie’s rating is to soft.  Here’s a brief overview of it:

“What the term ‘unusual’ does not account for is the coercion, sexual violence, female inequality, and BDSM themes from which the entire Fifty Shades plot is based,” the statement reads. “Such a vague evaluation puts viewers at risk, sending the message that humiliation is pleasurable and that torture should be sexually gratifying.”

So let’s read off the complaints.

First we have “coercion” in a movie.  Or rather, coercion of a female by a male into risky sex.  The underlying complaint here is that the main character is “raped” by the male who seeks her out.  She is unable to reject his sexual advances, despite even signing a non-disclosure agreement in order to engage in a sexual relationship with Mr. Grey.  So I guess the message is that women lack responsibility for their actions and moral agency.

Second we have “sexual violence” in the movie.  I know that BSDM is violent and it is definitely an extreme form of sexuality, but at the same time it is not rape or sexual assault.  The attempt by Morality in Media here is to say that BSDM is a form or rape.

Third we have “female inequality”.  At this point I am wondering why depictions of submissive women should be considered having a higher rating than ‘R’, but that’s just me.

And finally we have “BSDM themes”.  Never mind that there have been plenty of R-rated movies out there that depicted “BSDM themes” and never a peep from an organization that has been around since 1962.

Let’s compare all of that with the movie Gone Girl where a woman rapes a man after slitting his throat.  He is literally being raped while at the same time dying and seeing his murderer enjoy herself.  That sounds like sexual violence, coercion, female inequality (the other way), and BSDM themes to me.  But not a fucking peep from these hypocrites.

I don’t care for this movie really in that I am not interested in watching it.  If I wanted to watch a BSDM scene, it is a simple matter of looking up pornography online.  I don’t need a sappy romance drama to provide me with BSDM themed sexual encounters.

The best thing this non-profit could have done is kept their damn mouths shut.  The movie would come and go and nobody would have cared except a bunch of chicks in their low-20s who grew up on Twilight.  But I guess that isn’t their job.

Politician Expresses Shock That Politicians Lie

In which a naïve Congressman expresses his shock that other politicians lie:

Once in the limelight, Stutzman reacted by sending mixed messages and then falling as silent as the Republican leaders. He elevated the controversy Thursday night, when he claimed that his support for the rule was obtained under false pretenses.

“Earlier today, I supported the rule because I was informed by leadership that the cromnibus was dead and a short-term CR would take its place,” Stutzman said in a Thursday-evening statement after National Review Online reported on the apparent deal. “I was very surprised and even more disappointed to see the cromnibus back on the floor.”

So let me get this straight: politicians are renown for being serial liars.  No matter what party they are a part of, most people generally agree that politicians lie.

And now we’re suppose to believe that this junior Congressman was lied to?

Here’s what probably really happened:

• Stutzman knew what was going to happen and is now trying to cover his ass.
• Stutzman is covering his ass.
• Stutzman is really as stupid as he is passing himself off to be.

This is exactly why I cannot enter politics.  Besides the immoral things I would have to do, I would have to deal with scoundrels on a regular basis.  And while it might be a lot of fun to outmaneuver such men and women, it would also be exhausting for me and would not work in the long term.

If what Stutzman claims is true, though, then it is more proof that the Republican leadership is nothing more than controlled opposition for the communist Democratic party.

Female Scientist Blames Porn For Bad Dating Culture

So I read through this article last week, which highlights the Female Imperative beautifully:

Men who regularly watch pornography are more likely to depend on it to stay aroused but are less likely to enjoy sex with a real-life partner, a new study says.

The “media scripts” that men absorb when they view pornography can play a role in their sexual activities, said Arkansas psychologist Ana Bridges and other academics in New York and Virginia.

After studying 487 male college students, the researchers found that the more men used pornography, the more likely they were to try to act out the same scenes and rely on pornography-inspired fantasies to engage in sex.

I am not going to dispute the softcore science in this article because I don’t think the “science” was properly reported.  At best, I can only say that they had too small a sample and focused on a single group of men.

But I’m not a social softcore scientist.

Now, I’m not going to say that pornography is good and there is nothing wrong with it.  There is plenty of things that are wrong with it.  I consider my own past usage of pornography (mostly Lesbian porn) to be a vice that I need to overcome.  I make no excuses for it nor do I consider such behavior normal.

So, yes, I consider pornography to be damaging for men in how they relate to women.

But that is not the point of this article.  The point is to shame men.  Here’s why:

• At no point were the effects of pornography on women ever even considered.  Women use pornography almost as much as men these days and I am certain that it damages their own relational attitudes toward men.
• A woman’s primary vice is envy.  With that in mind, I consider the study, which was run by a female softcore scientist, to be based in envy.
• The reasons for studying the effects of pornography on men is because women don’t like competition.  Within Western society, more and more men are finding themselves unable to relate to women because they are wasting their younger, attractive years on ALPHA (non-committed) men and leaving the stable BETAs for when they are about to hit the wall.  So more and more men are turning to porn because they are tired of dealing with women who are more interested in higher grade men for a quick fuck (I know, it’s crude, but it is reality).

I don’t like men turning to pornography either.  But just as a wife who withholds sex from her husband bears some responsibility for his porn viewing (note the some part of the sentence), women bear some responsibility for the rampant porn usage by men.

I am not asking for women to become pornstars with their partners and spouses.  I am not justifying men who demand that their ladies become their own private pornstars (although there is nothing wrong with asking for something more than missionary).  I am merely pointing out that the reality of dating only benefits 20% of all men, many of whom are only interested in a notch in their belt.  It also spoils women for their future husbands as the median number of past sexual partners for women before marriage is ~4, which increases the likelihood of divorce.

America is supposedly a Christian nation.  I know, many churches consider all other churches to be not true Christians, but you have to accept that 82% of Americans consider themselves to be a Christian.  With that in mind, we have to look at Biblical marriage, which is an institution for pursuing romantic love, not a social contract for monogamous dating.

But that won’t change any time soon.  We can blame pornography for men’s indifference to female attention all we want, but the fact is that dating has become the ALPHA’s game and most men are left with their dicks in their hands.

Police Can Murder and Get Praise

Read this and keep in mind that Peter King was in charge of the anti-terrorism committee in Congress:

While many lawmakers have been denouncing the Staten Island grand jury decision not to indict white police officer Daniel Pantaleo in the July chokehold death of an unarmed black man, Eric Garner, Rep. Peter King, R-New York, has been taking a different approach.

On Wednesday, King tweeted his gratitude to the jury for "doing justice" in their handling of the case.

"Thanks to SI grand jury for doing justice & not yielding to outside pressure," King tweeted. "Decision must be respected. Compassion for the Garner family. "

Later, he told Wolf Blitzer on CNN's "The Situation Room" that he feels "strongly" the police officer should not have been indicted, arguing that there is no way he could have known that Garner's health conditions would affect his ability to survive the chokehold.

"The police had no reason to know he was in serious condition," King said. "You had a 350-pound person who was resisting arrest. The police were trying to bring him down as quickly as possible. If he had not had asthma and a heart condition and was so obese, almost definitely he would not have died."

Peter King, by the way, is an Irish terrorist.  But here, he is acting as a police apologist.

The fact remains that the police officer used an illegal choke hold to subdue a man because he was fleeing from them.  His crime?

Untaxed cigarettes.

Yes, the police chased after a man because he was selling a tobacco product on the black market.  Not drugs.  Not explosives.  Not even guns.

Just a legal product that happens to be heavily taxed in New York City.

And here we have a Congressman supporting the police (big surprise) and applauding the fact that the police officer used an illegal technique to restrain a suspect.

The Bible says what the police officer did was murder.  But the government says that it isn’t murder if the police are involved.

And so does Congress.  At least they are consistent.

Well, It Isn’t Called Yahoo News For No Reason

Take about missing the point:

Riyadh (AFP) - Saudi Arabia executed on Wednesday a man who donned women's clothing in a bid to escape after shooting dead a soldier and police officer, state media said.

Salih bin Yateem bin Salih al-Qarni was beheaded in the southwestern city of Abha, the official Saudi Press Agency said.

Qarni was intially arrested on other charges and was transported in an official vehicle by the soldier and a member of the Muttawa religious police.

"He shot them with a gun that he was carrying," the SPA said, without explaining how he obtained the weapon.

After stealing the keys from the security officer driving the vehicle, Qarni chewed some narcotic qat "and disguised himself in women's clothing" in an attempt to flee, but was recaptured, it said.

Saudi women are required to cover from head to toe, often with only their eyes exposed.

The report did not say when the escape bid occurred.

Qarni is the latest of 69 Saudis and foreigners executed in the kingdom this year, despite international concern.

Rape, murder, apostasy, drug trafficking and armed robbery are all punishable by death under the kingdom's strict version of Islamic sharia law.

So a couple of observations:

1. This guy murdered two people in cold blood.  I’m pretty sure his execution has nothing to do with wearing women’s clothing.
2. Despite their strict laws, it sounds like the Saudis, unlike the US, actually has a speedy trial process.
3. If Saudi women did not want to wear coverings, they will give it up.  As it stands, these women choose to wear these coverings.  Yes, they are beaten if they do not wear them, but if enough women got together and stopped wearing these garbs, there wouldn’t be enough men to enforce the law.
4. Besides apostasy, pretty much everyone in the West agrees that rape, murder, drug trafficking, and armed robbery are crimes.  The Western justice system seems to sympathize with the criminals though, rather than the victims.

Yahoo news lives up to its namesake.

Consensual Contracts For Dummies

California recently passed a law that requires some kind of written or recorded consent for college students to engage in sexual relations.  While the law is probably gender neutral as well as sexual preference neutral, it is a law designed to target heterosexual white men.  They are devils, if you believe what Leftists believe.  Except for the white, heterosexual, cisgender men who share Leftist ideals.

And really, are they men or just human beings who happen to be male?

This new law is just one more step toward government-directed reproduction with the feminists and other assorted assholes at the helm.  In other words, it is an incremental step toward eugenics and population control (emphasis on the control part).

The biggest problem with implementing the Eugenics agenda is primarily the male sex drive.  Without the male sex drive, our species would have died off centuries ago or there would be less than one million people on the planet.  You see, when a woman submits to her husbands sexual advances whenever he asks, she tends to have more children.  Enough children to grow civilization actually.

So by limiting the male sex drive, the world elite can abandon their responsibilities of leadership and instead live a life of luxury with their boot on the throats of the few who remain.  A large population is hard to control, after all.

More than that, this law was passed with the idea to curb rape.  But the premise is bad because it presumes that all rapes are committed against white, heterosexual, cisgender women by white, heterosexual, cisgender men.  The truth is, the feminist definition of rape (which expanded until it included 25% of all men) occurs equally among the sexes (I won’t go down the race route right now as it is irrelevant here).  Women are just as likely to rape men as men are to rape women.

There are plenty of stories of men who are sexually assaulted and humiliated by women.  In many cases, these are committed by women who don’t give a damn that a man did not give his consent and instead taunt him about his lack of manliness.  If a man demanded sex from a woman and called her a prude in the process while she refused consent, feminists would call that rape.

Of course, feminism isn’t about equality of the sexes.  It never was.

I suspect that this law will backfire.  What is more than likely going to happen is that women will become more and more selective in who they fuck.  There will be an elite few Alpha males who will enjoy the benefits of pussy while several men will be left to their own devices.  These men will either start reading up on the manosphere, look at a lot of porn, build sex robots, or, in rare cases, buy some guns and shoot up a sorority.

This is because women tend to pine for men who are way above their own attractiveness.  They can’t help it really.  They want the Alpha male whose good-looking, charming, and a natural bad boy.  They gush over that kind of thing.

What will probably happen is that many of these women will have pre-printed forms ready to be signed and will hand them out to men they wish to be fucked by.  It will probably list parameters too as to what can and can’t be done (oral, anal, vaginal, etc.).  It may even have checkboxes for such things.

Unfortunately for men, even this contract will ultimately not protect them from the perpetual victimhood culture of feminists.  What will happen, as with every relationship contract, is that the courts of both campus rape squads and the actual criminal courts will throw those consent contracts out.

How do I know this?  Well, a similar contract is established in all 50 states already: the marriage license.  And this contract can be tossed whenever either spouse feels like it (usually the wife when she’s not happy).  And given the State’s own track record with handling marriage, I doubt their handling of random flings will be much better.

Ebola for Everyone

Now we’ve come to find out that a nurse who was treating the Ebola man in Dallas has come down with the disease herself, along with her boyfriend.  All this in spite of the fact that she was wearing hazmat protection.

So now we need to panic, right?

Perhaps.

On the other hand, there were 70 people treating this man at the time and only one person got infected among them (so far).  If Ebola had mutated, then there would be a few dozen infected already.  Well, that may not be true considering the incubation period can last up to three weeks.

Still though, the evidence so far indicates that the nurse mishandled her protective gear, or someone else’s.  That is unfortunate.

I’ve heard Chris Brown say that Ebola is a form of population control.  While I do believe that the global elites (such as British royalty, multinational business owners, and Western politicians in top positions of power) do desire a sizable reduction in humanity, they would come up with something more effective than Ebola.  Like forced birth control and sterilization.

I will say too that the US government response has been baffling to say the least.  Somehow denying visas to people in the afflicted countries would spread the disease more?  Yet it is also illegal to import most foreign animals into the US, right?

As of right now, the most likely scenario is that the Ebola virus will be a distant memory by this time next year and any mention of it will be the Republicans’ fault.  Or Bush’s fault.  Whichever scapegoat will be need by this Presidential administration.

By the way, did anyone catch the latest episode of The Walking Dead?  I thought they were going to be playing up the drama in Terminus for three episodes.  Glad they took care of it sooner.