Thursday, August 28, 2014

Churchian Chastity is Idolatry

The Churchian model of marriage is seriously flawed.  Too often is chastity put up on a pedestal in place of God Himself.  In other words, the Churchian model of chastity is nothing more that idolatry brought on by pride.  If you need an example, read this article.

I won’t quote it here, because there is too much to read and I don’t feel like quoting an entire article here.  The bottom line is that this young woman took a pledge to maintain her virginity until marriage.  Such pledges are very common in the Churchian world.  It is wrong to do so, not but not for reasons that most people think.  More on that in a minute.

The young woman then got married and lost her virginity, as many women are supposed to do on their wedding night.  Now in the wake of it, she feels violated, like she has lost something.  She feels dirty and unworthy of God’s love because she had sex.

This is a damaging and sick view of her sexuality.  Suddenly, she feels bad because she’s no longer popular or special (in her own eyes).  This is the same problem I have with many homosexuals, in that they put their entire identity as a person into their sexuality.

Now she’s not religious anymore.  In other words, she was sold a lie, that her virginity made her pure, and when she lost it, in the correct way, she is no longer pure.

This is the definition of pride.  Worst still, it shows how the modern Church has failed to properly address sex and sexuality within our own culture.  We don’t have a marriage culture, we have a dating culture.

Can you imagine if the men and women of 200 years ago came to our modern culture and found out that engagements last for months after a year or two of dating?  Then when we do get married, we are supposed to go on regular dates, as some kind of constant courtship fantasy to “fulfill” women when it really doesn’t.

The problem with the modern Church is that it places too much emphasis on pre-martial sex and husbands loving their wives, the latter of which involves proving yourself worthy of your wife, even though she is Biblically required to respect her husband regardless of what he does.

Right now, the church encourages teenagers to remain virgins.  This is not a bad thing really.  Telling teenagers to have sex with everyone they date is also wrong.  However, the Church also encourages teenagers to date with no intentions of marrying.

This is the equivalent of putting a mug a beer before an alcoholic and waving your finger in his face telling him that he can’t drink that.  We should not invite them into temptation in that way.

The truth is, Biblical marriage occurs once a man’s penis penetrates a woman’s vagina.  In other words, true marriage is the act of sex.  This is made very clear in the Old Testament and in the New Testament as well.  The religious ceremony is nothing more than a public acknowledge that this couple has decided to bang each other until one dies.

With that definition in mind, then it becomes clear that there is no such thing as “pre-marital” sex.  There is only fornication, which is the act of having sex with no intention of remaining with your partner or not remaining faithful to your partner afterwards.  The modern definition of fornication is skewed.  An engaged couple is perfectly fine to have sex before the wedding ceremony because they intend to stay together.

Marriage is the outlet for our burning passions.  For the Christian, it is the outlet to express romantic love.  Dating is a modern concept which I hope will be gotten rid of in time.  Before the modern world, parents would often chose a wife for their son or a husband for their daughter once they were at an age where they could handle it.  And guess what?  Those marriages worked out.

Maybe letting immature people pick who they are going to spend the rest of their lives with isn’t exactly a good plan overall for society.  Perhaps we need to go back to a model that may seem archaic but also was entirely stable.  Unfortunately, that won’t happen as modern man and woman seem content to either fornicate until they get it right or contain themselves they burn out.

Either way is not a Biblical model.  It needs to be properly addressed in the modern Church.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

The War on Husbands, Part II

The War on Husbands is taking a new low in the UK:

Husbands who keep their wives downtrodden could face prison under new plans set out by the Government today.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, published proposals for a new offence of “domestic abuse” that would criminalise men or women who bully, cause psychological harm or deny money to their partners.

The law would make the worst cases of non-violent “controlling behaviour” a jailable offence.

Exact terms of the offence are yet to be defined, but it could involve humiliating, frightening or intimidating a partner, keeping them away from friends or family or restricting their access to money.

As I have said before, the State, no matter what country or culture it is in, hates true husbands because they represent competition.  A true husband leads his family.

And this is an affront to most people in power, especially if they are women.  Women in power tend to create and pass laws that target husbands out of envy because they don’t like other women being lead by anyone but themselves.

Here’s the thing: does this law even bother to account for women who are seriously mentally ill?  A husband may be restricting her access to money because he doesn’t want her to spend all of his hard-earned money on garbage they don’t need.

As a resident of the United States, I am glad that so far nobody has created a law this insane.  But I know that it will be coming my way.  Hell, we have already outlawed “cyber rape” which is really just a slutty woman unhappy about how her ex-boyfriend used of her nude pictures.

Husbands are under attack and until the majority of them realize it, instead of watching their favorite NFL teams wear pink, we are going to more and more anti-civilization legislation such as this get passed.

I have agreed with Vox Day’s assertion that women ruin everything.  This is becoming more and more observably true with each passing day as more and more women infiltrate every single activity that men do and then criticize them for doing it wrong.

I know not all women are like that.  But at the same time, they don’t stop the crazy ones.  And men can’t do it because you women just think we’re teaming up against “Team Women”.  So either start policing your own properly or get used to wearing a burqua.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

On Human Behavior

Some advice on human behavior:

  • Nothing you do can change other people.  Nothing you say will change their minds.  You cannot fix them and you cannot save them.  This applies to both men and women.  Arguing with them is pointless.
  • No matter how hard you try, people will always look at the smaller problems in lieu of the larger ones.  Inflation started to rise during the 1920s due to the Federal Reserve but the people were more concerned about alcohol prohibition as an example.  And while the small things do matter, don’t overlook the big ones for the small ones.
  • Never trust what someone else says.  Always judge them by their actions.  In fact, the more they are against an immoral act, the more likely they are committing it.
  • Whatever social media you are on, nobody will pay attention to you.  So whatever you say will not matter.  Unless you have family or close friends following you.  Even then they may not care unless you post something extremely controversial.
  • If you have young children, you need to recognize that their personalities are pretty much set, baring some horrific psychological or physical trauma.  So deal with them as they are and not as you want them to be.
  • All successful political movements are backed by strong corporate interests.  Never assume that they are benevolent people who only want what is best.
  • Most people are losers.  And losers want people to agree with them 100% because it somehow validates their pathetic existence.  Always keep that in mind when dealing with them.
  • You are not a winner.  Especially if you have to wonder about it.  Don’t worry, I’m not one either.
  • No matter what you do, there will always be people who misunderstand you, usually intentionally so.  Very few people actually care about who you really are or what you are really about.  This is especially true if you are a woman as most guys are only interested in fucking your face, among other orifices.  Unless they are family of course.
  • Good music is lost on most people.
  • Most people have a different standard.  The standard for themselves and the standard for everyone else.  This is intentional on a subconscious level in order to absolve themselves of their sins and to maximize their own happiness at the expense of everyone else.
  • Most people like to believe themselves to be bigger than they really are.  This ranges from calling yourself an activist to being a leader to being George Washington’s reincarnation.  It is a delusion that keeps most bored people sane.  Don’t try to break that delusion.  At the same time, don’t encourage it either.
  • There is nothing more tyrannical than a small collection of bored people.  Bored people tend to try and fix things that aren’t broken.
  • Men fuck sluts and marry virgins.  Most young women do not understand this simple concept and assume that they’ll get a high-class male as a husband if they act slutty with inferior men.
  • If you come across a person who claims to be an activist, they are probably either incredibly stupid or sociopathic.  Have nothing to do with their causes.
  • Don’t bother discussing politics with other people.  Either they won’t care or they will hate you for your views.
  • People are so judgmental about all the wrong things.

In short, people are self-absorbed, selfish losers who grasp at petty and meaningless things in order to find meaning.  Recognize this and you will be stronger for it.  Take advantage of it and you can be a god among men.

If you are a crazy asshole.

Friday, August 15, 2014

Feminism’s Equality Mask

So we have another major actor saying he is a feminist.  This time it is Joseph Gordon-Levitt.  Now, I like many of the movies he’s in, so I don’t hold that against him anymore than I hold it against Joss Whedon.

But I have a sneaking suspicion that most people who claim to be feminist either don’t understand what feminism is really about or are simply raked with misplaced guilt.  I don’t know what camp these Hollywood types fall into (my guess is stupidity), but I suppose it doesn’t matter.

The truth is, feminism is not about female empowerment, it is about establishing selective female rulers and male proxies by removing the societal responsibilities of womanhood while retaining all the benefits.  I know that is a bit of a wordy description, so I’ll elaborate further.

First of all, think about one of the most fundamental biological functions a woman can perform: having a baby.  Now, in the modern Western society, rightly or wrongly, a woman can give up her baby through various means, either through scrambling its brains while in the womb or just by abandoning it at a specific location or through a specific agency.  In these cases, no state institution compels the mother to be an actual mother.

Contrast that with the situation that men find themselves in.  If a man gets a blowjob from a woman and she preserves his sperm and impregnates herself with it using a turkey baster, then he will be on the hook for child support.  Men do not have a say in matter all.  The State compels him to play the part of a father without the benefits of actually raising said child.

So we see a definite pattern here: a woman has all the perks of motherhood and none of the responsibilities while the man has all the responsibilities of fatherhood but none of the perks.  All the choices are hers and hers alone while the men is left destitute as he gets carted off to jail for not being able to pay child support.  Or he simply immolates himself on the courthouse steps and nobody notices or really cares.  He was a deadbeat dad after all.

Look, I’m not trying to make this about equality or fairness.  I believe in neither because equality is a myth constructed by inferior moral busybodies to rule over us and if life were fair, we’d all get what we truly deserved (here’s a hint: we don’t deserve most of what we have).  This is about what the feminists claim they stand for versus what they actually stand for.  If feminists were about equality, then they wouldn’t support or encourage this nonsense in our court systems; they would fight against it.

The same can be said about alimony and child support in general.  Isn’t it a little degrading for a woman to have a court order to make her ex-husband support her and her child financially?  Shouldn’t she be independent and strong enough to support herself and her children without the financial aid of a man?

But you will never hear a feminist talk like that.  For the true feminist, alimony and child support are vengeance against the patriarchy.  Never mind that any sane and reasonable person would award custody to the parent who better provide for the basic needs of the child (food, clothing, and shelter require money last I checked).  Instead, it is about the emotional needs of the child rather than the physical needs.  Because good feelings are just as good as a full belly.

Feminism is all about suppressing men and taking vengeance against them.  It is about tearing down everything that men built out of envy for the things they cannot do.  Because feminism is the politicization of Envy and Envy is a deadly sin.

Share This