tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-49264434306865837662024-03-13T11:24:47.509-04:00On the Rim of InsanityI must speak, that I may find relief; I must open my lips and answer. I will not show partiality to any man or use flattery toward any person. For I do not know how to flatter, else my Maker would soon take me away.swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.comBlogger1338125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-75313764186851765692024-01-02T20:07:00.001-05:002024-01-02T20:07:12.236-05:00Karenocracy<p> In a very early episode of <i>Family Guy</i>, Stewie Griffin refers to his mother's nurturing as a "gynocracy". It was an amusing term at the time and it perfectly illustrates a worldview that such a character would have.</p><p>But what if we were living under a gynocracy of sorts right now? What if we were, in fact, living under the management of something much worse than that?</p><p>Ladies and gentlemen, I offer you the nightmare scenario of the Karenocracy.</p><p>To define a Karenocracy, we have to have a simple definition of a "Karen". A Karen is simply a woman who is entitled, arrogant, and authoritarian. They are often white, middle-aged women who seem to be suffering from the male equivalent of a mid-life crisis, although in this case it usually focuses more on political action rather than trying to reclaim youthful vigor.</p><p>Karens are not necessarily racist. I have to stress this since a common misconception is that they are, when in reality their actions are more about them and their sense of entitlement and power rather than other people.</p><p>And we are all currently living under the tyranny of the Karens, or a Karenocracy.</p><p>Recently, the Secretary of State in Maine, Shenna Bellows, decided that President Trump should not be on the ballot in Maine because of a bunch of YouTube videos she watched about January 6th, 2021 or something. It really doesn't matter what her reasons were, because they were just excuses to elevate her sense of importance and entitlement.</p><p>It came out shortly afterwards that she participated in a Zoom meeting with several other Secretaries of State, all of whom were middle-aged women, where they discussed ways they could "save democracy." Sadly, Katie Hobbs wasn't on that meeting, probably because she was too busy plotting how she could steal the Arizona governor's race.</p><p>I am willing to bet that in every state, the head of elections is a Karen. Red state, blue state, it doesn't matter. That responsibility has probably been granted, or delegated, to a woman because men would rather pretend to be governor or attorney general and not take a less glamorous position.</p><p>But the Karenocracy extends far beyond the electoral system. They occupy nearly all HR departments in every major company or corporation. And let me tell you, no matter how high up you are in the leadership structure of a corporation, you will have to get HR approval before you are even allowed to fire someone.</p><p>Karens are the primary driving force behind expanding child sacrifice in several states under the guise of "abortion or reproductive rights." They can't stand "losing" a right, even the right to murder their own children because that would be them giving up power. And what is more powerful than control over life and death?</p><p>Karens also permeate our entertainment industries, taking up writing and directing duties for popular movies, They write the "best-selling" books, the comic books, even localize anime and fan wikis. It's like they want to ruin everything that men enjoy and are constantly trying to teach us to think like them.</p><p>This is not a political issue. In both political parties, you will find Karens. In fact, if a woman is a politician, she's probably a Karen. Already we are seeing the likes of Nikki Haley and Marjorie Taylor Greene get exposed for committing repeated adultery. They are also constantly fighting with other members of their own party. And this is just the publicly reported stuff. I'm sure there is a lot going on behind the scenes.</p><p>I fully expect most people to read this and say that I'm misogynistic or that I have had bad experiences with women or that I'm an incel. To be frank, I don't care. Every time there is a shitty judicial ruling, a shitty rule exploited, a shitty decision made to make everyone miserable, it's always a Karen behind it.</p><p>Yes, there is a ruling class of oligarchs in the West who are managing our political leaders. But are employing Karens to mismanage things on their behalf. This is because, at the end of the day, women are more likely to obey men with authority, even if they are a Karen.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-2185576717024428182023-03-16T17:53:00.001-04:002023-03-16T17:53:31.216-04:00The Stock Market Is Not The Free Market<p>A few months ago, there were a ton of YouTubers promoting a new sponsor: Established Titles.  This was a means by which a person could buy a 1 square foot plot of a Scottish noble’s land and then they would allegedly be able to grant themselves the title of Lord or Lady.</p> <p>Also, they would plant trees on it or something.</p> <p>The problem was the entire scheme is basically a sham.  You don’t become a lord or lady simply by owning a parcel of land.  Not in the modern age.</p> <p>This is not to say that owning the plot wasn’t real, just that their claims of becoming a lord or lady were bogus.  Seriously, would the House of Lords in London let you in because you had title to 1 square foot of land?</p> <p>As fraudulent as the scheme was, it pales in comparison to one of the biggest schemes devised by the modern West: the stock market.</p> <p>Established Titles was really just a smaller scale version of the stock market.  Essentially, publicly traded companies have sold partial ownership of their company to whoever can afford it.  In effect, stockholders are considered owners of the company.</p> <p>This is inherently anti-free market.  You see, in order for the free market to function, it requires private property ownership.  When you dilute a company’s ownership in such a way, it’s not longer really anyone’s property.</p> <p>When everyone owns it, nobody does.</p> <p>Setting that reasoning aside, think about the nature of the stock market and what would happen to it if the Federal government stopped regulating it entirely.  I mean, it became a truly free market system without any government interference.</p> <p>More than likely, it would all be exposed as a fraud, much like Established Titles was.  While there are some additional benefits in owning a stock, like dividends or the ability to direct company policy, ultimately it’s a scam.</p> <p>I know there are free-marketeers out there who would argue that this is not the case and that owning stocks does equal property ownership.  But if you own Disney stock, do you have the power to tell Disney to stop making LGBTQ content?  You are an owner, after all.  Your concerns should be valid.</p> <p>But they aren’t.  You are no more the owner in the company you hold stock in than you are a lord or lady by owning an Established Title.</p> <p>It’s really a sham that’s been developed into this behemoth of a parasitic financial system.  And it is backed by the full force and fist of the Federal government.</p> <p>Unfortunately, we are stuck in a situation where investing in the stock market is one of the few options available to us.  I do have a few things tied up in mutual funds myself (not all my eggs are there, but there are some) because it is one of the few long-term investments you can make in this broken monetary system.</p> <p>I would advice most business owners to never go public with your business.  If you can, keep ownership of your company in the hands of a single person, not an entity, not a group, and certainly not stockholders.</p> <p>Because being a true owner means you have total control of your business, for good or ill.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-90579909935890965132023-01-06T18:28:00.001-05:002023-01-06T18:28:57.713-05:00Elections and AI<p>Here’s a fun conversation I had with the ChatGPT bot: <br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1bF52Y0YKK7j7t5CLIM98rGLzQUrV9BnJ"><img title="ElectionsQ1" style="display: inline; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="ElectionsQ1" src="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1reqBr3uGD8SilLWfClwCrU5yOl3iXJxY" width="620" height="520" /></a></p> <p><a href="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1izNPOhZX4JWiPaB7xsaPe8t6n20s80hZ"><img title="ElectionsQ2" style="display: inline; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="ElectionsQ2" src="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1DRKm3hVF-TVR3K9BZAgq9rIs1zm5f4Ig" width="624" height="588" /></a></p> <p><a href="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1yTbyoUL9ZGThLNGivXoVsPtW67Y90gQu"><img title="ElectionsQ3" style="display: inline; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="ElectionsQ3" src="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=104nXJ8r8vexu9Z9bUM4EgXy2XK3FH9Q4" width="628" height="332" /></a></p> <p> </p> <p>Note that this doesn’t prove there was election fraud in 2020 for either party.</p> <p>But it is a huge smoking gun.  Voter turnout doesn’t just go from 55% to 97% due to ballot harvesting.  If an accounting firm was doing an audit, this would be a big red flag.</p> <p>I should also note that the AI chatbot here wasn’t lying to me, it was simply repeating the data it had.  It wasn’t designed to do actual data analysis, which means that our current AI is little better than a young child in terms of data processing.  It can only report data, it cannot analyze and provide context.  It’s still a long ways to go from actual sentience.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-52248546287148954922023-01-02T20:27:00.001-05:002023-01-02T20:27:04.884-05:00Of Cain<p>To understand Cain and why he murdered Abel, we must go back to the original sin of Adam and Eve and the curse that was laid upon the Serpent in the Garden of Eden.  Genesis 3 verse 15 states,</p> <blockquote> <p>I will put enmity between you and the woman, <br />and between your offspring<sup> </sup>and her offspring; <br />he shall bruise your head, <br />and you shall bruise his heel.</p> </blockquote> <p>The key takeaway here is that Eve’s offspring would strike back at the Serpent and the evil that it perpetuated upon all of Mankind.  And, just like the Apostles of Christ who stated that the kingdom of God was at hand shortly after Christ’s ascension.  I imagine that both Adam and Eve believed that Cain would redeem them for Eve states, “I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord” when Cain is born.  Abel is basically an afterthought when his birth is mentioned.  He is the second-born, meant to simply live as a man without the heavy burden placed on Cain.</p> <p>It appears that Cain was elevated and given praise by his parents.  They more than likely believed him to be one to redeem all of mankind, lift the curse of sin, and bring them back into the Garden of Eden.  It is probably why he was tasked with growing produce rather than raising livestock.  Livestock is often considered to be a lower practice by most societies and I am willing to bet that Abel’s chosen profession was one that left him as an outcast among his family.</p> <p>And so Cain and Abel brought their offerings to God.  And God rejected Cain’s offering but accepted Abel’s.  When I was a child, my father said it was because God could see Cain’s heart and while that is probably true, more than likely God was expecting blood sacrifices in order for Cain to redeem his sin.  In a sense, Cain was telling God that he was without sin, unlike his brother Abel, and that he need only give God an offering of produce, not an animal sacrifice.</p> <p>Cain was, naturally, angry with this rejection.  All his life he had been held in high regard and given all the praise that was due to a redeemer of Mankind.  But here was stinky Abel, who offering of animal flesh was accepted over his best produce.</p> <p>And so God, recognizing the danger, commanded Cain to master his own sin, which I imagine only angered Cain even more.  And so, Cain murdered Abel in a perversion of the blood sacrifice that God demanded of Man.</p> <p>Cain was cursed by God for his great sin, of which he was never remorseful over.  At no point does he express regret for his brother’s death.  God curses Cain to be unable to provide for himself anymore, instead having to wander the land begging and scavenging for scraps.  Eventually, he builds a city, probably leveraging his status as Adam’s firstborn in order to establish a kingdom.  And thus, we see the first instance of the elite, born in human sacrifice and cursed to never be able to provide for himself.</p> <p>The most striking element of the story is when God commands Cain to master his own sin.  This is echoed by Jesus when he tells the people to strive to be perfect as the lord God is perfect.  This runs contrary to a lot of modern Christian thought where the general consensus is that we cannot overcome sin on our own, but only through the saving Grace of Jesus.  And while that is certainly true, it does not absolve us of self-control.  We are saved by Grace but we are to conduct our lives in a manner that strives to be perfect like God.</p> <p>So let go of your Pride, your Envy, and master your sin.  Otherwise you may find yourself murdering your brother.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-65828695162737863172022-12-06T19:59:00.002-05:002022-12-07T10:19:48.775-05:00America the Cursed NationLately, it seems to me that the United States has become a curse before God.<div><br /></div><div>I know, this sounds like something some random preacher would say to his congregation in an attempt to keep them around by assuring them that they are not like all the others.</div><div><br /></div><div>But I don't have a congregation and I wouldn't kiss their collective asses if I did. That's probably also why I don't have a congregation.</div><div><br /></div><div>The fact is, Americans have turned their backs on God. As a collective group, we have rejected His messages, His teachings, and His Grace in favor of our own devices and designs.</div><div><br /></div><div>This sounds cliche, but we are all suffering from a very deep spiritual sickness right now as a result of this. And the effects aren't just limited to spirituality. The past several elections where we are seeing massive voter fraud is one such effect. God has turned His back on us and thus allowed evil, wicked, and quite possibly demonically possessed yahoos to rule over us.</div><div><br /></div><div>In this past election alone, we saw red states like Montana and Kentucky vote via referendum to keep abortion legal or expand it. It should have been an overwhelming landslide vote in both those states to overcome even the voter fraud, but it didn't.</div><div><br /></div><div>The people have flatly rejected Christ. I see it all the time. I see it when people say that they don't care what consenting adults do in their private lives, forgetting Jesus's lessons on the yeast of the Pharisees.</div><div><br /></div><div>I see it with the Christians who declare that racism is a sin, forgetting that Jesus said some things that would be considered racist by modern standards, and thus they elevate themselves above Christ Himself. Meanwhile, they do not acknowledge their true sins of Pride, Envy, and Lust.</div><div><br /></div><div>I see it with the Christians who declare that their church is the one true church forgetting that Paul himself admonished the Corinthians for such nonsense. And thus, we all bicker and argue over pointless things and fail to unite against the rampant sin and evil that is in our midst.</div><div><br /></div><div>The planks in our eyes are massive.</div><div><br /></div><div>Our women do not submit to men. Instead, men simp for women leaders and are happy when they get elected, even though they are the worst possible people to be in those roles.</div><div><br /></div><div>As a result, our government is now bullying the rest of the world to engage in abortion, sodomy, and usury. The isolated communists and Islamic countries are more moral than the US, even though they deny Christ.</div><div><br /></div><div>So I see many people who seek God and His Son building things to replace what was lost. But such things are nothing more than folly, a chasing after the wind. It is materialism, just like the sons of the devil, and it seems to lack any kind of spirituality.</div><div><br /></div><div>Do you say to have many children? St. Paul had none and he had no regrets. St. Philip had four daughters who could prophesy and he was teleported to different locations. Do your daughters have the Holy Spirit upon them? Do your sons proclaim the Christ? Do you focus on what truly matters? Are you not worth many sparrows? Your barns are full but your lives will be accounted for soon.</div><div><br /></div><div>I say these things not to shame you but to challenge you. We need a real spiritual awakening in this country. We need the Holy Spirit to spread across this land more than ever. We need the demons to scream in pain as they are driven out by Christ.</div><div><br /></div><div>And all you do is take pride in your works, bicker about who is a grifter, and boast about the size of your family.</div><div><br /></div><div>Take time to really focus on God. See if He will intervene not just in your own life but that He would pour His Spirit out on our nation and the people here. Yes, things are broken, but they can be fixed and God is good at doing that. But we have to turn back to Him and stop talking nonsense and doing evil.</div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-16324604973837190002022-11-03T20:25:00.001-04:002022-11-03T20:25:05.485-04:00Deep State Watergate<p>I just finished reading <em>Born Again<strong> </strong></em>by Charles Colson.  It’s a solid book and I recommend it.  Colson gives us a brief overview of his time as a political operative, starting in Boston, and becoming one of President Nixon’s top men in the Whitehouse.</p> <p>The book is not really about that, though.  Most of his narrative surrounding Nixon and Watergate springboard for telling his conversion to accept Christ and became one of His mightiest disciples in our modern era.  You have to understand that this man was involved in one of the greatest political scandals of his time and through all of that he came to Christ and ended up finding redemption, forgiveness, and serving restitution to those he had wronged.</p> <p>So overall, it is a good read and I’d recommend it because firsthand account of what happened during those times that won’t be watered down by stupid high school textbooks, communist journalists, or stuffy professors who have never had to face the possibility of prison time in their miserable lives.</p> <p>To his credit, Colson never did anything wrong with regards to the Watergate break-in or had anything to do with the subsequent cover-up but he does admit that what he was imprisoned for was legitimate.  He did commit obstruction of justice against Dr. Daniel Ellsberg during his trial for releasing the Pentagon Papers.</p> <p>And this is what I want to focus on.  Charles Colson states in this book that he never ordered the Watergate break-in and that he tried bothered to cover it up.  The most you could say he did was making the mistake of hiring Howard Hunt, the man behind the actual break-in, as he was a, supposedly, former CIA operative.</p> <p>This part stuck out to me.  While it’s not a significant part of the narrative of the overall book, it does shed some interesting light on the truth about the whole Watergate affair.</p> <p>The Watergate operation was more than likely not an operation to bug the Democrat campaign, but it was an operation perpetrated by the CIA and the Deep State to discredit Nixon in some fashion.  The operation was botched, that much cannot be in doubt, but at the same time, if they had succeeded, the end result would have been the same.  The bugs would have very likely been discovered by Democrat party members and the scandal would’ve perpetuated anyway, especially if the CIA decided to tip them off.</p> <p>When Colson found out about the break-in, he found out when everyone else did by reading about it in the local newspapers.  He states in his book that despite being a political hatchet man, he would have never resorted to such tactics as they were incredibly stupid.  President Nixon personally called him to confirm whether or not Colson had ordered the break-in and Colson stated as much and Nixon agreed.  The Watergate break-in was an independent operation done by E. Howard Hunt and G. Gordon Libby designed to bring low a man who commanded massive popular support among the American people.</p> <p>In the book, Colson states that at one point he was given access to CIA documents which showed they were trying to frame Colson as a means of deflecting attention away from the CIA.  He also states that Bob Woodward was a CIA asset.  My guess is that the whole reason the Watergate scandal got as big as it did was because the CIA was pushing their narrative in the press and drumming up as much anti-Nixon fervor as they could.  They didn’t care about the country or the duly elected officials.  They wanted to protect their own skins and if that meant making a popular president look like a sack of shit, so be it.</p> <p>I’m not exactly sure why the CIA went so far as to get Nixon to resign.  Perhaps they were afraid of his power.  He did win the 1972 election with 61% of the popular vote and 49 states.  People were back then, as they are today, completely disgusted with the radical Left’s insanity.  It’s something that gets overlooked in your public skool history lessons where the hippies are often the good guys fighting against wicked old men like Nixon.  But that wasn’t the case then and it isn’t the case now.</p> <p>Fortunately, the Watergate scandal backfired on the CIA as well.  I doubt we would have had the Church Committee investigations if nothing had happened.  The whole Watergate incident should have fizzled out.  Had the people trusted Nixon a little bit more and had Nixon been a little less paranoid, maybe he would have never resigned in disgrace.  The truth is, Nixon had nothing to do with the break-in and it doesn’t look like he was trying to cover anything up.  The Whitehouse tapes pretty much proved all of that.</p> <p>But the truth is not something that the general public deals in.  The truth was the Charles Colson was innocent of everything surrounding Watergate, that he was merely a shrewd political operative but not so unscrupulous as to plant bugs in the offices of his rivals, especially when his side was winning so soundly.</p> <p>It should be noted that Howard Hunt has been fingered as one of the men behind the JFK assassination.  I don’t know how true that is, as this was all inconclusive based on faulty deathbed confessions of his, but given how Watergate was executed outside of the Nixon administration and Republican party’s wishes, it would not surprise me.</p> <p>Whatever the case is, I suppose we’ll never know the full extent of it.  I still don’t have a clear motive for why the CIA sandbagged Nixon myself, but it is very likely that they did it.</p> <p>And sometimes, evil men do things for no reason at all other than to hurt others.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-34733335314783715622022-10-13T19:51:00.001-04:002022-10-13T19:51:45.857-04:00A Review of The Hellbound Heart by Clive Barker<p><em>The Hellbound Heart</em> is a novella by Clive Barker about the wages of the sins of the flesh and how it affects the people around you.  While it incorporates the supernatural with the demonic cenobites of the Order of the Gash, by and large, it is a story about how the lack of moderation can ultimately destroy and damn you.</p> <p>Of course, this novella was adapted into a movie, <em>Hellraiser</em>, and its many sequels, although only this novella and Barker’s <em>Scarlet Gospels</em> feature the Cenobites prominently.  I’m going to focus on the novella in this review, though, because very few people have read it compared to those who have watched the movie.</p> <p>The narrative of the novella shows us the perspective of the four primary characters Frank, Julia, Kristy, and Rory.  I’m going to do a breakdown of each of these four characters from the novella since the story is told from their perspectives, though not in first person.</p> <h2>Frank</h2> <p>Frank is the first character we meet in the story and he’s an outright sociopath and Sigma male.  He has little regard for authority, and it is hinted that entire adult life before the story begins is one of pursuing the most extreme sexual conquests while also committing petty crimes to get by, although he may have committed some more heinous crimes.  He has little regard for others and only views people in terms of how he can exploit them in some capacity or another.</p> <p>He is an apex human predator, through and through.  This predatory nature that he has, though, makes him probably the most honest and confident character in the entire story.  When he sees Kristy for the first time, he immediately recognizes that she the kind of woman who, while suffering from anxiety issues, is a ton of fun once you break down her inhibitions, more so than Julia.</p> <p>Frank starts out in his abandoned grandmother’s house performing a basic ritual to summon the Cenobites of the Order of the Gash.  He had heard of them through one of his criminal friends and performed a series of small favors to obtain the Lemarchand Configuration.  He was given instructions on what offerings he was to prepare and once that was done, he then spent several hours dismantling the box.  Once the puzzle box was solved by taking it apart, the Cenobites appear.</p> <p>Frank is, at first, appalled by their appearances.  Three of them are androgynous in appearance, largely due to their mutilations, with the fourth covered in robes, though later depicted as definitely female, albeit with her own mutilations.  After getting over the initial shock of their appearance. Frank demands that they show him the heights of their pleasures, despite their warnings to him.</p> <p>After this, he is essentially dragged to the world where they routinely torture Frank and then leave him in a space that is just beyond the walls of where he had summoned the Cenobites.  He’s basically torn apart and put back together in the barest of pieces when this happens.  When his brother Rory bleeds over a semen stain he left behind, he is able to communicate with Julia, with whom he had an affair before she married Rory, and uses her to provide him with the blood of foolish hook-ups to gain more and more of his body back in the our world.</p> <p>Eventually he murders his own brother to steal his skin to wear in an attempt to trick the Cenobites.  He fails, however, and ends up back in their world in the end.</p> <h2>Julia</h2> <p>Julia is Rory’s wife, though she constantly pines for Frank ever since they had an affair just before her wedding.  It is stated that she deliberately seduced him, by having him visit her while she was trying on her wedding dress and allowed him to essentially “rape” her.  As a result, she despises Rory and all that he stands, secretly wanting to run off with Frank at some point.</p> <p>We aren’t given much about Julia’s background, but it’s clear that she’s a snob and knows exactly her power as a beautiful woman.  She easily picks up men on three separate occasions, convincing them to come to her home while Rory is at work, and murdering them for Frank.  By the time she gets to the third victim, she shows little regard for him, knowing full well that he’s a married man with children and even aiding Frank to kill him when he gets cold feet and has a crisis of conscious.</p> <p>Julia’s tragedy is that she doesn’t know how good she really has things.  Rory, while boring to her, is stable, has a career and is ambitious enough to move up, and has a really nice house to live in.  But she rejects stability for the thrill of whatever it is that Frank is going to do, to the point that she’s willing to murder for him.</p> <p>Instead, when she has sex with Rory, she pretends he’s Frank and the mere act of sexual intercourse with Rory becomes a basic act of anatomy to her.  She only does it to keep Rory happy and only when she’s not left much of a choice otherwise.  More than likely, had Frank not returned, she probably would have divorced Rory eventually.</p> <p>Frank, for his part, doesn’t love Julia like she loves him.  Instead, he merely sees her as a tool, first as a sexual object, and second as a way to escape the Order of the Gash.  When Frank accidentally stabs her, he feeds on her like how he fed on her previous hook-ups.  She is then damned to the same world as Frank, or at least that is the implication in the end.</p> <h2>Rory</h2> <p>Rory is the character with the least amount of narrative and backstory, probably because he is the everyman of the story.  And that’s by and large the tragedy of Rory.  He’s bland, vanilla, weak, and married to a woman who is completely out of his league.  He’s the typical Delta man who is working toward what the vast majority of men want at the end of the day: a family, a home, and a stable income.</p> <p>Frank has little regard for his brother Rory.  He is only 18 months older than Rory and both brothers were apparently very close growing up but once Frank reached a certain, he decided to pursue his hedonistic pursuits which disgusted Rory who clearly desired a normal life.</p> <p>So while Rory himself is a normal, nice guy who gets along with everyone and has a stable career that is one the rise, he is also very naïve.  He fails to see his own wife’s contempt for him, being only vaguely aware of it, and ultimately his naivety is what causes his death.  Of course, it’s not like he could have predicted that his brother Frank was hiding in his house as a skinless monster from “Hell” and was looking to kill him for his own skin.  But still, he should have seen through Julia’s lies and deceit if he had his brother’s instincts.</p> <p>It’s stated that Frank would oftentimes return to their parents’ house and horrify them with his tales of his exploits.  Rory should have listened to Frank and maybe inquired as to how he was able to seduce so many women instead of outright rejecting him.  At least then he probably wouldn’t have married Julia and ended up a massive heap of flesh on the floor.</p> <h2>Kristy</h2> <p>Kristy is Rory’s friend.  Not much is said about how Rory and Kristy became friends, but it’s made clear early on that Kristy is deeply in love with Rory and later on it is stated that she recognizes Frank for what he is when she first met him during Rory and Julia’s wedding preparations and that she was creeped out by him.</p> <p>Kristy is mousy and very shy.  She’s also implied to be less attractive than Julia but more friendly.  It’s implied in her introduction that Julia is fully aware of Kristy’s attraction to Rory and that more than secretly delights in the fact that Rory is hers, even though Julia hates him.</p> <p>Frank, for his part, recognizes that Kristy is the kind of woman who would be a lot of fun in bed should her inhibitions drop as he has seduced similar women in the past.  In his two encounters with her, he outright attempts to rape her, despite the first time not having skin and the second time wearing his brother’s skin, albeit loosely.</p> <p>Kristy, for her part, has a surprising amount of strength and resilience, something that catches Frank off guard.  And while she doesn’t exactly kick his ass with little effort, she doesn’t get overwhelmed either.</p> <p>Her relationship with Rory is fairly close, almost like brother and sister, though clearly Kristy wants more.  Rory even contacts her to figure out what is going with Julia after Julia starts killing men to bring Frank back.  When Kristy does investigate, she initially suspects that Julia is having an affair, which is devastating to her.  This is because she knows that she would have to tell Rory and that it would taint any potential relationship with him.  While she can’t stand Julia and hates Rory being with her, she also believes that Rory might see her snitching as an attempt to get Rory for herself instead of genuine concern for Rory.</p> <p>The narrative at the end of the novella focuses mostly on Kristy.  After her first encounter with Frank, she is able to obtain the puzzle box and solves it herself.  Because she did so accidentally, only one of the Cenobites appears (not the pinhead one) knowing this.  It still says that she has to come with it, but when Kristy is able to convince it that Frank got free of them, it agrees to exchange him for her, provided he confesses as to who he is.  This gamble pays off and Frank is reclaimed by his sadistic torturers, along with Julia.  The Cenobites keep their end of the bargain and Kristy is allowed to leave with the box.  She sees images of Frank and Julia in it, but not Rory and wonders if there is another device to the world where Rory is.</p> <p>Kristy’s failing is that she wasn’t assertive enough to secure Rory before he married Julia.  Women are usually the ones who pick the men, men merely offer themselves as an opportunity.  At the end of the day, it is generally women who pick the man they want to hook up with, date, or marry.  If Kristy had approached Rory, there is a very good chance she would have settled down with him and lived a happy life, in spite of Frank.  Instead, she ended up enduring a nightmare that ended with her love dead and her psyche shattered.  As far as I know, she doesn’t show up in any further stories even though most of Clive Barker’s works are linked together in some fashion.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>The novella overall is really good and I would recommend it if you’re a fan of horror, or at the very least can stand some gore and some sexual scenes.  The sexual scenes are not put in the novella for exploitation and very little is described of them.  They have a purpose to show how Frank is able to return and to demonstrate just how messed up Julia is in regards to her marriage with Rory.  One scene has her engage Rory while the door to Frank’s room is slightly ajar with her looking into the darkness knowing that Frank is watching.</p> <p>You may expect the Cenobites to be central to the plot of this story, but they are not.  At best, they are merely the drivers for Frank’s growing desperation to escape them.  We are given an account of them in the beginning and the end.  Sadistic as they are, they appear to have some level of honor as they warn Frank about their nature and they hold up their end of their bargain with Kristy.</p> <p>The movie <em>Hellraiser</em> is a close adaptation, having been directed by Clive Barker himself, but I feel that the novella has a lot of elements that you just can’t translate well on screen.  And while there are some plot holes in the story, I would say it is worth the read.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-43847434903430328702022-10-05T20:26:00.001-04:002022-10-05T20:26:17.381-04:00The Medical Grift<p>The medical industry in the US is probably one of the biggest grifts of all time.</p> <p>I say this because they have been very successful at keeping Americans insanely unhealthy while simultaneously selling drugs that are supposed to cure them of their unhealthy ways.  Yes, the food industry is complacent in all of this, but organizations like the American Medical Association or the American Heart Association should be lobbying in Congress to ban things like corn syrup and demanding that processed food meet healthier standards.  They’d also demand that the food stamp program limit itself to organic foods.</p> <p>Instead, they are very clearly looking to make as much money as they can from the average American while keeping them just healthy enough to live to age 70.  Then they do a prescription drug bomb on the idiots who are stuck in Medicare which probably does more harm than good in the long term.  And then they all end up in nursing homes where they don’t bother feeding the elderly folks good food, just slop and pudding.</p> <p>Meanwhile, if I get sick, I go to the doctor and the doctor runs tests.  If the tests come back negative, I’m told to eat shit and go home with no prescriptions for antibiotics or anything else.  Nevermind that if I started taking antibiotics right around then, I might be able to avoid getting a serious infection down the road.  But that’s why I was sent home.</p> <p>Because they’ll make more money if I have to come back to the office.</p> <p>It’s the same with my kids.  Doctors don’t give a flying fuck about what the parents say and oftentimes flat out ignore you when discussing your child’s health.  It is astounding to watch as these pompous assholes sit there and lecture you on nearly every aspect of child-rearing while having a bulletin board of nonsense in the background like how breast milk contains more mercury than vaccines (if I have to explain to you the difference between ingestion and injection, you’re a moron or a liar).</p> <p>At the same time, priorities in care often favor the people groups with the most unhealthy lifestyles.  This may be inadvertent, but I’ve noticed that the gay community gets special treatment, probably because they have so many stupidly avoidable health problems.  I remember reading a story about how there were gay men getting unidentifiable stomach parasites from rimming each other and they were getting doled out antibiotics as if they were candy.  But try getting that same medicine for your child.  You have a better chance of escaping a hippo attack on the Nile while riding a log raft.</p> <p>This isn’t limited to the gay community either.  My mother works at a hospital and related a story about a woman who shows up every couple of weeks because she has Type-II Diabetes and refuses to properly take care of herself.  So she’s in the hospital for free treatments for something she could easily have fixed herself.</p> <p>And then the COVID thing hit and the entire medical industry went fucking insane.  Or maybe the masks of sanity were just discarded.</p> <p>The hospital policies were taken directly from government bureaucrats, who were lying, and then they stacked their own policies on top, like prioritizing treatments for blacks and Hispanics.  Because Martin Luthor King, Jr. said so or some bullshit like that.  Also George Floyd mumbled something about it just before he choked to death on Fentanyl.</p> <p>Economically, the United States Medical Industry isn’t Socialist nor is it Capitalist.  One could hardly call it Corporatist either since even those rules don’t seem to apply.  I don’t know what economic model you could fit it into, but I’m sure whoever figures it out should win a Nobel Prize.  And no, these problems will not be fixed with Medicare for All because that just gives the greedy executives a permanent stream of income and no incentive to improve care.</p> <p>A fully unregulated and non-subsidized Medical Industry won’t solve these problems either.  This is because the problem with medical care is largely due to our cultural attitudes towards it.  We need to stop treating medical care like it’s a necessity in our lives, encourage each other to eat healthier, and only go see the doctor when we are sick.  If you have a prescription medicine, look into possible alternatives.</p> <p>And we need to make most drugs available over the counter.  That whole system is simply stupid to begin with because some over the counter drugs are much more dangerous than drugs that you have to acquire via prescription.  Imagine how much time you would save if you could just buy your antibiotics at a local drug store without a prescription?</p> <p>Anyhow, I think a big shift will be taking place soon enough.  The whole COVID “pandemic” incident has awaken a lot of Americans to the high-levels of corruption in the American medical system.  Hopefully, that will translate into better healthcare for all and a better system.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-3387842754922359702022-10-04T19:41:00.001-04:002022-10-04T19:41:47.487-04:00On Quiet QuittingThere has been a new complaint in the corporate world that I believe is the result of mass remote working. It's a term called "Quiet Quitting" and it is something that has been hitting all the major news outlets lately.<div><br></div><div>Basically, the term refers to an employee, usually a white-collar employee, who does what is perceived as the minimum amount of work required of him or her to maintain their job and collect a paycheck. It usually has a negative connotation when it is discussed in most mainstream outlets and executive circles.</div><div><br></div><div>The thing is, the Quiet Quitting phenomenon seems to be have arisen because white-collar employees started working remotely on a large scale following the COVID-19 insanity. My best guess is that people took the time reevaluate their value and realized that they are only paid for 40 hours a week. Nothing more.</div><div><br></div><div>They also realized that they won't ever advance in their careers if they were just working extra hours. In fact, working extra hours usually will, at best, not be recognized by your manager or, at worst, intimidate your manager because they might think you are trying to get their job.</div><div><br></div><div>Simply working long hours for no pay isn't the only thing that gets you promoted. Simply doing your job is not what gets you promoted. So if you work long hours doing the work you've been assigned, you more than likely will not advance in your career. From what I can tell, most career advancement occurs when you find a new job that has higher pay and a higher position. Very few companies offer any chance of career advancement or even lay out a plan to allow you to advance.</div><div><br></div><div>And let's be honest: not everyone can become a leader in a given organization. A leader with no followers is just an asshole on a soapbox. So really, there is nothing wrong with being a Delta in the corporate world, especially if you are content in your job.</div><div><br></div><div>That being said, there is nothing wrong with advancing your career or working extra for your employer, provided that you understand that if you are paid a salary, you are not compensated for that extra time.</div><div><br></div><div>By the same token, it is perfectly okay to simply do the job you are paid to do. If your employer feels that you should do more, ask for more money in return. If this gets you fired, look at it as an opportunity to find a better job. The corporate world is a mercenary one and you need to know that your job is never permanent. I currently work at a contracting company but I am well aware that someday the contracts will dry up, at least the ones that I work on, and I will have to leave. God-Willing, that won't be anytime soon, but you never know.</div><div><br></div><div>In short, the term Quiet Quitting is being to shame employees into working more instead of recognizing their value and allowing them to work on their terms. If you as an employer need more from an employee and you don't think they can meet your expectations, then just fire them instead of shaming them. This isn't high school, this is supposed to be real world.</div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-90144067792484387142022-09-27T18:00:00.001-04:002022-09-27T18:00:52.188-04:00Ramblings<p>Our country is on the cusp of a massive shift in power and culture.  The endgame is not certain, but war is on the horizon now.  Whether this truly is a massive war or fades out much like the previous horseman of pestilence did, that remains to be seen.</p> <p>At some point, we lost our way.  Our nation decided to upend all of its core values because of some farcical notions of freedom and liberty.</p> <p>We have freedom now.  Freedom from children.  Freedom from reason.  Freedom from faith.  Freedom from God.</p> <p>But we don’t have the freedom to say what we want.  I guess technically we do, but the consequences of that freedom makes us prisoners.  And when we try to break out, the consequences could leave us without a voice or without a means to sustain ourselves.</p> <p>We have the freedom to practice sodomy at our leisure.  We can murder children, provided they aren’t breathing air yet.  We can watch all the pornography we want.</p> <p>And we have forgotten that we die to sin, that we died to sin, and that we are trapped in sin.  That when the Founding Fathers spoke of freedom, many of them spoke in terms of freedom from sin because that was their background.  Like it or not, they were Christian men.  Sure, we could squabble over their various individual beliefs, but at the end of the day, this nation was founded on British identity, Christian belief, and Greco-Roman philosophy.</p> <p>Now we have abandoned it all in favor of madness, irrationality, and insanity.  Those of us who wish to return to reason cling to a piece of paper that was abandoned long ago, by a tyrant with a stupidly tall hat.  I mean, seriously, do you think Lincoln would have left office after second term if he hadn’t been shot in the head?</p> <p>Objectively, ever since this nation has achieved loser immigration standards, women’s suffrage, so-called “equal rights”, abortion rights, gay rights, gay marriage, porn as free speech, and free trade are we really better off?  Is your life really better now that you can see tons of naked women online?  Has so-called diversity really enriched your life?  How’s that no-fault divorce working out for you now that you’ve ditched your husband?  Are you really happy with it all now?</p> <p>Our churches talk of oppression and racism as great evils, neither of which are even mentioned in the Bible, let along considered a sin.  Heck, by modern standards, Jesus, Peter, and Paul were all racists and misogynists.  But please, do continue to allow women to teach men on how to behave in the church.</p> <p>I guess I am just tired of all this bullshit.  The whole world wants me dead, wants my boys to be girls, wants my wife to be unhappy and unhealthy, and they all get angry when I tell them no.  Like I’m the asshole because I want to live and protect my family as I see fit.</p> <p>And everywhere I turn, I see no support, just more bullshit.  Even the right-wing is full of garbage and nonsense.  It’s like nobody can be bothered to listen to God.</p> <p>Then again, I’m not alone in that last part but I feel like I’m the only one who is at least trying to attain the wisdom I need to maintain my sanity and dignity.</p> <p>The president recently said that people like me are incapable of being happy.  And while I don’t actively seek out happiness, I could be a lot happier if I wasn’t being forced to grin and bear it all.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-77627831147653756732022-09-26T22:56:00.002-04:002022-09-27T17:12:16.467-04:00Fisking Scott Lively’s Open Letter to Andrew Torba<p>Recently, Andrew Torba released a book outlining his idea of the philosophy of Christian Nationalism. While I have not read his work yet, I read an <a href="https://www.wnd.com/2022/09/open-letter-gabs-andrew-torba-regarding-christian-nationalism/">article written by Scott Lively about it</a> and I had a few problems with it. So, in the spirit of Larry Correia, I’m going to fisk it. Pastor Lively’s words will be in <em>italics</em> and my responses will be in <strong>bold</strong>.</p> <p><em>Dear Brother Andrew. I am a Hebraic-oriented evangelical Christian attorney, pastor and historian who has devoted my entire adult life in Christ to Christian social, cultural and political activism. I bought your book "Christian Nationalism" to support the mission of Gab Social and want to offer you some constructive criticism.</em></p> <p><strong>So far, he’s off to a good start, but I’m wary of the “constructive criticism” phrase. That term doesn’t usually mean anything constructive when it comes to Internet writings, but I’ll give Pastor Lively the benefit of the doubt since I don’t think he’s delving into 4Chan or Kiwi Farms.</strong></p> <p><em>At the outset, I want to commend you for your courage and vision in taking on the powers and principalities of the present age by working to break the chains of censorship and suppression of free speech, particularly of the biblically informed views that so powerfully contradict the secular humanist dogma of our Marxist would-be masters. They are the true enemies of "Judeo-Christian" civilization, and of course I choose that phrase intentionally to respectfully contradict your well-intentioned but misguided representation of its meaning and purpose relative to our national identity and heritage.</em></p> <p><strong>I see what the aforementioned “constructive criticism” was targeting. He’s not really happy with Torba making a distinction between Christianity and modern Judaism. The problem that Scott Lively seems to have is that he probably doesn’t understand where the ideas of secular humanist dogma and Marxism came from. Here’s a hint: none of these ideas originated from European Christian scholars.</strong></p> <p><em>I will also add that I am both a member of Gab and a vehement defender of your right to address the distinctions between Judaism and Christianity. I do not consider you an anti-Semite and in fact believe that the secularized ethnic Jews working to destroy your work are actually far more anti-Semitic than they claim you are in that they deny and/or defy the Torah, whereas you worship and revere its Author.</em></p> <p><strong>It is said that the Talmud permits what the Torah forbids and this is certainly true in your statement about “secularized ethnic Jews”. However, many of these “secular Jews” claim that abortion is a sacred rite for Judaism and have problem posting this stance on Twitter and calling anyone who opposes them “anti-Semitic”.</strong></p> <p><strong>Also, I’m sure Andrew Torba is happy to know that you don’t consider him an anti-Semite. Governor Greg Abbott of Texas would disagree with you.</strong></p> <p><em>What defines a "Semite" (Shemite) if not Yahweh-worship? It certainly can't be an ethnic connection to Shem (or Abraham or even Jacob), which virtually all humanity now shares because of genetic diffusion over millennia. No, it must be the practice of true Judaism, whose terms are defined by the Torah and Tanach (Old Testament Scripture), NOT the Talmud (commentaries on the Scripture by various Hebrew scholars with widely divergent views, values and validity).</em></p> <p><strong>Respectfully sir, I disagree with your statement. Very few, if any, modern Jews practice solely what we call the “Old Testament” and, in fact, many use the Talmudic text far more often than what is found in the Torah. And while I do regard that different sects probably have different versions of the Talmud, that doesn’t matter. Talmudic texts are their primary source of their religion these days and these texts are incompatible with Christianity and Western philosophy in general.</strong></p> <p><em>Indeed, Judaism itself is as factional as Christianity but on a smaller scale, only because it's so much smaller in numbers. Jews are not just doctrinally divided, but notoriously so! As the famous old joke goes, "Ask two Jews, get three opinions." Thus, to cite the view of any Talmudic "sage" as representative of all Jews or Judaism itself (as you did on page 56) is as intellectually dishonest as an anti-Christian Jew or Secular Humanist cherry-picking from the collective works of Christian scholars to define all Christianity.</em></p> <p><strong>Not everyone has the time or patience to sit down and go through all the various doctrinal differences between the different sects of Judaism or Christianity for that matter. However, both religions hold very basic core values. For Christianity, you need look no further than the Apostle’s Creed as a statement of fundamental faith. Modern Judaism rejects the Apostle’s Creed outright. It is literally a religion that built around the rejection of Jesus as the Christ, or Messiah.</strong></p> <p><strong>Which is an odd thing, if you think about it. There are sects of Islam which have reverence for Jesus, not as God’s Son, but as a prophet in the same vein as their prophet Muhammad. Most of other religions are built around the idea of revering a spiritual or divine entity. But Judaism seems hell-bent on flatly rejecting Jesus, along with the Satanists and the secularists.</strong></p> <p><em>You begin Chapter 4, "This is Not a 'Judeo-Christian' Movement," asserting that "Christianity and Judaism are totally distinct, incompatible, and irreconcilable religions." In one essential sense that is true because, as you emphasize, Judaism denies that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. BUT, unlike all the other people groups of the world that also deny Christ (including all the secular factions in our diverse MAGA and populist/conservative movements whom you rightfully seem very comfortable collaborating with), true Torah-faithful Jews believe in a Messiah who will do all that things that Christians anticipate Jesus Christ will do on His second coming. They simply "missed the bus" on Jesus/Yeshua during His first advent (by God's own plan), but remain standing in line for the next one, which Romans 11 tells us they will catch, when (as God adds in Zechariah 12:10) "I will pour out on the house of David and on the people of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and prayer, and they will look on Me, the One they have pierced [and] mourn for Him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for Him as one grieves for a firstborn son."</em></p> <p><strong>Okay, you are way off base here. There is a lot of rationalization for what should to obvious to you, a learned man of Christ.</strong></p> <p><strong>First of all, they didn’t simply miss the bus. We are told in Acts that the Jews outright persecuted the Christians and even chased them down in the Gentile towns and had them persecuted there as well. In fact, there is very little persecution from the Gentiles in the book of Acts until Paul preaches in Ephesus, but that persecution had more to do with money than religion.</strong></p> <p><strong>They didn’t miss the bus. They literally tried to run it off the road.</strong></p> <p><strong>As for your reference to Romans 11, you misinterpret it completely. Paul does not say that the Jews will come back to the fold and recognize Jesus as the Messiah sent by God, but merely relates that such a thing would be a wondrous thing to behold. Indeed, Paul writes in verse 12, “Now if their trespass means riches for the world, and if their failure means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean!”</strong></p> <p><strong>As for the verse you cited in Zechariah, God could very well be only referring to the disciples of Jesus. This does not necessarily mean all the Jews everywhere.</strong></p> <p><em>You and I presumably share all or most of what would be considered the most fundamental tenets of the Christian faith, and many non-essential doctrines too. But we differ strongly on "supersessionism" (replacement theology) which you defend as the justification for your personal theology. Importantly, what you have laid out in "Christian Nationalism" is your personal theology, which does not represent Christianity as a whole, but only one slate of views among the constellation of denominations. That's not a problem insofar as you admit it and don't attempt to impose your interpretations on non-essentials as dogma on the rest of Christendom.</em></p> <p><strong>I’m not going to completely presume what Andrew Torba’s personal theology is, but I’m going to state the Christian Nationalism isn’t a theology. It is a political movement that emphasizes Christianity and nationalism, or rather, one that honors both God and country alongside fellow countrymen. And yes, the Captive Christians in the United States are well aware of that Christian Nationalism isn’t the overarching dogma of Christianity in the United States. Yet.</strong></p> <p><em>The flaw in your analysis of supersessionism (page 57) is the appeal to tradition (one of the </em><a href="https://www.artofmanliness.com/character/knowledge-of-men/classical-rhetoric-101-logical-fallacies/"><em>classic fallacies of formal logic</em></a><em>). Whenever we justify ourselves by church tradition instead of the Bible itself, we depart from sound Holy Spirit guidance to tenuous worldly humanism – the common error behind Roman Catholicism's self-authorizing "Magisterium" theory and Talmudic Judaism's self-authorizing "Revered Sages" club. Correcting that error in Christendom was the implicit premise of the Reformation, but unfortunately, the reformers failed to reform numerous extra-biblical human-created doctrines in Protestantism, including the RCC's dramatic changes to God's holiday calendar, the presumed right of the church to enforce dogma through murder (e.g. Calvin's </em><a href="https://www.gotquestions.org/Calvin-Michael-Servetus.html"><em>execution of Michael Servetus</em></a><em>), and a severe Greco-Roman cultural bias in interpreting Scripture that differs markedly from the Hebraic cultural perspective of the Apostles and the Prophets.</em></p> <p><strong>The Protestant Reformation started because the Catholic Church clung to power over Truth. Martin Luthor’s theses were written to declare that the Catholic Church was in error with regard to the salvation of Jesus where they were essentially commanding people to buy their way into heaven. This is a very basic overview of the situation though.</strong></p> <p><strong>In truth, you have to look at the Great Schism and the Protestant Reformation in a similar vein to the Tower of Babel and the division of Israel under Rehoboam, Solomon’s son. In all these cases, the institutions God established became large and prideful, which resulted in God dividing them in order to humble the proud and to ensure that His Truth was firmly established.</strong></p> <p><em>Many of those human-created doctrines were quickly jettisoned as Protestantism splintered into numerous factions, such as Presbyterianism, which made the world-changing quantum shift from the top-down ecclesiastical power-pyramid exemplified by the papacy (and Anglicanism) to bottom-up self governance authorized by the "priesthood of all believers" and organized like the Jerusalem Council of Acts 15. THAT is the deepest foundation-stone of America and of the modern movement for constitutionalism (foreshadowed by the Magna Carta in 1215, heavily </em><a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-magna-cartas-very-jewish-underpinnings/"><em>influenced by Jews</em></a><em>).</em></p> <p><strong>Okay, I suspected you were stretching your reasoning with that last bit about the Magna Carta, so I went and read the article you cited. From what I can gather, the Jews in England were inflicting heavy debts on the English people, including requiring the children of the debtors to pay. This all parallels what we are experiencing in this day and age with student loans, mortgages, credit cards, etc. But that’s a whole other topic.</strong></p> <p><strong>The “heavy influence” the Jews had on the Magna Carta was really because of their greed. The clause cited basically prevented them from collecting debts from the children of debtors.</strong></p> <p><strong>It is fascinating to see modern Jews take credit for the Magna Carta when their greatest influence was inflicting excessive lending on the populace. Your last statement was incredibly dishonest at best.</strong></p> <p><em>The process of getting from Scottish Presbyterianism to the Pilgrim Separatism of the Plymouth Colony was also heavily influenced by Christian-Jewish cross-pollination. Indeed, I know from my studies of this, that there would never have been a U.S. Constitution or the populist overthrow of the Western monarchies if not for the 16th and 17th century Hebraic Movement in Holland and Great Britain. And that is why America is and has always been "Judeo-Christian." It has nothing to do with how many Jews were active in the physical founding of America, or how Christian-centric the first state constitutions were; it is simply an honest acknowledgment of the Jews' role in nudging Christians back to their first-century heritage that made America possible: a shared intellectual property right, if you will, like co-authors of a book or a scientific theory.</em></p> <p><strong>The US Constitution was the result of Enlightenment philosophers, none of whom were Jewish as far as I know.</strong></p> <p><strong>And your use of the term “Judeo-Christian” tells me that you do not even know the origin of that phrase. Look it up and know that modern Judeo-Christians are not allowed the right of return to Israel, unlike literally all other Jews, even those Jews convicted of pedophilia.</strong></p> <p><em>Lastly, you asserted on page 61, "It is impossible to overstate the importance of the historic cataclysm that was the Destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 A.D." Sorry, it not only IS possible, but you have done it. If that post-millennial doctrine were true, the real proof would have been unmistakable over the next thousand years, especially the end, but of course, it didn't look at all like the Millennial Kingdom of prophecy – because Christ's earthly kingdom, while very near, has not yet begun. You would know that if you studied the Bible from the literal Hebraic perspective, but you don't, and that's your right within the bounds of Christian liberty.</em></p> <p><strong>The Hedraic perspective of the New Testament isn’t one that I think many Christians would agree with. And Revelations is merely prophecy, one that cannot be interpreted until the events described in that book have happened, much like the prophecies of Isaiah and Daniel. Stop trying to fit the prophecies into a box.</strong></p> <p><strong>Remember, Jesus was condemned to death by the High Priest because He said, “destroy this temple and I will rebuild it in three days”. All the Jewish leaders present thought He was referring to the physical temple, not the His Body. After all, Jesus did say that His kingdom was not of this world and the end of Revelation makes it clear that God will make the Earth His kingdom again. How He does this is something we can only speculate on, which is a futile effort at best.</strong></p> <p><em>My point with the prior paragraph is to illustrate that factionalism will be the death-knell to any attempt to build unity on a theological foundation, which is why the founders and subsequent Christian generations chose the broadest possible platform – Bible-based Yahweh-honoring monotheism (exemplified in our national motto, "In God We Trust") – and not any flavor of Christian sectarianism (which led to many serious conflicts among the denominations in our early days as a nation and thus a ban on establishing state "religions" – meaning "denominations" – in the "Establishment Clause" of our constitution.)</em></p> <p><strong>And which unity do you desire Pastor Lively? Because the Catholics demand that all Protestants come back to their church, while ignoring the Orthodox who regard themselves as the first and true church, Catholics be damned. Meanwhile, the various Protestant denominations bicker over minor doctrinal differences that really don’t matter.</strong></p> <p><strong>And yet, at the end of the day, all denominations praise Him. We all worship and pray and do good works in His Name.</strong></p> <p><strong>So at the end of the day, do we need unity? From my perspective, Satan demands that humanity be united. But God divides us constantly ever since the Tower of Babel incident. Indeed, even Jesus Himself said that he did not come to unite us but to divide us against each other. Not necessarily in war or conflict but simply to keep us from growing too big and too proud.</strong></p> <p><em>I don't expect you to change your theology based on one letter from me, but I do hope you will reconsider your gratuitous exclusionary rhetoric regarding our spiritual cousins in the House of Judah, treating at least the many who share our cultural values and all-important Creationist paradigm with the same basic respect and camaraderie you show to atheists in the MAGA and conservative movements. And I offer my assistance in making this necessary course correction if you care to accept it.</em></p> <p><strong>The House of Judah are not our spiritual cousins. This much can be seen in how they treat us. They have been behind all the subversive movements in the United States, starting with communism, gay rights, pornography, abortion, women’s rights, civil rights, and so many other damaging societal ills, it is getting hard to keep track of all of them. Their fruits are death, perversion, and subversion.</strong></p> <p><strong>You cannot judge a group by its ideology but by its fruits, after all.</strong></p> <p><strong>Objectively, has this nation gotten better in the past 6 decades or so? We cannot isolate the decay of the United States to a single cause, but a multitude of causes, many of which seem to have the same racial/religious identity rearing its head just inside the shadows. From scientific materialism, to the elevation of psychology over spiritual healing to the destruction of the family, all of these things can be traced to some prominent Jewish thinker or pundit. We know this because they like to brag about it. It’s how Julius Rosenberg got caught, after all.</strong></p> <p><strong>If you don’t believe me, then look no further than the current Biden administration. You may want to note how many Jews are Cabinet members, which I think is a first for a Presidential administration.</strong></p> <p><strong>Christian Nationalism is not a theology or a dogma, it is a movement to try and reclaim Western civilizations back into the hands of the Christian nationals whose ancestors founded and built these lands before the parasitic money-lenders, whom Jesus Himself whipped thousands of years ago, came to us.</strong></p> <p><strong>Let me end this fisking with a question: we all regard the Jews as God’s Chosen people, but what exactly were they chosen for? If you cannot answer that simple question honestly and make the proper logical inference from it, then you are a fool in the Biblical sense.</strong></p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-35664940077591712322022-09-20T19:44:00.001-04:002022-09-20T19:44:56.835-04:00The Perception of RealityOver the weekend, my brother and I traveled to attend our cousin's wedding. We didn't take our families with us because it was a no kids allowed affair so we left the kids with our wives and rode together.<div><br></div><div>Naturally, we had a lot of conversations along the way up and back to the party location. One of the topics that came up was the idea of forensic evidence versus eye witness accounts. I stated that forensic evidence was, for the most part, circumstancial at best and that eye witness testimony that is corraborated by multiple witnesses is the gold standard of evidence of a crime.</div><div><br></div><div>He believed that eye witness testimony can be flawed. But he did concede that forensic evidence generally doesn't prove that someone committed a crime and is circumstancial at best. Just because someone's fingerprint is on a weapon, for example, doesn't mean that a person murdered someone with it. It just means the suspect handled the weapon.</div><div><br></div><div>Keep in mind, the full extent of our experiences with the judicial system are limited to traffic tickets and my brother's most recent jury duty obligation. It was a day and they found the defendant not guilty of being a convicted felon with a gun. My brother was actually going to vote not guilty regardless because he doesn't believe that should be a crime, but fortunately the prosecution's case was so bad, he didn't need to argue that.</div><div><br></div><div>Anyway, we are not experts and, like the vast majority of Americans, our experience with the judicial system and the police force comes mostly from crime dramas, not actual experience.</div><div><br></div><div>And I've noticed something about these crime dramas over the years. They tend to focus more on forensic evidence and psychological experts than actual witnesses to the crimes.</div><div><br></div><div>I don't know if this is intentional but it is a disturbing trend to me. You see, if you read the Torah in the Old Testament, you'll note that God's standard of evidence relies mostly on eye witness accounts. This is why not bearing false witness was considered one of the 10 commandments. It was considered paramount that you tell the truth when recounting a crime to he ruling authorities.</div><div><br></div><div>In fact, God even commanded that you could only execute someone for a crime on the account of two or three witnesses. Otherwise, said person was basically supposed to live in exile in a sanctuary city or face the avenger of blood, that is, a relative of the person who was killed. It was a simpler justice system back then.</div><div><br></div><div>But the emphasis that God places on eye witness accounts runs much deeper than just criminal justice. It's almost as if God is telling us that our eyes were not created to lie to us. But look at how people these days try to tell us that our eyes are wrong, that reality is different than what we see.</div><div><br></div><div>Certainly, there are other dimesions and wavelengths we cannot see, but we can perceive them in other ways through various measurements. But our flesh is how we interact with God's creations and our eyes are how we perceive most of it.</div><div><br></div><div>The prevailing push from Western science seems to be one that tells us to not believe our eyes, that we are being tricked, and that we should trust what the science says. But science is more limiting than most people realize.</div><div><br></div><div>For example, how many people have claimed to have seen Bigfoot? Regardless of whether or not you think Bigfoot is real, you cannot deny the eye witness accounts. And whether the vast majority of these people are lying, mistaken what they've seen for something else, or just had their imaginations go wild, there still are dozens of people who have seen something that science denies existing.</div><div><br></div><div>By the same token, the entirety of Christianity is reliant on the eye witness testimony of a few dozen men who died thousands of years ago, many of whom suffered horrendous deaths when they refused to renounce what they saw.</div><div><br></div><div>Yet we are told to discount eye witness testimonies and to simply trust the science.</div><div><br></div><div>So maybe, just maybe, this dismissal of eye witness testimonies is intentional on the part of our enemies in order to discredit our foundational faith. It is no wonder that so many people give in to despair and hopelessness when they are told that they cannot trust their primary sensory organs to discern reality itself.</div><div><br></div><div>Now, I'm not saying that we should give up on forensic evidence or the scientific process in general. But what am I saying is that neither give us a full picture of the reality we live in and they never will. </div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-45386234732935252842022-09-09T21:47:00.001-04:002022-09-09T21:47:52.336-04:00Hating the Customer<p>The long-standing corporate strategy for the past decade or so has been to hate their customers.</p> <p>I’m sure you’ve noticed this in many products and services you have bought or considered buying.</p> <p>Take Planet Fitness, for example.  They have this thing called a “Lunk Alarm”.  It is basically an alarm for when people grunt too loud or slam their weights.  So apparently, they just want customers who are fat, out of shape, and unable to lift more than 10 pounds.  Because real hardcore weight lifters would do well to steer clear of that madness.</p> <p>Or take banks.  If you have an account with a bank, then every penny you have deposited is in actuality a loan you’ve made to them on their terms, not yours.  But try taking large amounts a cash out or paying someone a large amount of money out of your account.  Oftentimes, you hit all kinds of restrictions or filters used to supposedly protect you from fraud or scams, but why should the bank care about that?  If they were simply holding your money, then they could have zero liability for what you do with it, right?</p> <p>And don’t get me started on the mainstream entertainment companies.  Most of them produce absolute garbage and this has been going on for a long while now.</p> <p>The <em>Clash of the Titans</em> remake is an excellent example.  It has one of the most anti-Christian, pro-Satan messages I’ve ever witnessed in a movie with most people completely missing it.  The original movie was a classic hero’s journey in the vein of a Greek myth and was very well done.  The remake featured people defying the gods and then, in the end, Zeus saying to Perseus that he “wanted them to love him, but he couldn’t lose his son”.</p> <p>Seriously, we have the king of the gods telling us that he’d rather see his son live than save humanity.  Fuck that movie.</p> <p>Look at all the shit that Mel Gibson went through getting <em>The Passion of the Christ</em> made.  When <em>The Book of Eli</em> was being made, the Hollywood producers kept on complaining about how that movie was “too Christian”.</p> <p>Meanwhile, movies like that make more money than most big budget shit-shows that pass themselves off as quality storytelling.</p> <p>I remember when <em>Rambo Last Blood</em> came out and critics lambasted it as anti-Hispanic immigration.  Nevermind that the movie literally shows how useless the wall is for drug cartels who build tunnels under it.  Or that they kidnapped another Hispanic girl and raped and drugged her to death.  But I guess it’s racist to deny Mexicans the ability to peddle drugs and rape young girls.</p> <p>Customer hatred seems to be rampant in American culture right now.  Everything seems bent on ensuring that straight, white, Christian men, the ones with all the money, are shamed and humiliated for being better than them.  And there is no doubt that we are because we don’t get fucking handouts, we have to work hard for everything we get, and nobody gives a fuck about us, except to, of course, shame us for existing.</p> <p>The products you buy don’t last as long as the shit your grandparents bought.  The furniture you buy has to be assembled from 400 different pieces.  I’m sure that bed will hold it’s form for more than a year, right?</p> <p>Meanwhile, the roads are shit, the utilities are expensive and require huge deposits to get started, and the schools seem more concerned with what goes in your child’s ass than what goes in your child’s head.</p> <p>But if you bring any of this up, you’re the bigot full of hate, not them.</p> <p>Can we at least get to a point where the barista isn’t trying to have a conversation about race with me and just hands me my coffee-flavored milkshake?  Can I not go and buy a cellphone without being told that gays are the master race because they have AIDS and Monkeypox?  And can we please stop calling all people on the Internet a grifter or a Fed?</p> <p>Anyway, it’s Friday night and I need a drink.  Check out my Twitch stream and give me money because I’m only valued if I’m a fucking clown you worthless degenerates.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-16548945364517653642022-08-31T18:04:00.002-04:002022-08-31T21:16:36.278-04:00The Quiet Strike<p>A little while ago, I watched Mike Rowe do an interview where he pondered with the host as to why young people are not really interested in working. And, honing the spirit of the Boomer generation before him, he got the answer so wrong.</p> <p>Now, I like Mike Rowe and I think he’s right to encourage young people, especially men, to leave the college system and get a working job that might not be glamourous, but pays well and has tangible benefits. So this isn’t a post that’s meant to bash people like him, because unlike the Boomer generation itself, he is actually trying to help young people find their way.</p> <p>But the fact that he couldn’t understand why so many young people are unwilling to work shows how out of touch people like him are. I’m sure he was opposed to student loan forgiveness for similar reasons.</p> <p>Young people are unwilling to work because they simply do not wish to participate in a society that openly despises them. It’s that simple really.</p> <p>Our society has, over the past couple of decades, taken everything from young people and pretty much set us all on a path of destruction that many of the perpetrators will never live long enough to see happen.</p> <p>I think it all came to a head when the COVID lockdowns happened. You see before most people were willing to keep their jobs probably out of a sense of routine. Once that routine was upended, they realized that they were better off not flipping burgers for random asshole Boomers showing off their vaccine cards while double-masked from six feet away.</p> <p>But it’s been building up before all that happened. The future for young people looks bleak right now. So bleak that many of them gave money to Jack Murphy to see him try and make God cry (spoiler alert: he didn’t). Or giving money to some THOT on OnlyFans because they’re screaming for some kind of validation or attention.</p> <p>Meanwhile, all the young women are in their make-work administration jobs and suddenly realize when they work from home that their job was just a social group and that they didn’t do any actual work. And they’re all alone with nothing but massive student debts and a smelly litterbox.</p> <p>And you wonder why so many young women color their hair, gain too much weight, and throw toddler temper tantrums on TikTok?</p> <p>The fact is, our society, our culture, has basically failed young people. We have denied them God, told them that happiness is the ultimate form of morality, and inverted all the things that make them happy. Meanwhile, systemic corruption is allowed to thrive to intolerable levels and the people at the top are basically robbing all of us blind.</p> <p>And asking for a second chance, forgiveness to the debt that they were all tricked into taking, they are told that they are greedy and ungrateful. It’s like the Gen-Xers and Boomers simply don’t realize that maybe, just maybe, if the Millennials didn’t have that debt, they might slowly gravitate to normalcy.</p> <p>In short, young people aren’t working because they are simply unmotivated to do so.</p> <p>And even if they do work, they’re told that they are “Quiet Quitting” because they do exactly what they are paid to do, rather than doing more, which would violate the 13th amendment.</p> <p>One day I hope that the older generation will look to foster the younger generation and not hinder them.</p> <p>Right now, they are doubling down on their foolishness.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-32849349134879652582022-08-30T17:43:00.001-04:002022-08-30T17:43:54.548-04:00Secession Will Not Save You<p>There is a prevailing sense that the United States will be plunged into another civil war or break-up within the next decade or so.  There have been many pundits out there talking about how it’s coming soon that our nation has never been more divided, etc.</p> <p>And oftentimes the people who regularly listen to these armchair prophets think that this is largely going to be a good thing.  The US Federal government is largely perceived as a corrupt institution, with greedy, lazy politicians on one end and stuffy, arrogant judges on the other.  And the people who just want to eat, drink, and find enjoyment in their work are stuck in the middle having to deal with all the consequences.</p> <p>But what these folks don’t realize is that secession and civil war will only serve to make things much, much worse for everyone.</p> <p>Right now, the state and local governments are, by and large, just as corrupt with just a little higher degree of incompetence.  There are local officials in supposedly deep red areas allowing drag queens to parade their deviancy around public spaces like parks and libraries while the police are used to protect them with potentially lethal force.  The local school boards in many of these areas seem more obsessed with ensuring “proper” sexuality is taught.</p> <p>I know the natural response is to homeschool your kids and build a parallel economy away from all of this madness.</p> <p>But do you honestly believe those corrupt overlords will let you live in peace?  You cannot fly under their radar for very long, especially as more and more people homeschool, homestead, withdraw from the popular economy, etc.</p> <p>And don’t try to think that if you have guns in your home, they’ll leave you alone.  Authoritarians don’t flinch in the face of danger either, especially when they have psychopaths working as their enforcers.  Psychopaths have no problem killing your children, raping your wives, and dragging your defiant to a secret camp.</p> <p>We have a golden opportunity right now.  We have the gift of foresight, based on mountains of information freely accessible on the Internet as well as people who are perfectly willing to correlate its contents, to a maddening degree.</p> <p>As such, we all know where our current path is going, but we also can work to avoid it.  We don’t necessarily need a prophet to walk around naked in the town square.  We just need to side with God and obey Him.</p> <p>That’s the first step anyway.</p> <p>Next, we can look at our local communities and connect with like-minded people.  A good start is your local Republican party, although you may be able to connect with groups that are not officially affiliated with any party.  Bring your skills to the table and volunteer to work for groups fighting for better education, voter integrity, lower taxes, and any other issue that affects your local community.</p> <p>My point here is that secession won’t be worth a damn if your local leadership is just a bunch of corrupt gay meth heads.</p> <p>Look, you’re probably not going to be able to change much at the Federal level.  At least not right now.  But you can address local issues and even make sure that your local leaders are honorable men who fear God.  And in the American political system, politics is a bottom-up game.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-14462113908656297212022-08-29T21:32:00.001-04:002022-08-29T21:32:38.834-04:00The Canadian Fed Who Cried Fed<p>Last week, Gavin McInnes was beginning a Livestream on his website where law enforcement interrupted and took him away.  What followed was two hours of an empty chair on his show.</p> <p>This last detail should have been a huge red flag.  If Gavin had really been taken by law enforcement, his feed would have shut off pretty much immediately and his producer would have sent a message out on social media explaining what happened.</p> <p>Enter Owen Benjamin, an acquaintance of Gavin, who was in direct contact with him.  Following this incident, he shared the following screenshot of a text message conversation between Owen and Gavin:</p> <a href="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1y5KJkmSitDZyYe_y4owWOwFrIyHwIIyY"><img title="image-40-768x959" style="display: inline; background-image: none;" border="0" alt="image-40-768x959" src="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1KxRC31C2NUSKWo2MG8JRLkPRntUN9O7C" width="196" height="244" /></a> <p> </p> <p>So it looks like the whole thing was a “prank” and Gavin McInnes just pull a huge fuck-you to the right wing.  Basically, this stunt comes with a few weeks after President Trump’s residence was unlawfully raided by the corrupt FBI under dubious circumstances and approved by an Epstein-linked Federal judge.  Tensions are already high within the ever-growing American nationalism movement that Donald Trump is the unofficial leader of and Gavin pulls a prank that could have potentially set off a powder keg.</p> <p>Then again, Gavin McInnes may very well be an FBI asset himself.  I recall that years ago he started the Proud Boys as a kind of counter movement to the radical left-wing movements like Antifa or BLM.  Okay, the details may be fuzzy on that one, but he was the leader of that group for a very long time.</p> <p>Suddenly, Gavin disavows the group and ends his relationship with them.  It sounds to me like he was coopted by the Deep State and made into an asset.  I mean, his own website, Censored.TV, features a who’s who of dubious people, many of them self-proclaimed atheists who hate Christianity, all of whom the right-wing probably is better off not associating with.</p> <p>My guess is that Gavin pulled this stunt to try and goad people into attacking the FBI McVeigh style.  Or it was the start of a false flag attack against the FBI in order to make the Right look bad.</p> <p>And really, until Gavin proves otherwise, he’s a piece of shit Deep State agent as far as I’m concerned.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-65518079878084273862022-08-25T19:12:00.001-04:002022-08-25T19:12:40.261-04:00I AM OUTRAGED<p>Frens, I am outraged, outraged, that President Joe Biden decided to forgive student loan debt!  How rude of him to give all those young people a second chance at life after they were conned into a massive student loan when they weren’t old enough to legally drink alcohol!</p> <p>As a Christian, I believe in forgiveness but I cannot forgive Biden for his forgiveness of my fellow, younger Americans who are the future of America.  I would rather he send that money overseas to Ukraine so they can continue to seize expensive yachts, sell them, and then give the proceeds to J.P. Morgan.</p> <p>I mean, doesn’t Biden understand that by canceling debts, he’s inflating the currency by eliminating it?!</p> <p>I may not be an economist, but I once watched a guy who claimed to have an economics degree on YouTube for 30 seconds while I waited for my chicken tendies to heat up and I think I know more than the idiot who is currently in the White House!</p> <p>Yes, sure, President Trump (may death come to his enemies) did forgive the student loans of veterans, but that’s different.  That doesn’t cause inflation because veterans are magic, unlike the vast majority of the current idiots who all seem to have gotten a Gender Studies degree.  I have personally interviewed all of them and none of the people receiving debt relief had any useful degree.  Not one.</p> <p>And yes, I am aware the Federal government gives out student loans and I could have ran a campaign asking Congress to require all those loan go to useful degrees in STEM only.  But I would have rather just sit in my basement eating chicken tendies and making fun of all those freaks getting gender studies degrees who then go to work for Hollywood and ruin all the shit I liked to watch.</p> <p>Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to refinance my mortgage to get a lower monthly rate but extend the repayment out to another 30 years.  I’m sure I’ll live that long and have it all paid off in time to pass on my shitty shack to my children who will be grateful for the scraps I give them.</p> <p>Because I ain’t forgiving them for all that money they owe me from all the food they ate when they lived in my house.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-53805201133024473832022-08-22T20:40:00.001-04:002022-08-22T20:40:46.838-04:00A Hypothetical Convention of States<p>I read an article where 19 states expressed interest in holding a convention of states, which is something in the Constitution where all the states send representatives to a massive convention and change the US Constitution, usually by adding amendments to it and bypassing Congress to do so.</p> <p>I know that such a thing will probably never happen since many state officials are perfectly happy with the status quo and are looking to gain Federal office so they won’t rock that boat.  Unless it’s Epstein’s boat.</p> <p>But, in the interest of dreaming, I have the following suggestions for amendments to the Constitution that may give us all some semblance of sanity back to the Federal government.  In general, I don’t believe we really need to expand the existing rights as outlined in the Constitution, just reinforce them with some more clearly outlined repercussions for violating those rights.</p> <ul> <li>The Balanced Budget Amendment.  It’s an old relic from the 1990s, but it’s something that needs to be passed.  Add a provision that requires Congress to pass a budget each year and if they do not, then the Federal government is not funded and every contractor and federal employee is out of a job.  That includes all “necessary” functions like Congressional staffers and the military.</li> <li>Create term limits for Congress.  Limit it to 12 years total for both the House and the Senate.  Therefore, a single person cannot serve in Congress for more than 12 years.</li> <li>Repeal the 17th Amendment and place the elections of Senators back into the hands of the State Legislatures.</li> <li>Change representation in the House to represent only eligible voters.  And require that there be one representative per 30,000 eligible voters.  That proportion may be a bit high, so I’d be fine with it going to in 10,000, so let’s make 30,000 the max.</li> <li>Require that all laws passed by Congress have at least a 3/5 majority in both houses and eliminate the Presidential veto.  Checks and balances was a stupid concept.</li> <li>Require that all laws passed by Congress expire in two years.  Congress can vote to renew said laws, but this makes it so that should a new party take control, it is much easier to eliminate bad laws passed by previous conventions.</li> <li>Require that all treaties ratified by the Senate expire in 6 years and must be reconsidered.  Treaties in general have been a huge loophole around the Constitution and very little has been done to stop this.  Also, this eliminates the possibility of getting caught up in entangling alliances.</li> <li>Limit Presidential authority to only what is explicitly granted to him by Congress and the Constitution.  Explicitly state that States can ignore presidential orders if they violate this standard without consequence.</li> <li>Give term limits to Federal Judges.  They can only serve a maximum of 15 years on any Federal bench.</li> <li>Limit the scope of judicial authority to only settling disputes between states and between states and the Federal government.</li> <li>Strengthen the 10th Amendment by explicitly stating that the State government can arrest, detain, and imprison any Federal official acting outside the explicit powers granted to the Federal government by the US Constitution.</li> <li>Give the States the ability to impeach and remove any elected Federal official by having a plurality of Governors call for impeachment hearings outside of Congress.  There needs to be additional methods for removing bad politicians.</li> <li>Require that the States purge their voter rolls each year and have their citizens re-register.  Right now, the Federal government prevents this because of racism.</li> <li>Limit voters to any natural-born US citizen over the age of 18.  Legalized citizens cannot vote, but any children they have who are natural-born citizens can vote.</li> <li>Require that all lending done to US citizens be completely forgiven once the debtor dies.  The lender cannot collect what is owed from the left over assets of the debtor.  Those assets belong to their children, not the lender.</li> <li>Limit all loans to US citizens to last no more than 10 years.  Once 10 years are up, the debt is forgiven and the debtor can no longer collect the debt or any interest.  Congress cannot tax the debt difference as income either.</li> <li>Interest rates for all loans are determined solely by a plurality in the House of Representatives.  They are not established by the free market lest the free market fall into a greed spiral that we see today.</li> <li>Copyrights should be owned by individual citizens, not institutions or corporations.  Once said citizen dies, the copyright falls into public domain.  Patents should be held in the same regard.  Trademarks can be owned by companies and corporations.</li> <li>Repeal the 16th Amendment and require that the Federal government acquires tax revenue from either sales tax or International tariffs.</li> </ul> <p>That’s about all the autism I can muster for this article.  I very much doubt any of these ideas will enter the public consciousness, let alone be seriously considered for the US Constitution.  I am not, after all, a prominent scholar or expert in these matters.</p> <p>But maybe some random person will see it and when this country falls apart because our Satanic overlords decide to go to war with the entire world, they can rebuild what’s left with these ideas in mind.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-69264773162940952552022-08-16T19:55:00.001-04:002022-08-16T19:55:03.973-04:00The Next EraPost-modern society is coming to a close.<div><br></div><div>This was the inevitable outcome of such a waste of a philosophy. Its fruits were always going to be poisonous and the trees that grew from them were always going to produce fire and death rather than life. I'm surprised that it has lasted as long as it has, but I guess the foundations of our modern wealth and prosperity were built with diamonds.</div><div><br></div><div>Make no mistake, our societal decay is not the result of our incredible wealth and comfort. There have been less wealthy societies that have been just as decadent, if not more so. I doubt that Sodom had indoor plumbing or doctors who specialized in prolapsed anuses, for instance.</div><div><br></div><div>A nation's wealth is not directly proportional to its obediance to God. From what I understand, many European nations were so wealthy from the 1200s to around the 1500s that people only had to work for about 14 weeks a year and they built Cathedrals in their spare time.</div><div><br></div><div>We built cities of concrete, roads of tar and stone, and houses strong enough to withstand earthquakes and hurricanes. But this is not what caused us to lose our way.</div><div><br></div><div>We've got churches. Some towns have more churches than people Churches that actively engage in the local community. Churches that preach the Word of God in nice, neat, 20 minute speeches.</div><div><br></div><div>And yet, we are a spiritually dead people. We make up sins like racism and sexism in order to protect ourselves from repenting of our true sins like lust and gluttony. In doing so, we fall into pride because we consider ourselves better than Jesus, Peter, and Paul, all of whom would be considered homophobic, racist, and sexist by today's standards.</div><div><br></div><div>This is all because of the post-modern ideals where there is no objective truth. Because we went from Jesus being the Way, the Truth, and the Life to Science being the only objective truth in this material world only to find that Science cannot explain everything. So we fell into nihilism and despair instead of turning back to God.</div><div><br></div><div>Because how could God exist in this world without explanation.</div><div><br></div><div>We have forgetten that wisdom is not faith, that intelligence is not morality, and that the material is not all there is. We grasp and we plead for a sign, for a blessing but we are unwilling to wrestle the angel for one.</div><div><br></div><div>God knows our hearts. He knows our sins, numerous as they are, even the stuff that our closest loved ones will never know. And He knows how sincere we are when we repent of our sins and ask Him to cleanse our black hearts.</div><div><br></div><div>There is a turning though. The last few years, I've noticed a subtle shift. The Elite are rapidly trying to cling to the power and influence they've had for decades in this country. Their recent actions merely reinforce the fact that they are losing control of everything.</div><div><br></div><div>But they can still win these coming battles. They won in 2020, after all. So we have to fight. We have to fight to ensure that our communities stand as beacons of Christ. This can take several forms, but most don't involve sitting on your ass and bitching on social media about how bad things are to some bot or NPC.</div><div><br></div><div>The world is changing and it can change in a good way. The Great Reset has happened. The New World Order was implemented. It can be our turn to effect change and it all starts with prayer, family, and empowering your local community. The rest will follow, trust me.</div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-32329968820412450792022-08-09T19:52:00.001-04:002022-08-09T19:52:44.986-04:00Headline NewsDid anything happen within the last week or so? I've been busy celebrating the holy Root Beer Float Day.<div><br></div><div>Apparently World War III almost really broke with China when House Speaker and failed cat-lady Nancy Pelosi went to Taiwan. The people of West Taiwan didn't like that an threatened to shot down the military escort planes.</div><div><br></div><div>Unfortunately, they were bluffing and have instead resorted to throwing a temper-tantrum by running indefinite exercies near the helpless isle. Unlike Ukraine, Taiwan isn't the one lobbing bombs at West Taiwanese neighbors for the last eight years.</div><div><br></div><div>The truth about that situation is that China only wants Taiwan because they make better stuff than China. It's industrial envy, which is how China operates. They have yet to create anything original, just make inferior replications of Western stuff. Hell, even their ideology is an inferior version of communism.</div><div><br></div><div>Apparently, the Democrats just passed the Green New Deal, in the guise of reducing inflation. I will admit, Congress did draft of a bill that raises taxes, which is probably the only thing Congress can do to reduce inflation at this point, assuming they reduce the borrowing rate. But I doubt they can manage even that.</div><div><br></div><div>The bill was passed with a 50-50 split in the Senate along party lines with some laughing half-breed hyena create casting the deciding vote. I feel like if there is a draw in the Senate, then the bill should just fail and that there should be no tie-breaker, but that's another discussion altogether.</div><div><br></div><div>Finally, just yesterday President Trump's home was raided by the FBI. Well, his main one anyway. It was clearly revenge from the judge who signed the warrant for Trump having his good friend Jeffrey Epstein arrested. I guess President Trump stepped on a lot of toes when he did that.</div><div><br></div><div>Immediately, many black-pillers took to the Internet to talk about how President Trump deserved this because of all his failures. Like flipping the oil switch and bringing down fuel prices. Or arresting Jeffrey Epstein. Or killing thousands of government regulations. Or setting the stage for the Supreme Court to overturn <i>Roe</i>.</div><div><br></div><div>I'll admit he wasn't perfect, but then again, no one is and no leader will be until Jesus comes back with His iron scepter.</div><div><br></div><div>Anyway, I'm sure this won't backfire in at all on the Globalist, Satanic, child-raping assholes who presume to rule the world because they think they are enlightened when many of them couldn't function on the mean city streets of uptown Burlington Vermont.</div><div><br></div><div>Diplomacy and civility are vastly becoming an endangered concept. It's a shame, but I guess you can't create a new world order without murdering the old one.</div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-43180719710025546432022-08-04T20:37:00.001-04:002022-08-04T20:37:18.727-04:00The Path of Gideon or JerubbaalHomeschooling right now is the best option for your children. I have no doubt about that. And every parent should do their best to provide their children with a solid, classical education.<div><br></div><div>Homesteading may be a solid alternative to the current corruption of food. Growing your own food and raising your own livestock is a solid idea and even if you can't raise chickens or goats or pigs, you can at least grow potatos in a bucket.<br><div><br></div><div>But that doesn't mean you are exempt from the fight against local evil.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Consider the prophet Gideon. When we first meet him, his land is constantly ravaged by foreigners while his people starve. This is so bad that Gideon is beating his wheat out inside a wine press in order to hide it.</div><div><br></div><div>In other words, he is working outside the system in order to survive. The Midianites were nearby looking to steal his food and the best he could do was make his flour in secret.</div><div><br></div><div>Then God speaks to him and empowers him. Gideon then, on God's instruction, tears down the local altar to Baal and the Ashera pole next to it. After that, he is called Jerubbaal because he was bold enough to cleanse the evil that had overtaken his community.</div><div><br></div><div>And because he cleansed the local evil in his community, he was able to then liberate his nation from the Midianites.</div><div><br></div><div>Our country has been overtaken by a great evil. They have near full control of entertainment, government, and the press. And yet, we cannot just withdraw from society and leave others to succumb to wickedness.</div><div><br></div><div>But we start to fight back in our local communities. Some communities are better than others. Some have solid local school boards who are trying to educate children. Some are doing worse things in the name of Satan.</div><div><br></div><div>And just because you homeschool, it doesn't mean you shouldn't fight. Because CRT, sexual education, and so much other nonsense is our altar to Baal. How can we hope to fight against the greater evils in our nation if we are not fighting the lesser ones next to our homes?</div><div><br></div><div>So your path is clear: you can follow Gideon's path and make your food in secret hoping they don't find you or you can follow the path of Jerubbaal, where you find your courage and fight back against the evil around you.</div><div><br></div><div>And if you are homeschooling and homesteading, you have a much more solid foundation than most other people.</div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-65752868319813673122022-07-28T21:40:00.001-04:002022-07-28T21:40:03.264-04:00The True Nature of Spiritual WarfareThere has been speculation in the darker corners of the Internet that many serial killers are not working alone. Some even go so far as to speculate that law enforcement on nearly every level is, at the very least, complicit in these crimes if not downright involved in them.<div><br></div><div>In more recent years, I think this is becoming a more widely accepted theory, especially in light of the Pizzagate revelations. I believe that people are beginning to accept a hard truth and that is that there has been a vast network of Satanic practioners who have operated campaigns of terror against this country in an effort to corrupt our society and gain power.</div><div><br></div><div>I am almost certain that there are secret Satanic cults all over this country, many of them hiding in plain sight, and that many of them are starting to make themselves know. The desire to push for the normalization of pedophilia is an indication to me that these groups would like to operate more in the open than they do..</div><div><br></div><div>During an interview with Art Bell, Father Malachi Martin stated, very casually, that there were prominant families who came here during colonial times specifically because they want to practice their brand of Satanism outside of the arm of the Western Churches. While he didn't specify who, as I suspect he didn't know or just didn't want to incur a lawsuit, since he was a lifelong exorcist, I have to take his statement as truth. Demons like to talk during exorcisms and it wouldn't surprise me if one tried to exchange information for a reprieve of Jesus's wrath.</div><div><br></div><div>I think things started to look wrong shortly after the Manson murders. But I don't think Charles Manson was the one behind those brutal and savage killings. More than likely, Manson himself was a patsy since he was in prison for roughly half his life yet somehow managed to start a hippie cult fresh out of prison that was able to rent property from a Beach Boy and live amongst many Hollywood stars. Nobody is that charming.</div><div><br></div><div>But Manson's murder of Sharon Tate is what really intrigues me. Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate both held many occult-like parties during the 1960s where supposedly Sirhan Sirhan attended. You know, the guy who went to prison for murdering Robert Kennedy. They guy who had an eight barrel revolver and managed to fire 13 rounds without reloading, according to the audio tapes.</div><div><br></div><div>But the links get creepier. Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski had dinner with Robert Kennedy the night before he was murdered. And then five months later, Sharon Tate is brutally murdered in what appears to motivated by a deranged hippie cult leader listening to too much pop music.</div><div><br></div><div>Remember, one time is a coincidence, more than that and you have a lot of smoke. And there were just too many coincidences here.</div><div><br></div><div>Flash forward a bit to the Son of Sam killings. Now, I had know for a long time that David Berkowitz had claimed that he never acted alone. That he was part of a Satanic cult that had summoned a demon they nicknamed "Sam" and that the demon had demanded blood sacrifices from the cult. Berkowitz himself has claimed that he only murdered two people and that the rest he was just an accessory to. Yet he hasn't used these claims to fight for probation. In fact, the first few times he was up for probation, he declined to be considered for parole because he believed he belonged in prison for the rest of his life. This indicates to me that he is telling the truth because why would a serial killer claim some degree of innocence while insisting he remain locked up?</div><div><br></div><div>Berkowitz also claimed that the cult he was a part of had brought in an outsider to perform at least one of the killings and that this one was actually more of a professional hit. This man was nicknamed "Manson 2" and has been identified as one William Malony Mentzer.</div><div><br></div><div>Mentzer, by the way, may have been the Zodiac Killer, or one of them anyway. The Zodiac killings also have the mark of a Satanic terror campaign similar to the Son of Sam killings, so this should come as no surprise. Mentzer also worked as a bodyguard for Larry Flint, the infamous pornographer.</div><div><br></div><div>One last thread and this one should also frighten you. David Parker Ray was known as the Toy-Box Killer. He was a man living in New Mexico who kidnapped, raped, and tortured women in his custom trailer that was on his property. He was so prolific that he had a recorded an introduction of sorts for his newest victims. In this recording, he detailed many things, including how he has killed women in the past but preferred not to and about how he would have friends over to watch these women get raped by his dogs.</div><div><br></div><div>The thing is, David Parker Ray did have accomplices who were caught, but I don't think everyone was caught. His daughter did report him to the FBI back in the 1980s, but nothing came of it. He wasn't caught until 1999. He died of a heart attack while being transported to be interrogated by state police. Given that the CIA has had a heart attack gun since before 1975, it would not surprise me to learn that David Parker Ray was silenced. Not necessarily by the CIA specifically, but definitely by rogue elements in the US government.</div><div><br></div><div>It is important to note that David Parker Ray was alleged to have sold some of his victims to other criminal organizations. More than likely, these were Satanic-type cults operating out of Mexico, where it was easier to bribe police.</div><div><br></div><div>I could go on. I could talk about the claims of Henry Lee Lucas and Ottis Toole. About how John Wayne Gacy was probably not operating alone and that his house was most likely the dumping ground. One of his teenage employees ended up being a mass murderer himself.</div><div><br></div><div>As a Christian, I was told that we are engaged in a spiritual war with demonic forces. But the implication is that it is solely a spiritual war. But like Jesus, Satan has his earthly agents as well. And their capacity for evil should not be underestimated.</div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-84891427256999214672022-07-27T19:55:00.000-04:002022-07-27T19:55:57.721-04:00China Receives the Mark of Freedom<p>In a shocking turn of events, the Council for Freedom and Enlightenment stated that the People's Republic of China was set to be the next great Empire of the World and receive the Mark of Freedom. When pressed as to what caused them to come to this vital decision, their chief representative Moloch stated that it was simply a case of numbers.</p><p>"China, you see," he stated, "was able to sacrifice more babies than the United States. By our estimation, they sacrificed 136 million babies, mostly virgin girls, in our name. In the same timeframe, the United States only managed to sacrifice 63 million."</p><p>"And so, it is with great glee that we bestow our blessings, influence, and, above, material prosperity on the nation of China," he added.</p><p>When asked what was to happen to the current empire of the Western democracies, he simply stated that they would replace all their competent leaders with fools and idiots, their wealth would be confiscated, their food would be shipped out, and their civilization would face a massive collapse.</p><p>"It's unfortunate, but this is how we have done these things for centuries," Moloch reiterated adding, "I mean, it is a real shame, we had high hopes for the United States, but they never really successfully got rid of our enemy from the hearts of the people."</p><p>When pressed as to the various Enemy converts within China, he brushed off the concerns.</p><p>"Those groups are marginalized and largely of little influence in Chinese culture overall. Besides, the Chinese don't make a big deal out of ostracizing their own or even shipping them off the prison camps," he stated.</p><p>When US representatives were asked for comment, they just laughed uncontrollably and soiled themselves in what appeared to be the Curse of the Forsaken setting in.</p>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-20845744536452984682022-07-26T21:22:00.001-04:002022-07-26T21:22:31.629-04:00Musing on Body and SpiritAre our souls, or spirits, and bodies separate entities? What is the link between the body and the spirit? Is there a link between mental illness and a damaged or afflicted spirit? Does the physical merely reflect the spirit or is it a vessel?<div><br></div><div>I don't know the answer these questions myself. You might.</div><div><br></div><div>What I do know is that in the Bible, Elisha, who had a double portion of Elijah's spirit, died. And when some morons dumped a dead man on top of his bones, that man came back from the dead. Was there a spirit still in those bones or did God consecrate the ground where Elisha was buried?</div><div><br></div><div>Or when Moses struck the rock with his staff instead of shouting at it to bring forth water. It worked, despite his disobedience, so it was as if he had some autonomy to use his spiritual portion as he saw fit.</div><div><br></div><div>Our bodies aren't exactly supposed to be regarded with contempt either. Paul writes that our bodies are temples to God. And yet so many fools have Type-II Diabetes. Not to mention Monkeypox. And if you can't overcome gluttony or lust, how can you expect to escape Purgatory?</div><div><br></div><div>On top of that, Jesus Himself gave up his spirit but come back in full body from the dead. His Spirit was strong enough to support a body dead for three days and still full of holes. That last part might have been told in jest on his part for Thomas.</div><div><br></div><div>So what is the link between body and spirit? I really don't know and the Bible only gives us clues. I can't trust modern interpretations because theologians are largely full of themselves. Ancient Bible scholars don't seem to have the answers either.</div><div><br></div><div>Maybe it's just mystery to never be solved with wisdom. Or, more likely, I simply lack wisdom to properly understand it all.</div><div><br></div><div>Either way, there is more to the link between spirit and body than I think modern and post-modern thought understands it.</div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4926443430686583766.post-65916325624389513422022-07-25T17:59:00.001-04:002022-07-25T17:59:44.284-04:00Become the SystemThere is a Uniparty that has control over mainstream politics right now. And it is pretty much the Democrats who run it.<div><br></div><div>I've heard for pretty much my entire adult life that Republicans are no different than Democrats, just a different party. To a degree, that is true because most politicians want the same things: power and prestige.</div><div><br></div><div>The thing is, though, both sides are not the same. Yes, we constantly see a lot of top-level Republicans cucking to the Democrats, even when Republicans have full control of all three branches of government.</div><div><br></div><div>But does that earn them any money from the Western Oligarchs?</div><div><br></div><div>If you look at the politicians who are primarily funded by the likes of George Soros and Warren Buffet, it is pretty much only going one way. It was money from Mark Zuckerberg that was illegally used to defraud the election in favor of Democrats, not Republicans.</div><div><br></div><div>The entire voting system has been corrupted by those assholes in order to ensure that Democrats get elected.</div><div><br></div><div>But not Republicans. Republicans, by and large, don't get any voter fraud going their way, at least not at a systemic level. They also don't any money from these people either. Earlier this month, it was reported that George Soros gave a ton of money to Stacey Abrams in her bid to run for Georgia governor, a woman who couldn't manage a fucking abortion clinic. I'm not a huge fan of Jack Kemp, but that guy at least validated the election for Joe Biden. And that is the thanks he gets from them.</div><div><br></div><div>The fact is, there is no bifactional ruling party. There are globalists and nationalists. And the nationalist movement is growing in the United States, despite the best efforts of the pedophiles to suppress it, going so far as to threaten raping our children in public schools.</div><div><br></div><div>Yes, there are Republicans who tow the globalist narrative and many of them have a ton of unearned influence in the Republican party. But they don't get the money, the power, or the prestige that their Democrat counterparts enjoy.</div><div><br></div><div>On top of that, there is a huge nationalist movement at the grassroots level of the Republican party right now. We caught a glimpse of that last year in Virginia where hundreds of people volunteered to poll watch and help ensure a fairer election process. This combined with the Democrats being revealed as pro-child rape, provided the offender identifies as a tranny, ensured that a Republican won in a state where the Deep State runs deep.</div><div><br></div><div>The system has been corrupted. But there is a weakness in that corruption in that the people running it are corrupt, not the system itself. So become the system. Sign up to run local elections as an election officer. Volunteer to poll watch. Don't just bitch and complain about how the whole process is broken. Be the process. </div>swiftfoxmark2http://www.blogger.com/profile/05065756739868968717noreply@blogger.com0